Bushroda
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,880
- Reaction score
- 0
Transforming India
24 Jul 2007, 0008 hrs IST
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) now describes India as a transforming rather than a developing country. This change in nomenclature may have been motivated by the need to cut an already minuscule amount of aid that India receives from the US. But it indicates a new way of looking at countries like India and China and the unique position they occupy in the world.
American aid has always been strategically leveraged, with the bulk of it directed to a chosen few like Israel, Egypt, Pakistan and increasingly Iraq. It's not worth ruing the fact that USAID flows to India next year will be $81 million, down 35 per cent from this year's.
Even at the higher rate it amounts to only 11 cents, or less than five rupees, for every Indian. In any case, India is looking for trade access rather than aid from the US as a way of lifting its economy and improving the living standards of its people. To label India as developing is to place it in the same bracket as the underdeveloped, the latter term having fallen into disuse lately. But both generate their own sets of cliches and vested interests.
To be developing is to make ritual invocations to the wretched of the earth, wallow in poverty while blaming others for one's plight, know where to plead while making occasional prickly assertions of independence, and generally set low expectations for oneself. It's an identity that India needs to grow out of. Transforming would be a better description for the country to internalise.
Influential recent studies, such as the ones carried out by Goldman Sachs and McKinsey Global Institute, suggest that the India story in the 21st century doesn't have to be a repeat of the latter half of the 20th. Both studies see it as a giant in the making, a crucial pole of the future world economic order.
India has enormous problems and enormous prospects. It may have the makings of a superpower, but its infant mortality rate is a shocking 57 per 1,000 births; higher than Bangladesh or Namibia and about double that of Egypt. It's been left far behind by China in power, ports, roads, health and education. In the circumstances, transforming is an appropriate category. We have a lot of way to make up for the lost years of chronic, self-pitying underdevelopment. And we are not there yet.
24 Jul 2007, 0008 hrs IST
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) now describes India as a transforming rather than a developing country. This change in nomenclature may have been motivated by the need to cut an already minuscule amount of aid that India receives from the US. But it indicates a new way of looking at countries like India and China and the unique position they occupy in the world.
American aid has always been strategically leveraged, with the bulk of it directed to a chosen few like Israel, Egypt, Pakistan and increasingly Iraq. It's not worth ruing the fact that USAID flows to India next year will be $81 million, down 35 per cent from this year's.
Even at the higher rate it amounts to only 11 cents, or less than five rupees, for every Indian. In any case, India is looking for trade access rather than aid from the US as a way of lifting its economy and improving the living standards of its people. To label India as developing is to place it in the same bracket as the underdeveloped, the latter term having fallen into disuse lately. But both generate their own sets of cliches and vested interests.
To be developing is to make ritual invocations to the wretched of the earth, wallow in poverty while blaming others for one's plight, know where to plead while making occasional prickly assertions of independence, and generally set low expectations for oneself. It's an identity that India needs to grow out of. Transforming would be a better description for the country to internalise.
Influential recent studies, such as the ones carried out by Goldman Sachs and McKinsey Global Institute, suggest that the India story in the 21st century doesn't have to be a repeat of the latter half of the 20th. Both studies see it as a giant in the making, a crucial pole of the future world economic order.
India has enormous problems and enormous prospects. It may have the makings of a superpower, but its infant mortality rate is a shocking 57 per 1,000 births; higher than Bangladesh or Namibia and about double that of Egypt. It's been left far behind by China in power, ports, roads, health and education. In the circumstances, transforming is an appropriate category. We have a lot of way to make up for the lost years of chronic, self-pitying underdevelopment. And we are not there yet.