Indian double standard on Kashmir issue. From Kashmir to Junagarh

[khakhi_chaddi]

Sure.. But do you see my making moronic claims like yourself?

Do you see your stupid logic at work now?

My logic is right.

China was also not ruled by a single ruler for most part of history. Yet it is a nation defined by a majority culture.

No point in have an argument with you people as you will never accept logic. Just will give frivolous argument to defend the indefensible.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

I am very much an Indian.

I claim this whole land, including what is now Pakistan and Bangladesh, to be my land. Rest is not for general consumption brother.

Not that I'm concerned.. But you can't even claim equal rights let alone my homeland.

My logic is right.

China was also not ruled by a single ruler for most part of history. Yet it is a nation defined by a majority culture.

That's a really stupid statement.. China has existed as a national state for thousands of years... They always had a Ruler who ruled from Peking... That's why there exists a royal palace..


Perks of being a homogenous state..

No point in have an argument with you people as you will never accept logic. Just will give frivolous argument to defend the indefensible.

You don't even have an arguement..

 

[weqi]

You concept of a nation is not true. Just because nations in europe became republics on some date does not mean they were not a nation before.

India was a country since 5000 years with Hinduism as defining factor. It became a republic in 1947 that too under forced boundaries defined by Britishers and not people of the nation.

@DESERT FIGHTER @khakhi_chaddi

The name India is derived from Indus, which originates from the Old Persian word Sindhi.[24] The latter term stems from the Sanskrit word Sindhu, which was the historical local appellation for the Indus River.[25] The ancient Greeks referred to the Indians as Indoi (Ινδοί), which translates as "The people of the Indus".[26]

The geographical term Bharat (Bhārat, pronounced [ˈbʱaːrət̪] ( listen)), which is recognised by the Constitution of India as an official name for the country,[27] is used bymany Indian languages in its variations. It is a modernisation of the historical name Bharatavarsha, which gained increasing currency from the mid-19th century onwards as a native name of India.[21] Scholars believe it to be named after the Vedic tribe of Bharatas in the second millennium B.C.E.[28] It is also traditionally associated with the rule of the legendary emperor Bharata.[29] Gaṇarājya (literally, people's State) is the Sanskrit/Hindi term for "republic" dating back to the ancient times.[30][31][32]

Hindustan ([ɦɪnd̪ʊˈst̪aːn] ( listen)) is an ancient Persian name for India dating to 3 century B.C.E. It was introduced into India by the Mughals and widely used since then, often being thought of as the "Land of the Hindus." Its meaning varied, referring to a region that encompassed northern India and Pakistan or India in its entirety.[21][33][34]

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

@DESERT FIGHTER @khakhi_chaddi

The name India is derived from Indus, which originates from the Old Persian word Sindhi.[24] The latter term stems from the Sanskrit word Sindhu, which was the historical local appellation for the Indus River.[25] The ancient Greeks referred to the Indians as Indoi (Ινδοί), which translates as "The people of the Indus".[26]

The geographical term Bharat (Bhārat, pronounced [ˈbʱaːrət̪] ( listen)), which is recognised by the Constitution of India as an official name for the country,[27] is used bymany Indian languages in its variations. It is a modernisation of the historical name Bharatavarsha, which gained increasing currency from the mid-19th century onwards as a native name of India.[21] Scholars believe it to be named after the Vedic tribe of Bharatas in the second millennium B.C.E.[28] It is also traditionally associated with the rule of the legendary emperor Bharata.[29] Gaṇarājya (literally, people's State) is the Sanskrit/Hindi term for "republic" dating back to the ancient times.[30][31][32]

And Sindh before anexation itself consisted of several states.. Mostly ruled by Talpur Baluch Dynasty..

 

[khakhi_chaddi]

Not that I'm concerned.. But you can't even claim equal rights let alone my homeland.



That's a really stupid statement.. China has existed as a national state for thousands of years... They always had a Ruler who ruled from Peking... That's why there exists a royal palace..


Perks of being a homogenous state..



You don't even have an arguement..

What you have said about China is factually incorrect. Thats what I mean by defending the indefensible.

Do some research and give me names of rulers who ruled whole of China for past 2000 years.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

What you have said about China is factually incorrect. Thats what I mean by defending the indefensible.

Do some research and give me names of rulers who ruled whole of China for past 2000 years.

http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/main_pop/kpct/kp_qinhan.htm

http://www.chinahighlights.com/travelguide/culture/china-history.htm


@Chinese-Dragon. @long_

 

[khakhi_chaddi]

http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/main_pop/kpct/kp_qinhan.htm

http://www.chinahighlights.com/travelguide/culture/china-history.htm


@Chinese-Dragon

Dont give me links.

Make an excel sheet.

Name of ruler; Area ruled; Period of rule.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Dont give me links.

Make an excel sheet.

Name of ruler; Area ruled; Period of rule.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qin_dynasty

http://www.chinahighlights.com/travelguide/culture/china-history.htm


https://ilookchina.net/2011/06/14/qin-shi-huangdi-the-man-that-unified-china-viewed-as-single-page/

http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/main_pop/kpct/kp_qinhan.htm


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qin_Shi_Huang

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_of_China



I'm not your babysitter..

 

[khakhi_chaddi]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qin_dynasty

http://www.chinahighlights.com/travelguide/culture/china-history.htm


https://ilookchina.net/2011/06/14/qin-shi-huangdi-the-man-that-unified-china-viewed-as-single-page/

http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/main_pop/kpct/kp_qinhan.htm


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qin_Shi_Huang

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_of_China



I'm not your babysitter..

You are avoiding the issue by giving some random links. As I said. Your argument is logically flawed and my argument is correct. You are defending the indefensible.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

You are avoiding the issue by giving some random links. As I said. Your argument is logically flawed and my argument is correct. You are defending the indefensible.

What issue? Do you dispute the existence of a unified China? Or the existence of the Chinese Emporer who ruled it?

Are you that thick headed goof ball?

 

[khakhi_chaddi]

What issue? Do you dispute the existence of a unified China? Or the existence of the Chinese Emporer who ruled it?

Are you that thick headed goof ball?

I am disputing your logic.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

I am disputing your logic.

On what basis?

 

[nik141993]

Sure but are you offering to give us those states?

first give me name I know about Afghan pashtun being part of Delhi sultanate but don't know about your baluch ancestors being ruler of present day india..I might be wrong so plz enlighten me

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

You are saying that India did not exist as a nation as it was not ruled by a single ruler for whole subcontinent for majority of time.

I am saying by same logic China is also not a nation as it was not ruled by a single ruler for majority of time.

But you are not giving any proof that China was ruled by a single ruler for majority of time.

Yet you are accepting that China is a nation but India is not.

The last Chinese Emporer Puyi .. Office abolished in 1915;

 

[khakhi_chaddi]

On what basis?

You are saying that India did not exist as a nation as it was not ruled by a single ruler for whole subcontinent for majority of time.

I am saying by same logic China is also not a nation as it was not ruled by a single ruler for majority of time.

But you are not giving any proof that China was ruled by a single ruler for majority of time.

Yet you are accepting that China is a nation but India is not.