What's new

Indian Army can take out 26/11 Conspirators in Pakistan : VK Singh

Don't be a idiot. 3 million Baloch sparesly spread out and are contigous whereas Bengal was 1,300 miles away. There is therefore no comparison to Bangladesh. Also Baloch are less 2% of population of Pakistan.

Bengalis on the other hand numbered more than all of West Pakistan. Your figure of 90,000 is false. That includes Pakistan Army combat troops 50,000 and Police plus civilian government employess with families.

Even the 50,000 were composed of one division with another hastily prepared division which had left it's entire heavey equipment back in West Pakistan because of logistics issues. 50,000 men again a swampy delta region ideal for freedom fighters of Mukto Bahini operating against a Bengali population then of 555 million and Indian Army attack. Just around the corner in Vietnam a superpower with 250,000 fighting a small country was thoroughly defeated.

What if China had also joined in with Viet Cong fighters like India joined in with Mukti Bahini - US would not have lasted months.

Don't be hasty, I never made a direct comparison. I merely raised the point that arguments that it can never happen in a 'gazillion' years are childish. Your state is relatively weak, particularly in an economic sense, aside from being politically unstable and riddled with sectarian conflict. A weak state cannot control its domain for long, particularly against a well-funded opposition; if the Baloch separatists were to be properly funded rather been thrown little hand-outs now and then.

Excuses as to why 90K or 50K if one were to take your word for it, surrendered are of little interest to anyone but your countrymen. We can go into the details but why bother, the end result is known to all and as I said, I never made any direct comparison.

China joining Vietnam to kick US out would be odd and silly as then it would have to take on the might of US. India had no such problem with Pak. Not sure the Soviets would back China against US as they did with India, but I see no significance of that in the present context.

Ultimately, what happens to your country matters little in the long run from an Indian perspective. If even you are gone, we have a much bigger headache to the east. Besides for India, the idea in Baloch would be bleed your country and exhaust its already strained resources. Whether they receive their freedom or not is hardly paramount.

Isn't that your official excuse for LoC violations? Why would poor Pak start a conflict on the east when its fighting a war in the west? :lol:

Your paid mercenaries are doing their job just perfectly ..... :lol:

FC Balochistan Arrests BLF Terrorist Escaping in Woman Clothes

Nah that must be one of the poorer ones, no worries we can get much better. :enjoy:

Besides, you have a source for that, it looks like you caught that guy and dressed him up. :lol:
 
Last edited:
The point was a superpower was defeated by Viet Cong in a enivornment similar to Bengal delta and not too far way. China was given as a example. That is US got defeated just by Viet Cong let alone another giant like China joining in.

If you must masticate yourself go ahead but the Baloch problem whilst no doubt a problem is too small. I told you they make less than 2% of the population of Pakistan. To compare Baloch and Bengal is ridicalous. Let alone 2% of the population the Bengali made 110% . In other words they were more than all of West Pak put togather and were 1,200 miles away. On top of that India joined in as well. US Army of 50,000 would have lasted weeks unless reinforced something Pak could not do. We are not and were not a superpower. So stop making ridicalous comparisons.

You have problems in India that are far larger and serious then Baloch problem. Need I remind you of Naxalites? Don't forget that when you go down the road of making idiotic posts you open yourself also of recieving in kind. I gave one example of "people living in glass". Do you want more .... ? I don't think so.

Naxalite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As regards the 90,000 figure do please look at the following newspaper from 1971. That 90k includes all people from West Pakistan.

3-jpg.213587
 
You are welcome to post more, tell me more about the naxals. Then tell me when India feels the need to use them as an excuse at borders.

I could go into greater detail as to how precisely one could go about liberating Baloch but that was never the point. Besides, while Baloch may be small in population its rich in resources and it also serves the interest of western countries to have it free from troublesome Pak. Think of that and make sure you are never more trouble than you are worth to those countries that foot your bill.

They are many other dimensions to this that I have little interest or patience to go into here. You are welcome to your confidence of never losing Baloch, time will tell. Besides, the more resources you waste their the better it is for us and the world.

Make up your mind next time a LoC violation occurs, whether you are too weak to fight on both fronts due to these separatists or whether these separatists are not much of a problem. Bringing in naxalites, have you ever heard from India how we are too busy fighting naxals, so why would we start firing at LoC? :lol:

Finally, if you find 50K significantly less humiliating than 90K, be my guest.
 
between two unequal neighbors

Numbers do not make unequal neighbors, buddy :). Anyways, to give you a fresh idea of modern warfare, US and AFG are two unequal countries, USA -- probably the most developed, AFG, probably the most underdeveloped. You can see the outcome :).

Two give you another idea of modern warfare, who do you think is winning in Iran and KSA proxy war? :) KSA is more powerful than Iran. :)
 
Don't be a idiot. 3 million Baloch sparesly spread out and are contiguous whereas Bengal was 1,300 miles away. There is therefore no comparison to Bangladesh. Also Baloch are less 2% of population of Pakistan.

Bengalis on the other hand numbered more than all of West Pakistan. Your figure of 90,000 is false. That includes Pakistan Army combat troops 50,000 and Police plus civilian government employess with families.

Even the 50,000 were composed of one division with another hastily prepared division which had left it's entire heavy equipment back in West Pakistan because of logistics issues. 50,000 men in a swampy delta region ideal for freedom fighters of Mukto Bahini operating against a Bengali population then of 55 million and Indian Army attack. Just around the corner in Vietnam a superpower with 250,000 men fighting a small country was thoroughly defeated.

What if China had also joined in with Viet Cong fighters like India joined in with Mukti Bahini - US would not have lasted months.

You are talking too much sense with an idiot. Think again if that imbecile is worth all hard work.
 
This is a political statement, not a military one. Appeasing the audience..
 
This just in - India can take over the world but "certain considerations" prevent it from doing so. - VK Singh
 
This just in - India can take over the world but "certain considerations" prevent it from doing so. - VK Singh

They do not even need to use their Army, their traffic police can do that
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom