What's new

India tops Asia-Pacific political risk table in 09

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - India, Malaysia and Thailand face the highest political and social risk among Asia-Pacific countries in 2009, mainly because of internal instability, a political risk consultancy said.

India's highest risk score of 6.87 on a scale of 10 also reflected fears over Pakistan, the Hong Kong-based Political & Economic Risk Consultancy (PERC) said in a report, warning of social unrest and insecurity if things worsened in the neighbouring nation.

The consultancy assessed 16 countries on factors such as the risk of disruptive political change, the threat posed by social activism and vulnerability to policy changes by other governments.

A score of zero represented the best socio-political situation and 10 the highest risk.

Contributing to India's high score was uncertainty over the outcome of general elections next year, rising communal violence and increased militant attacks, PERC said in the report released on Monday.

"India, Thailand and Malaysia are not so much vulnerable to negative fallout from the global financial crisis as they are to factors that are mainly internal," Robert Broadfoot, managing director of PERC, told Reuters.

"For these countries, the coming global economic storm is only going to make a bad situation worse," he said.

"India's underlying attractions to foreign investors should remain no matter who wins the next election," the report said.

Thailand is the the second riskiest country in Asia for 2009 with a score of 6.28, as the current political turmoil threatens to drag into 2009 and is eroding the country's key institutions.

The consultancy projected Thailand's worst case scenario to be if the King of Thailand dies before the turmoil is resolved.

As for Malaysia, the third riskiest in the region, the report said the struggle for political power was aggravating racial and religious tensions.

"The status quo is changing in ways that will see a stronger political opposition than in the past," said the report.

Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Australia were ranked most stable and low in political risk for 2009 even though their economies are likely to be hurt by the global financial crisis, PERC said.

For the United States, being at the epicentre of the financial crisis has weakened the country economically and psychologically, PERC said.

The U.S. political and military profile will be lower than before and it will become less aggressive in pushing its views on other countries. In Asia, the U.S. may rely more on its regional allies such as Japan, Singapore and Australia to push its agenda.

China scored 5.33 on PERC's scale and the consultancy expects the world's most populous nation to have a difficult year in 2009 as the government tries to sustain economic momentum and boost domestic demand in the face of weaker export markets.

"Despite a desire to get average Chinese to spend more, layoffs in factories, weak stock prices and lower real estate prices in key markets like Shanghai are likely to make average Chinese turn more cautious in their consumption," said PERC.

India tops Asia-Pacific political risk table in 09 | Top News | Reuters
 
There must be something wrong here .... Bangladesh is not mentioned in the report. :coffee:

Unbelievable BD is actually safer than India. :enjoy:
 
There must be something wrong here .... Bangladesh is not mentioned in the report. :coffee:

No, nothing is wrong here, the reason why Bangladesh was not mentioned is because they only listed the top 3 nations.

Unbelievable BD is actually safer than India. :enjoy:

Yes, according to PERC.

Someone is in a happy mood today. :D
 
Countries in the report -

Australia
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Macao
Malaysia
he Philippines
Singapore
Korea
Taiwan
Thailand
US
Vietnam

http://www.asiarisk.com/exsum.pdf

So it seems that neither the Reuters or the PERC report considered BD a threat to itself or the region. India was however considered the most riskiest place next year.
 
There must be something wrong here .... Bangladesh is not mentioned in the report. :coffee:

Unbelievable BD is actually safer than India. :enjoy:

That is because BD foriegn investment is virtually nil. Mr. Munshi before posting an article understand it properly.

PERC put India as bigger risk for this year because of Pakistan deterioration economical and political conditions.

The biggest risk is that a deterioration in political and economic conditions in neighboring Pakistan could aggravate social unrest in India further and hurt national security.

It is not because of India, it because of its neighbors. That is what PERC is saying Mr. Munshi.
 
There must be something wrong here .... Bangladesh is not mentioned in the report. :coffee:

Unbelievable BD is actually safer than India. :enjoy:

Pakistan is not in the list, neither is Bangladesh, Myanmar, Laos etc.

The list only shows countries investors actually invest in. BD doesnt even make the list.
 
It is amazing that all the Indians here had concluded that BD is a failed state and is a threat to India but none of the international analyst thinks so. India is classified as highly risky because of internal problems and to some extent on the situation in Pakistan. India would probably be on top of the list if Pakistan was not in this situation.

I do not think it is necessarily a good thing to be on the list and certainly not at the top of it. What was one Indian saying about BB being number one on a particular list. Probably his derogatory remarks apply here. What say you Kingfisher99?

According to most surveys on poverty, human rights and risk perceptions India is really not a great place to be. BD is in far better situation.

Hopefully the Indians will now stop making idiotic remarks about BD.
 
It is amazing that all the Indians here had concluded that BD is a failed state and is a threat to India but none of the international analyst thinks so. India is classified as highly risky because of internal problems and to some extent on the situation in Pakistan. India would probably be on top of the list if Pakistan was not in this situation.

I do not think it is necessarily a good thing to be on the list and certainly not at the top of it. What was one Indian saying about BB being number one on a particular list. Probably his derogatory remarks apply here. What say you Kingfisher99?

According to most surveys on poverty, human rights and risk perceptions India is really not a great place to be. BD is in far better situation.

Hopefully the Indians will now stop making idiotic remarks about BD.


No matter how aggrevated you are, the main reason BD is not on the list because foreign investment is nil. It is very hard for you to accept this fact, and *** and rave like a small child. You are the one who put this post, and you expect to people agree with you. Never the less, the truth to the matter is India is higher on this list because of it neighbors, and like that does not say any good about your country.

Stop riding your high horse and come back to reality. Sir you are the one is making idiotic statements and no India will shut up, so don't even expect it.
 
Facts on Bangladesh of Risk:


The OECD risk rating of 6 (same as Indonesia, Pakistan) indicates high risk of external debt default. The ratings outlook is neutral, evenly balanced between favourable and unfavourable developments. Bangladesh shares the honour with Haiti of being ranked the most corrupt country in the world by Transparency International.

External liquidity is poor. At end-June 2004, official reserves stood at US$2.7b, equivalent to only 2.7 months' imports.

The country leads a chronic hand-to-mouth existence. Its high dependence upon multilateral and bilateral grants and soft loans means it is able to keep its external and public debt accumulation under reasonable control. But that dependence makes it vulnerable to withdrawal of aid for political reasons. Its vulnerability to such a withdrawal is high right now, because of escalating political and sectarian violence (see below). Even when it is persona grata with donors, it is forced every year to go cap in hand to them.

The lifting of quotas under the Multi-Fibre Agreement (MFA) at the beginning of 2005 will be a setback, given Bangladesh's dependence on RMG (ready-made garment) exports. Bangladesh is the world's No 1 T-shirt exporter and RMGs account for three-quarters of exports. With intensified competition, the country is likely to lose significant market share in the United States. This will be offset to some extent by a pick-up of market share in the high volume, low-margin segment that China is increasingly having to relinquish. The country will also benefit from efforts by RMG buyers to diversify their sources away from exporters in China and India. Still, a repetition of Bangladesh's negative experience through September 2003 following the lifting of a portion of MFA quotas suggests some hardship and adjustment are in store. In that earlier episode, exports to the US & EU of products whose quotas were removed plunged 40%

Politics, always ugly in Bangladesh, have recently become uglier. For over a year now, the government (led by the Bangladesh National Party) has been in increasing confrontation with the opposition party (the Awami League). Since its 2001 election victory, groups linked to the BNP-led coalition have been encouraging violence against the country's non-Muslim minorities. A pattern of arrests and assassinations of the government's political opponents has also emerged. Prime Minister Khaleda Zia of the BNP has not responded to the allegations and has encouraged political instability by forcing the resignation of the independently minded President Badruddoza Chowdhury and purging the judiciary of senior appointees who don't support her. The opposition has staged several nationwide strikes in protest at the government's actions. There were 20 of them last year and already two have taken place this year. The last one, prompted by a grenade attack on an Awami League rally, has just ended. Not only do these strikes bring the economy to a standstill; many observers believe that their attendant violence has now reached the point where it is putting the integrity of the state at risk. Worse, political violence is expected to escalate in the run-up to elections scheduled for 2006. Bangladeshi politics will remain characterised by instability over the foreseeable future, as the Awami League refuses to accept the legitimacy of the BNP-led coalition government. (See Annex below for more background.)

Sectarian violence, linked to the political violence, is also on the rise. The BNP has been criticised for turning a blind eye to the wave of domestic Islamist terrorism directed at non-Muslims, because it needs the support of Islamists and Islamist parties to stay elected and achieve a majority in the legislature.
At present, Bangladesh is in a delicate equilibrium that could be disturbed by either political and sectarian violence or, more favourably, further efforts to stabilise debt and revitalise the structural reform agenda.


Annex - Political And Sectarian Violence
Prime Minister Khaleda Zia of the BNP and the Awami League's Sheikh Hasina Wajed have long been enemies. Since the BNP joined forces with Islamist parties to form a government in 2001, extremist groups linked to these parties have stepped up attacks on non-Muslim minorities and the Awami League, the main political promoter of secularism. In addition, Zia has used draconian security and sedition laws to crack down on the opposition. Hasina is the daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rehman, who led the 1971 liberation struggle against Pakistan and was the country's first president. Mujibur was assassinated in 1975 by army officers associated with Zia's husband, General Ziaur Rehman, who later became president before being assassinated himself in 1981. Since they became leaders of their respective parties, Hasina and Zia have constantly tried to undermine each other's governments when in opposition.

The Awami League supports secularism, and in particular the country's 11% Hindu minority. Since the 1980s, Bangladeshi society has been affected by the rise of Islamic fundamentalism throughout South Asia. Madrassahs (Islamic schools) and welfare societies have mushroomed, some pushing radical doctrines and attacking secularism and secularists. When the Awami League won the 1996 general election, the BNP and the Islamists found common cause in opposing Hasina's government. The protest movement they organised had a distinctly Islamist character. Moreover, after the BNP won the 2001 general election, it formed an alliance with the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami (Jamaat) and the Islamia Okiye Jote (IOJ) parties. The Jamaat and IOJ are alleged to have subsequently intensified their arms purchases and escalated violence against non-Muslims.

http://www.efic.gov.au/static/efi/cra/bangladesh.htm


And Mr. Munshi after reading this, if you tell me that this 2-3 years old. Well just to let you know this is the latest that i have found about your country. If you can find up to date, please post it because i want to see how much improvement you have made. Regards
 
Last edited:
mr munshi first of all wishing u a happy diwali . the following report applies only to those nations which have some signaficant fdi so it doesnt really matter .second its only a risk assessment . the political situation in india is volatile but that is a part of every democratically elected govt tell me if bd is any different.mr munshi nice if you posted some pro indo bangla stuff.ciao
 
And Mr. Munshi after reading this, if you tell me that this 2-3 years old. Well just to let you know this is the latest that i have found about your country. If you can find up to date, please post it because i want to see how much improvement you have made. Regards

You are right they are too old to be of any use as indicators of present economic performance for Bangladesh. There are new figures or analysis but the dire predictions made in 2005 did not come true.
 
You are right they are too old to be of any use as indicators of present economic performance for Bangladesh. There are new figures or analysis but the dire predictions made in 2005 did not come true.

Dire predictions often have a way of not coming true. I think this is because a lot of these dire predictions are based on the worst possible chain of events occuring, and that of course, is very rare.

I hope everyone keeps that in mind when posting articles about dire consequences to be faced by any nation.
 
warning of social unrest and insecurity if things worsened in the neighbouring nation.

The consultancy assessed 16 countries on factors such as the risk of disruptive political change, the threat posed by social activism and vulnerability to policy changes by other governments.

in other countries, we have contibued to say that India gets bogged down by nuissance ridden small nations surrounding it. Not Pakistan.

Contributing to India's high score was uncertainty over the outcome of general elections next year, rising communal violence and increased militant attacks, PERC said in the report released on Monday.


I dont think there is anything really drastic mentioned in this report, elections, relegious unrest and militant attacks all are very much a part of our lives now a days and to which we are very aware off.

"India, Thailand and Malaysia are not so much vulnerable to negative fallout from the global financial crisis as they are to factors that are mainly internal," Robert Broadfoot, managing director of PERC, told Reuters. "For these countries, the coming global economic storm is only going to make a bad situation worse," he said.

Lets see who gets hurt the maximum.

"India's underlying attractions to foreign investors should remain no matter who wins the next election," the report said.

And there....
 
Countries in the report -

Australia
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Macao
Malaysia
he Philippines
Singapore
Korea
Taiwan
Thailand
US
Vietnam

http://www.asiarisk.com/exsum.pdf.

Most of the countries here are far ahead of India which can be seen by a nakd eye.

So it seems that neither the Reuters or the PERC report considered BD a threat to itself or the region. India was however considered the most riskiest place next year.

Whats wrong with you? BD was not a part of the study at all, probably they thought its not worth the effort.
 
Most of the countries here are far ahead of India which can be seen by a nakd eye.

Bull after all these years you still talk crap.

India presents itself as a leading economy and military power in the world but you admit it is far behind the other countries on the list.

Apparently India cannot live up to its own BS.

Whats wrong with you? BD was not a part of the study at all, probably they thought its not worth the effort.

India spends so much time denigrating its neighbor but the world still doesn't take notice. I think this is a clear case of India over doing the BS. Other countries just do not believe it anymore.
 
Back
Top Bottom