Indian aggression at LOC

[M. Sarmad]

What is working boundary?

The 190 km border between (Narowal and Sialkot districts of) Pakistani Punjab and (Kathua, Samba and Jammu districts of) Indian Occupied J&K.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

The 190 km border between (Narowal and Sialkot districts of) Pakistani Punjab and (Kathua, Samba and Jammu districts of) Indian Occupied J&K.

I have heard the Jammu areas usually remain calm

 

[Dash]

However, as per UN resolutions, Kashmir (Jammu Kashmir) is a disputed territory which means that globally, the countries consider Jammu Kashmir to be a disputed territory and not an internal matter of India.

The disputed tag was dropped in 2010 by UN.

Link-->https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/jammu-and-kashmir-removed-from-list-of-disputes-under-un-439267

 

[PDF]

The disputed tag was dropped in 2010 by UN.

Link-->https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/jammu-and-kashmir-removed-from-list-of-disputes-under-un-439267

Please use sources which are not of Indian media because Indian news is worst than garbage and HLW.

 

[M. Sarmad]

I have heard the Jammu areas usually remain calm

Quite the contrary, Jammu is the most affected area, esp. on the Indian side. There are over 400 villages on the Indian side in Jammu (predominantly Hindu/Sikh) that lie within 5 km of the border, and in 2014 alone, as per the Govt. of India Press Information Bureau, 73,368 people were displaced due to cross border exchange in the three districts of Jammu, Kathua and Samba.

 

[Aasimkhan]

The disputed tag was dropped in 2010 by UN.

Link-->https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/jammu-and-kashmir-removed-from-list-of-disputes-under-un-439267

NDTV is not trusted even in India

 

[Areesh]

The disputed tag was dropped in 2010 by UN.

Link-->https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/jammu-and-kashmir-removed-from-list-of-disputes-under-un-439267

Lol this again

 

[M. Sarmad]

The disputed tag was dropped in 2010 by UN.

Link-->https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/jammu-and-kashmir-removed-from-list-of-disputes-under-un-439267

It was an inadvertent omission (of Jammu and Kashmir dispute) in a statement by the President of Security Council, while it was duly mentioned in the Annual Report of the Security Council and was also present on its agenda. The Indian Media claimed that "Jammu and Kashmir out of U.N. list of disputes", and described it as "a huge set back for Pakistan" .. The UN had set the record straight the very next day, on November 16, 2010, when it clarified that Jammu and Kashmir dispute remained on its agenda and rejected such media reports as "inaccurate". .

 

[PDF]

UN

BTW, JFYI,
Article 103
In the event of a conflict between the obligations of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.
So Simla Agreement or any other will never encumber or impede UN resolutions.

 

[M. Sarmad]

BTW, JFYI,
Article 103
In the event of a conflict between the obligations of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.
So Simla Agreement or any other will never encumber or impede UN resolutions.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/the-...nes-by-dr-m-k-teng.440732/page-5#post-8584119

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

Quite the contrary, Jammu is the most affected area, esp. on the Indian side. There are over 400 villages on the Indian side in Jammu (predominantly Hindu/Sikh) that lie within 5 km of the border, and in 2014 alone, as per the Govt. of India Press Information Bureau, 73,368 people were displaced due to cross border exchange in the three districts of Jammu, Kathua and Samba.

Good. Hit the non Muslims in Jammu

 

[Mav3rick]

But the thing is where are those countries who are saying what India did is wrong and if there are any where do they stand on global stage? Turkey stands with Pakistan, but lets be honest, Turkey doesn't have any clout over any organization.

Quite frankly, why would any country be concerned about Kashmir?

The only real concern could potentially be on an India/Pakistan war which would have repercussions, lasting perhaps, over the entire region. The most worrying thing about that is the fact that once started, wars do not stay contained to the reason which started them and have the potential to spiral out of control.

Prolonged wars have the potential to rope in other countries and allies. And a severe war of attrition, ego and madness can go Nuclear, for either country.

 

[Areesh]

No Indian army fatalities in August so far.
Northern Army commander confirmed it.


We report in media even if a soldier gets minor injury and also report even ordinary accidental deaths in media.

Clearly your northern commander is lying

Now it is your time to bring those deaths out from random twitter and fb accounts like you normally do for Pakistani soldiers

Your Indian soldiers deserve it so that we don't hear about their deaths years later like it happened with those 4500 plus Indian soldiers who died at loc due to Pakistani firing

 

[Dash]

Lol this again

LOL is happening as we speak. Closed door consultations. LOL is the way forward for Pakistan.

 

[Areesh]

LOL is happening as we speak. Closed door consultations. LOL is the way forward for Pakistan.

That was a fake news. Don't share it again