What's new

India tries to hasten US defence deals amid election uncertainty

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...uncertainty/story-ftOK3CD4xMTWpxHwvgSM5K.html


the-guardian-maritime-predator-asi-variant-courtesy_0835038c-8ade-11e6-8186-8729fcb8a174.jpg



India is trying to hasten a deal with the United States to buy Predator drone aircraft for military surveillance, one of several defence and nuclear projects both sides are pursuing in the final months of the Obama administration.

“Our request for 22 Predator Guardian drones made in June is in an advanced stage of negotiations. We hope to make enough progress so only administrative tasks remain by the time President Barack Obama leaves office”, government officials in New Delhi said.

“It is progressing well. The aim is to complete the main process in the next few months,” said one of the officials, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has built personal ties with President Barack Obama, whose signature foreign policy move has been a strategic pivot to Asia from the Middle East.

The United States has dislodged Russia as the top arms supplier to India, with India also on the cusp of sealing a US nuclear reactor deal worth billions of dollars.

In return, US has given India access to high-end military technology, such as a new system to launch planes off aircraft carriers, and leaned on other countries to give India membership in the Missile Technology Control Regime, which cleared the way for the sale of the unarmed Predator.

Indian military has also asked for the armed version of the Predator to help target suspected militant camps in Pakistan but US export control laws prohibit such a transfer.

US defence secretary Ashton Carter, who visited India in April, is expected to make a final trip there towards the end of the year.

“The administration is eager to get as much done as is humanly possible. They believe the conditions and the personnel in India as well as in US are uniquely favourable at the moment, and are eager to consolidate and institutionalize the progress,” said Jeff Smith, director of Asia Security Programs at the American Foreign Policy Council.



laos-asean-summit-us-india_cdd77558-75d9-11e6-9bc1-888b3aba2d1d.jpg


US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s “America First” foreign policy statements have raised questions about a US pullback from Asia.

Trump has said US allies, such as Japan and South Korea, should pay more towards their defence. He told the New York Times in an interview in March he could withdraw US troops from bases in Japan, and raised the idea of letting Japan and South Korea develop their own nuclear arsenals.

“It is a serious concern, and may lead to Chinese pre-eminence in Asia far sooner than expected,” said Dhruva Jaishankar, a specialist on India-US ties at Brookings India.

But Trump adviser Walid Phares, an American scholar and expert on Islamist radicals and counter-terrorism, said India had no reason to worry.


“With India, there is the ongoing partnership against terror and both countries have suffered from jihadi urban attacks. One can only project cooperation,” Phares said.

Prime Minister’s office set up a six-member research group in July to help identify ways to engage with Trump, an aide said.

India’s diaspora in the United States, led by the Overseas Friends of Bharatiya Janata Party, has also opened a line to both presidential campaigns.

The comfort level is much higher with the Democratic candidate, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said a member of the Overseas Friends of BJP who is based in New Delhi.

Manoj Ladwa, a London-based political strategist who served as communications director for Modi’s 2014 campaign, said Trump had sent contradictory messages to India.

“On the one hand, he says he values business relations with India, but then mimics Indian call centre workers, and disregards the competitiveness that a partnership with India could provide the US,” he said.

“His unpredictability is worrisome in a world that requires steady and mature statesmanship.”





Strategic programmes

The centrepiece of the military collaboration is the help the United States is giving India in developing its biggest aircraft carrier.

US has offered flight launch technology that is being inducted into its own carriers to fly heavier fighter planes off the deck, which could allow the Indian navy to leapfrog a generation of technology.

In June, the United States reached agreement on exchanging confidential information on development of carriers, making India its only non-treaty ally with such an arrangement.

“They have already started helping us on our first indigenous carrier, in terms of certification, quality testing,” said the government official. “The challenge will be to sustain the momentum over the next decade.”


In August, India and US signed a logistics agreement giving each country access to the other’s military bases, after 10 years of negotiations. Also on the table are two other defence agreements, one on securing communications and the other on sharing spatial data that US has been pushing for.

Modi has shown he won’t hesitate to “reach down and choke someone,” to get things done, Smith at the American Foreign Policy Council said, quoting a Pentagon official.
 
Even if Obama leaves office prior to deals getting finalized, US relationship with India will continue with the next administration, whomever it may be.
 
I honestly hope India gets them from the US. I hope India does something crazy so that we can shoot these things out of the sky.
 
Lol , S70B , M777, have yet not happened and we are taking about quick Predetors.
 
“They have already started helping us on our first indigenous carrier, in terms of certification, quality testing,” said the government official. “The challenge will be to sustain the momentum over the next decade.”
Am I the only one who finds this description troublesome? Basically, US is under no obligation to improve India's aircraft carrier but she is at the perfect position to know its weaknesses.
 
Am I the only one who finds this description troublesome? Basically, US is under no obligation to improve India's aircraft carrier but she is at the perfect position to know its weaknesses.

What if I say there is no such government official in the first place ?

Well let me make a clarification , its an Italian firm which is helping us in our first aircraft carrier certification and other issues. Not a single American here.

You need to pay only a few dollars here in India to get news like this.

The only reliable piece about defence is what the government itself says.
 
Am I the only one who finds this description troublesome? Basically, US is under no obligation to improve India's aircraft carrier but she is at the perfect position to know its weaknesses.
Pretty much.
This Carrier is the first design by us. It is logical to think that it would have multiple flaws or design issues.

On the other hand US/West is the fore most expert on Carrier operations and standardized processes obtained over decades and decades of continuous R&D.

We are planning to build multiple carriers after this current one. It makes a lot of sense to learn as much a we can now before we build our main and bigger sized Carriers which with processes taken from US coupled design elements from Europeans and with our own experience in Vikramaditya and this Carrier would enable us to make a more efficient line of Carriers.
 
Pretty much.
This Carrier is the first design by us. It is logical to think that it would have multiple flaws or design issues.

On the other hand US/West is the fore most expert on Carrier operations and standardized processes obtained over decades and decades of continuous R&D.

We are planning to build multiple carriers after this current one. It makes a lot of sense to learn as much a we can now before we build our main and bigger sized Carriers which with processes taken from US coupled design elements from Europeans and with our own experience in Vikramaditya and this Carrier would enable us to make a more efficient line of Carriers.


If you are referring to " INS Vikrant " here then let it be clear. Its an Italian Firm assisting us, no Americans.

And also this design is in line with what were INs expectations from it and is projected to deliver even more than that.

The Italian firm has actually built carriers like this for Italy , and they are one of the best , with endurance , safety and sortie rates per day. And the same experience will benefit us here.


Coming to the Future , its not about EMALS, its about the nuclear reactors, the nation which gives it , India partners it.
 
No need to worry. Whoever will be in office next term will support India. I find it amusing Trump talks about withdrawing troops from Japan. If true, its a welcome development. Japanese can very well take care of their defence. Korea needs some help though.

Does Russia has any drones at all?
 
Am I the only one who finds this description troublesome? Basically, US is under no obligation to improve India's aircraft carrier but she is at the perfect position to know its weaknesses.

nice point
having said that India is no position to challenge the US Navy for next few decades
 
I honestly hope India gets them from the US. I hope India does something crazy so that we can shoot these things out of the sky.

Man they are flying and violating your air space for many years now, you can try to shoot them anytime...
 
No need to worry. Whoever will be in office next term will support India. I find it amusing Trump talks about withdrawing troops from Japan. If true, its a welcome development. Japanese can very well take care of their defence. Korea needs some help though.

Does Russia has any drones at all?
they were buying Israeli drones earlier, I don't think they have a mature drone program yet.
 
nice point
having said that India is no position to challenge the US Navy for next few decades
It isn't about whether India will challenge US. That is probably not a concern for most Indians. It is about what India would do should US challenge India. Of course, it is not my say on whether it should be a concern for Indians, too.
 
Back
Top Bottom