What's new

India Needs a Million Mother Teresas; Celebrating Her Sainthood Isn't Enough

Respect? and yet you comment on Christianity and no nothing about it ! that funny!

My comments has been in the context of christian , church and western propaganda about "Saint" theresa. Hardly actions that needs my respect.

In any case I am not seeking your approval. (or anybody's for that matter).
 
india needs hospitals, not houses of gods.
 
My comments has been in the context of christian , church and western propaganda about "Saint" theresa. Hardly actions that needs my respect.

In any case I am not seeking your approval. (or anybody's for that matter).
Saint Theresa has DONE alot more than all of us combine! and for me its cowardice to degrade anyone when that person isn't alive and can't defend oneself
 
Saint Theresa has DONE alot more than all of us combine! and for me its cowardice to degrade anyone when that person isn't alive and can't defend oneself

Ms. Theresa has done some good work and some bad like other leaders of our time. I am not sure in the overall scheme of things, she has been good for India. In her death she is certainly been bad for India.

You are entitled to your opinion.

However if someone can be praised and canonised in their death, it makes it fair to criticise and demonize them in their death too. Double standards are hard to defend :P
 
Wow now is called societal discrimination and that is acceptable?

"
When did I call it acceptable? on acceptability part, britishers were the first one who ordered and undertook the first caste based census in pre-independence India. A practice that made it mandatory to reveal their surname (or caste) in any govt record. A practice that still exists. If at all, it was the britishers who made this look acceptable.

Saint Theresa has DONE alot more than all of us combine! and for me its cowardice to degrade anyone when that person isn't alive and can't defend oneself
Maybe, but the reason for that was always propagating Christianity. How does it call charity when a good amount of money and efforts were spent in publishing and distributing pictorial books on jesus and his miracles in schools? had it been truly for humanity, the same money could have been spent in tending to the poor. In such case,Patanjali is doing a lot more charity work than all missionaries combined, without cajoling anyone to embrace hinduism and convert.
 
When did I call it acceptable? on acceptability part, britishers were the first one who ordered and undertook the first caste based census in pre-independence India. A practice that made it mandatory to reveal their surname (or caste) in any govt record. A practice that still exists. If at all, it was the britishers who made this look acceptable.

What the british did was CREATE a CASTE based population by using the census where various JAATIS and VARNAS were mapped and forced into the Four Castes they created.

One good thing that came out of this was the categorisation of Out Castes i.e. Dalits. It paved way for them to come back into Indian society. (after islamic invasion)
 
When did I call it acceptable? on acceptability part, britishers were the first one who ordered and undertook the first caste based census in pre-independence India. A practice that made it mandatory to reveal their surname (or caste) in any govt record. A practice that still exists. If at all, it was the britishers who made this look acceptable.
So now we blame the british ? So 70 years of independence, no one bothered to change this?

Maybe, but the reason for that was always propagating Christianity. How does it call charity when a good amount of money and efforts were spent in publishing and distributing pictorial books on jesus and his miracles in schools? had it been truly for humanity, the same money could have been spent in tending to the poor. In such case,Patanjali is doing a lot more charity work than all missionaries combined, without cajoling anyone to embrace hinduism and convert.

Patanjali , where the Guru has his own private plane? and only say it going to charity
 
So now we blame the british ? So 70 years of independence, no one bothered to change this?

It is now hard coded into the constitution of India and it cannot be removed without a constitutional amendment. It was the british who created it and put it there in the first place and the successive generations of Indians grew up ignorant and cheered while Ambedkar stamped it into the constitution post Independence.

How can you blame others when you yourself were ignorant of this ? LOL.
 
So now we blame the british ? So 70 years of independence, no one bothered to change this?



Patanjali , where the Guru has his own private plane? and only say it going to charity
1. No, I don't blame the british. I just connected the dots. Wherever there is a discrimination, there is a christian connection. And yes, Dr ambedkar, not mother teresa, bought about the change.

2. Pope is having the biggest mansion in the world, and controls the biggest and richest conglomerate of Christianity, doling out sainthood to normal people from his own country ("holy see" recognized as a sovereign entity). And they say charity!
 
It is now hard coded into the constitution of India and it cannot be removed without a constitutional amendment. It was the british who created it and put it there in the first place and the successive generations of Indians grew up ignorant and cheered while Ambedkar stamped it into the constitution post Independence.

How can you blame others when you yourself were ignorant of this ? LOL.
so its is acceptable that social discrimination is part of India because its written in our constitution? and we should be happy abt this?

1. No, I don't blame the british. I just connected the dots. Wherever there is a discrimination, there is a christian connection. And yes, Dr ambedkar, not mother teresa, bought about the change.

2. Pope is having the biggest mansion in the world, and controls the biggest and richest conglomerate of Christianity, doling out sainthood to normal people from his own country ("holy see" recognized as a sovereign entity). And they say charity!
LOL !!!! wow talk abt level of ignorance !

So when there is social discrimination against the dalits , and so those ppl in the media thrashing all those ppl over cow smuggling - we are to blame! ??

Pope - biggest manison? Highest level of ignorance!! lol! u know where the pope is from? do some basic research before commenting


How does the pope travel ? Unlike the pope who's bank launders drug money, Baba Ramdev does not own even a single stock in Patanjali.
baba Ramdev does not own even a single stock and yet he can afford a private plane .Tell me who founded Patanjali Ayurved
 
baba Ramdev does not own even a single stock and yet he can afford a private plane .Tell me who founded Patanjali Ayurved

Its his money, his company , he can do what ever the fcuk he wants. When you are getting money from donations, you CANNOT do what ever the fcuk you want. In principle you have to do what you promised you would do with the donations. Missionaries of charity is the only org. which does not publish accounts of where they spend their money...
 
so its is acceptable that social discrimination is part of India because its written in our constitution? and we should be happy abt this?


LOL !!!! wow talk abt level of ignorance !

So when there is social discrimination against the dalits , and so those ppl in the media thrashing all those ppl over cow smuggling - we are to blame! ??

Pope - biggest manison? Highest level of ignorance!! lol! u know where the pope is from? do some basic research before commenting



baba Ramdev does not own even a single stock and yet he can afford a private plane .Tell me who founded Patanjali Ayurved
I don't think you are learned enough to carry out any sane discussion. Isn't Holy see a sovereign state? who runs it? not pope? how does pope travel? even the POTUS bow to him. absolute power!

Give me one reason to justify powers of pope. Can he do miracles? do you believe in him or not?
 
so its is acceptable that social discrimination is part of India because its written in our constitution? and we should be happy abt this?

Evangelicalism and conversion to Christianity will certainly not change our constitution :lol:

You are not required to be happy about ANY discrimination. Against the fat, the ugly, the bald, the dark, the blind etc. etc. But you certainly seems to be happy about the discrimination against the Lazy or the Stupid that is sanctioned by the constitution.

baba Ramdev does not own even a single stock and yet he can afford a private plane .Tell me who founded Patanjali Ayurved

No need to ask me. A simple google search would have told you that Patanjali is owned by Mr. Balakrishana.

acharya-balkrishna-patanjali-food-park_061815120715.jpg


The real question is why is your @ss of fire when Ramdev flys around ?
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom