What's new

India rules out troops in Afghanistan

BHarwana

MODERATOR
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
24,827
Reaction score
20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
NEW DELHI: India has ruled out sending its troops to Afghanistan but will continue to provide assistance in other fields, Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said here on Tuesday.

Her remarks were significant because they were made in the presence of visiting US Secretary of Defence James Mattis. Neither the United States nor Afghanistan is believed to be pressing India to send troops to Kabul. Both sides are believed to be aware of the logistical challenge that transporting of troops and military hardware to the landlocked country would pose.

However, the issue surged in importance following a media comment by Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi in New York last week when he said India had a zero political or military role in Afghanistan.

“There shall not be any boots on the ground from India,” Ms Sitharaman said in response to questions at a joint press conference with Mr Mattis.

She said India would, however, continue its development and medical assistance to Afghanistan.

There has been unsubstantiated enthusiasm in the Indian media about India deploying troops in Afghanistan after US President Donald Trump called for greater Indian involvement in the war-torn country.

The Hindu said after delegation-level discussions between the two sides, India and the US also resolved to eradicate safe havens for terrorists across the globe.

“There can be no tolerance of terrorist safe havens. As global leaders, India and the US resolve to work together to eradicate this scourge,” Mr Mattis said in a statement.

With increasing Chinese presence in the region, both sides discussed boosting their expanding maritime cooperation.

Mr Mattis landed in India on Monday for his maiden three-day visit, the first by a cabinet member of the Trump administration.

The Hindu said India already extended a $3-billion aid to Afghanistan and also “provides training to its military and other assistance”.

Agencies add: Mattis’ trip to India is the first by any member of President Donald Trump’s cabinet. It comes just after Trump unveiled a new Afghanistan strategy and urged New Delhi to help.

“We applaud India’s invaluable contributions to Afghanistan and welcome further efforts to promote Afghanistan’s democracy, stability and security,” Mattis said.

India has long vied with arch-rival Pakistan for influence in Afghanistan, building dams, roads and a new parliament in the troubled country. Last year it offered some $1 billion in aid.

It has also trained more than 4,000 Afghan National Army officers and provided helicopters to the Afghan Air Force.

“There can be no tolerance of terrorist safe havens,” Mattis said, without referencing Pakistan.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1360351/india-rules-out-troops-in-afghanistan
 
.
Fauji na bhejna Taliban bahuuut maray gaaa.

U.S. pressure fails to change India's non-military stance on Afghanistan

NEW DELHI, Sept. 26 (Xinhua) -- Although India and the United States have deepened their bilateral cooperation and emerged as global partners in areas of strategic concerns, experts said that India on Tuesday sent out a strong geopolitical message by refusing to accede to the U.S. request to send military troops in Afghanistan.

Visiting U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis emphasized on India's role in fighting global terror and thus sought its boots in the war-ravaged Afghanistan. This comes close to U.S. President Donald Trump's policy announcement on Afghanistan wherein he ordered a modest increase in presence of American military forces in the region, not as part of "nation building" but "killing terrorists."

Thus, while the U.S. finds it hard to pull out of its 16-year-old war, India has taken a "welcome and significant step" in the opposite direction. It is understood that Indian Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman categorically told her American counterpart that India will not commit to sending any soldiers in Afghanistan and would rather expand its developmental footprint in the region.

"The U.S. has time and again persuaded India in this regard. That India remains firm on its stand of zero political and military role in Afghanistan is a sign of its healthy relationship with the country and its larger South Asian policy. India is committed to stabilizing the nation and believes that army measures cannot do the same," said Gopal S. Swamy, a Delhi-based expert on Indo-U.S. relations.

"India started to provide training to Afghan police officers and army cadets to build its internal security. It undertook small but significant developmental projects across the country then in areas of irrigation, housing and education," said Prof Ajay Sharma, another Delhi-based expert.

"India was never interested in playing a military role and it reiterated its stand again by turning down U.S. request," said Kanika Sinha, a retired Delhi University professor.

Many believe that India is walking on thin ice by denying military role in Afghanistan especially because it was making billions of dollars in trade with the United States, making the latter expect India's assistance in the region in return.

Experts feel that by refusing such a role, India could jeopardise its economic and trade benefits and the larger U.S.-India friendship which has seen significant development over the last few years. Mattis' visit itself coincided with Indo-Afghan trade and investment show which is being supported by the USAID and Indian Ministry of External Affairs.

"India's firm stand has set an example for others to lead on with by promising inclusive development and helping hand to a country that has been torn apart by war and conflict," Sinha added.


http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-09/27/c_136640545.htm
 
. .
So this is how they fight against terrorism lol. Talk talk and when comes to sending troop oh sorry. Talk is cheap these days.
This is a good thing. They are learning from the mistakes of the USSR and the USA. The Afghans dont want to fight and re-take their country themselves so why should India sacrifice the lives of their soldiers to help them?
 
.
Good.

This proves those cowards know that with their inferior military tech, they're likely to have very high casualties.

Good message to send everyone.
 
. .
Good.

This proves those cowards know that with their inferior military tech, they're likely to have very high casualties.

Good message to send everyone.

or y'know they might have just learnt from the experience of other countries in Afghanistan?
 
. . .
No need to send troops to the cess pool called Afghanistan.
It has become a ghetto now.
But humanitarian assistance should be provided to the innocent citizens still living in this hell hole.
Pakistan has abandoned Afghanistan but India should provide assistance to those who deserve it.
 
. . . .
Good.

This proves those cowards know that with their inferior military tech, they're likely to have very high casualties.

Good message to send everyone.

Yes indeed a good message,
Indian blood is not cheap,

unlike some countries who fight war of others (WOT) for decades loosing life of fellow countrymen and trust of its citizens.

unlike some cowards who let others come and bomb its citizens/ soldiers
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom