What's new

Indian Air Force (IAF) denies MiG-29 deployment in Tajikistan

Owais

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
4,512
Reaction score
0
Indian Air Force (IAF) denies MiG-29 deployment in Tajikistan

IANS
Thu, 4 May 2006, 00:16

NEW DELHI: The Indian Air Force (IAF) has denied reports that it proposes to deploy its MiG-29 multi-role fighters at an air base in Tajikistan that India is helping build and which is likely to be completed by the year-end.

Responding to a report, an IAF spokesperson claimed that the hangars being constructed by the quasi-military Border Roads Organisation (BRO) at Aini, close to the Tajik capital Dushanbe, were not being built to accommodate air force aircraft of any sort, including trainers.
Contradicting the news report, the IAF declared it was also not helping Tajikistan retrofit its Soviet era aircraft.
The IAF denial, however, is somewhat disingenuous.
It does not directly address the news report that stated that the IAF was planning on "parking" a fleet of MiG-29s for "varying periods" in two of three hangars being constructed by the BRO. These hangers are capable of accommodating between 12 to 14 aircraft.
Defence sources have also told that the IAF is considering posting an officer of the rank of group captain to Aini to supervise the air base's completion by the Tajik National Day on Sep 9.
Presently a contingent of around 40 Indian Army and Air Force personnel, including around six officers commanded by an army colonel, were overseeing the air base's refurbishment.
At no point does the news report declare that the IAF proposes to "deploy" its MiG 29 multi-role fighters at Aini, a term that has different meaning of which the air force is no doubt fully aware.
The report clearly stated that the IAF proposes to send its fighters to Aini from time to time in consonance with growing defence relations between Dushanbe and Delhi. The latter would, of course, be determined jointly by the foreign and defence ministries and the IAF.
It is possible, however, that due to operational considerations the IAF might choose not to send MiG-29's to Aini but some other aircraft.
The type of aircraft would, military sources said, depend on availability as well as the prevailing security situation in the area coupled with India's growing security and economic profile in the oil-rich Central Asian Region.
The IAF has frequently flaunted its "out of contingency area" operational capabilities which, doubtlessly, would encompass such a possibility.
Besides, its inventory that includes long range strike platforms and six Uzebek Il-78 mid-air refuellers point clearly to a "forward deployment" ability and the desire to play an "extended role" in the region.
The Il-78 makes the IAF the world's sixth air force to possess mid-air refuelling capability. Their induction has almost doubled the strike range of the Su-30 Mk I multi-role fighters from 3,200 km to nearly 7,000 km as well as the flight time of its Mirage 2000 H's and Jaguar combat aircraft.
The IAF denial that it does not propose helping the Tajik's service and repair their Soviet fighters is in direct contravention of the bilateral defence co-operation treaty the two countries signed during the previous National Democratic Alliance-led administration.
The report further stated that the defence ministry had declined to comment on its military's role in rebuilding the Tajik air base.
But military planners said it would provide India "longer strategic reach" in the Central Asian Region once IAF fighters began landing there in an endeavour to help it secure badly-needed oil contracts.
 
.
One sincerely hopes that Pakistan has taken due cognisance of India’s frantic efforts in building a military runway at an airbase at Ayni, north-west of the Tajikistan capital of Dushanbe. Strategically located near Afghanistan, Pakistan and China, the place will be India’s first military base outside the country. It will offer India a foothold in a region — the CIS —that has so far been out of her ambit.
There are two facets to this airbase. One, the air base is an integral part of India’s oil security plan as India has already tied up with the Kazakhstan government for oil exploration there. Since the region is afloat in oil and gas India has chosen to be there right now. Two, the runway will handle fighter and heavy military transport aircrafts.

India has held joint air exercises with Israel and the US A in the past and could hold these in the future too. With India having an air base in Tajikistan, the US and Israeli military aircrafts could also be stationed there, during such future joint exercises, which will bring the Israelis dangerously too close to our strategic targets.
 
.
miroslav said:
You make me fool once. Shame on you.



You make me fool second time. Shame on me. :flag:

Miro

fix your self.:cheesy:
The artical is backed by an indepandent source:sniper:
 
.
Owais said:
fix your self.:cheesy:
The artical is backed by an indepandent source:sniper:

I dont need any source to convince myself.

May it is the MiG-29 deployment which is now discussed for 5 years

If you think there is no such deployment then it is good for you.

Miro
 
.
If IAF have sent Mig-29 to Tajikistan let them. What is the use? They are going to keep their aircrafts in a smoking dust, just like how their soldiers were sitting near the border for more than 2 years, and had to go back. I laugh on Indian doctrine. :laugh:
 
.
Dude...

Armies most of the time sit around doing nothing..as u say 'in a smoking dust'.Its only when a war starts their strategic positioning comes into play.And it could well make the difference between winning and losing the war.
 
.
Lilo said:
Dude...

Armies most of the time sit around doing nothing..as u say 'in a smoking dust'.Its only when a war starts their strategic positioning comes into play.And it could well make the difference between winning and losing the war.

Take my example.

Even if I just don't sit and in middle of a lot of action there is a dust.

Afghanistan is full of dust. :wall:

Miro
 
. .
India will at the end have some Sqn of ACs stationed at Aini,no AFs pay a huge bill for nothing,plus strategically it's a new front to be opened in need.;)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom