Abingdonboy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 29,597
- Reaction score
- 46
- Country
- Location
So many armchair experts on here quick to bash the IAF (including the writer of this article) but the fact of the matter is that the empirical evidence does not support the notion that the IAF is inherently prone to more air losses than any other modern air force. This is the world's 4th largest air force let's not forget- 6 crashes in 6 months is hardly abnormal.
The last year figures were freely availble (2012-13) the IAF registered a crash rate of 0.22 per 10,000 flight hours- a figure that is more than comparable with any Western air force. When you consider the IAF is still heavily reliant on aged machines like the MiG-21/27, Cheetaks, Cheetahs and Mi-8s this is rather impressive really.
The last year figures were freely availble (2012-13) the IAF registered a crash rate of 0.22 per 10,000 flight hours- a figure that is more than comparable with any Western air force. When you consider the IAF is still heavily reliant on aged machines like the MiG-21/27, Cheetaks, Cheetahs and Mi-8s this is rather impressive really.