What's new

India rebels 'got corporate fund'

Spring Onion

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
41,403
Reaction score
19
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
India rebels 'got corporate fund'

A top Maoist leader in India has alleged to have received regular funds for his party from leading corporate houses, the BBC has learnt.

The details were given by Narla Ravi Sharma, a senior leader in the states of Bihar and Jharkhand, to the police after his arrest a fortnight ago.

The BBC is in possession of Mr Sharma's "preliminary interrogation report".

The Maoists operate in many states and say they are fighting for the rights of the poor and landless.

India says that Maoist insurgents pose its biggest security threat.

'Monthly wages'

"Many big companies regularly pay a levy to our parties in both Bihar and Jharkhand," Mr Sharma is quoted as saying in the interrogation report.



Mr Sharma was arrested a fortnight ago (Photo: Dilip Verma)
The Maoist leader named some of the companies - most have huge interests in mining and manufacturing and are prominent on India's stock markets.

But the BBC is not in a position to reveal those who have been named because of legal considerations.

Jharkhand police say Mr Sharma has been in charge of the Bihar and Jharkhand Special Area Committee, which forms part of the Maoists' Eastern Regional Bureau (ERB), since 1997.

He is quoted as saying that the annual expenditure incurred by the Maoists in the Bihar-Jharkhand region is around $200,000.

The Maoist leader said that all their members were paid monthly "wages", though he refused to divulge how much.

Mr Sharma was arrested in mid-October along with his wife, Anuradha, from the forests near Hazaribagh town in Jharkhand.

His revelations about corporate funding of Maoists has prompted police and intelligence officials to suggest that the massive military effort planned against the rebels will not yield the desired results unless their "finance line" is choked .

This is not the first time Indian firms doing business in rebel-dominated areas have been accused of funding the rebels.

In the 1980s and 1990s big tea and oil companies were accused of regularly giving funds to the separatist United Liberation Front of Assam and the National Democratic Front of Bodoland in the north-east.

Corporates generally pay up to avoid disruption or abductions - and business leaders say that the government should not punish them unless they can provide security to companies operating in Maoist-affected areas.

BBC NEWS | South Asia | India rebels 'got corporate fund'
 
.
Not its like corporate is funding the maoists...its the extorsion money the maoists rebel extract from the corporates as who have big mines and manufacturing units in the maoist infested but minerally very rich belts of india to aviod disruption of industrial outputs.

Its also the same corporate india who is forcing GOI to eliminate the maoist menace for ever as they are tired and sick up paying hepty sums of money to these communist bandits
 
.
yes i feel the choice of words is not right but again its same situation like we have here viz viz terrorists from TTP but the only difference is here the companies are not paying any money to TTP people unless they abduct someone and then demand ransom.
 
.
I have to agree with khajur - Its not corporate funding rather it is Extortion / Blackmail money which the corporates pay to do business in those areas.

If these companies do not payup there is a chance that the workers might be kidnapped or production be disrupted.

Only way to prevent this is eliminate naxalism by providing better opportunities to the local people and wean them away from extremism.
 
.
Same is the case with Taliban as they get their finances from the flourishing opium fields.. there is always a source to fund these "terrorizers" (as the Bush says...)
 
.
Khajur is correct. During the days of Ulfa, similar allegations were leveled at tea companies based in Assam. Ulfa would threaten to abduct company employees, usually high ranking officers, unless they were paid the 'protection money'. The companies obliged because it was cheaper for them to pay 'protection money' than 'ransom money' and also helped them to avoid bad press.

It is not a case of 'funding' but extortion.
 
.

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom