India Developing system to launch counter nuclear strike from anywhere at a

[livingdead]

If you dont know about something, better not to blame anybody. What Mr Chander saab has said is true. And lemme tell u...the second strike will be from something which you least expect. It can hit anywhere in the world. Work has been started and for it to mature, it takes around 15 years approx . Personally, I feel it will be completed in 8 - 10 years.

i know nothing ..but know how to detect bs .. and drdo is full of bs..

 

[StormShadow]

i know nothing ..but know how to detect bs .. and drdo is full of bs..

The first and last part of your sentence correlate well.

 

[Speeder 2]

New chief of India's military research complex reveals brave new mandate



DRDO's new chief Dr Avinash Chander.


Dr Chander, formerly director with the Advanced Systems Laboratory (ASL) in Hyderabad and renowned as the spearhead of the Agni family of missiles, was made chief of the DRDO last month.

India's current land-based nuclear weapon delivery systems include the 1,250-km range Agni-I, 2,000-km range Agni-II and 3,500-km range Agni-III. The DRDO chief has expressed confidence that 2 of India's two most ambitious nuclear missiles under test, the 4,000-km range Agni-IV and 6,000+ km range Agni-V, will both be inducted into the strategic arsenal within two years.

"We'll induct the Agni IV and V inducted in the next two years. It's the first time we will be inducting strategic missiles with such long ranges together. Agni III, IV and V are going to be the thrust areas. They give us the reach which we need, and are our highest priority now. Within two years we have to make sure that it happens," said Dr Chander.

Asked about whether India needed an inter-continental ballistic missile (ICBM), with ranges in excess of 10,000-km like China's DF-31 and other in-development weapons, Dr Chander said his missile laboratories could develop and deploy an ICBM in as little as three-five years. "As we see today, we don't find the need for ranges more than 5,000-6,000 km. The technology building blocks required to build a longer range missile already exist. We are in a position to activate any such system at very short notice," said Dr Chander.

An Inter Continental Baliistic Missile (ICBM), the Agni V reportedly has a range of 5,500-5,800 kms.


Asked about how India's missile programme squared off against China's, he said, "Comparisons are odious, always difficult, and many times taken out of context. If you see at the capability level, our missiles, radars are comparable with the Chinese and other friends around us."


Read more at: [url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/indias-nuclear-counterstrike-response-time-to-be-in-minutes-drdo-chief/1/286691.html]New chief of India's military research complex reveals brave new mandate : India, News - India Today[/url]


Read more at: [url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/indias-nuclear-counterstrike-response-time-to-be-in-minutes-drdo-chief/1/286691.html]New chief of India's military research complex reveals brave new mandate : India, News - India Today[/url][/QUOTE]




Comparable to China DF-31? :rofl:

:disagree:

DRTROLL is in the league of its own. The BS of this Dr Chanda is off the charts!


Let’s see,

--DRTROLL has no clue whatsoever on hyper speed re-entry design tech AND related complex material tech based on many sectors of very advanced heavy industry, of which India has close to zero.

--DRTROLL has no clue whatsoever on miniature tech, which took US Russia and China decades to master. In fact DRTROLL is not even at the 101 entry level.

--DRTROLL has no clue whatsoever on advanced guidance system design tech AND manufacturing tech.

--DRTROLL has no clue whatsoever on advance fuel tech that beyond primitive 1st gen fuel.

Agni V, DRTROLL’s best, is capability-wise similar to China’s long-retired DF 5 which was deployed in 70s and 80s…even so Agni V & DF 5 are not direct comparable , because:

…DF-5 was tested countless times, accurate, reliable, decades in service, hence proven. It was designed and manufactured by and in China, every bit of it.

...while Agni V, however, is still in trial stage let alone being proven reliable yet.

…moreover, ALL important technologies of Agni V are designed by AND imported from Russia (you wonder why Agni project is so expansive? Because it buys from Russia. Of course expansive) , that include beyong primittive 1st gen fuel, all mission-critical super hard alloys , all mission-critical super high temp alloys, the mission-critical laser gyro guidance system, more advanced materials for making 2nd and 3rd stages rocket shells to avoid melting, etc. just to name a few.


India’s missile tech (advanced knowhow, design, manufacturing, reliability, capability) is AT LEAST 30 years behind China, considering most of Agni V tech are bought directly from Russia.

The real gap however, All (from a to z) made-in-India Vs All (from a to z) made-in-China, is more likely to be 40 years to half a century!

Comparing Agni V to DF-31 is like comparing a foreign TOT-ed 3-wheel tuktuk, that is still at trial stage :hitwall: , to a German-made Audi running on autobahns for years.

 

[senkakudefender]

Comparable to China DF-31?



DRTROLL is in the league of its own. The BS of this Dr Chanda is off the charts!


Let’s see,

--DRTROLL has no clue whatsoever on hyper speed re-entry design tech AND related complex material tech based on many sectors of very advanced heavy industry, of which India has close to zero.

--DRTROLL has no clue whatsoever on miniature tech, which took US Russia and China decades to master. In fact DRTROLL is not even at the 101 entry level.

--DRTROLL has no clue whatsoever on advanced guidance system design tech AND manufacturing tech.

--DRTROLL has no clue whatsoever on advance fuel tech that beyond primitive 1st gen fuel.

Agni V, DRTROLL’s best, is capability-wise similar to China’s long-retired DF 5 which was deployed in 70s and 80s…even so Agni V & DF 5 are not direct comparable , because:

…DF-5 was tested countless times, accurate, reliable, decades in service, hence proven. It was designed and manufactured by and in China, every bit of it.

...while Agni V, however, is still in trial stage let alone being proven reliable yet.

…moreover, ALL important technologies of Agni V are designed by AND imported from Russia (you wonder why Agni project is so expansive? Because it buys from Russia. Of course expansive) , that include beyong primittive 1st gen fuel, all mission-critical super hard alloys , all mission-critical super high temp alloys, the mission-critical laser gyro guidance system, more advanced materials for making 2nd and 3rd stages rocket shells to avoid melting, etc. just to name a few.


India’s missile tech (advanced knowhow, design, manufacturing, reliability, capability) is AT LEAST 30 years behind China, considering most of Agni V tech are bought directly from Russia.

The real gap however, All (from a to z) made-in-India Vs All (from a to z) made-in-China, is more likely to be 40 years to half a century!

Comparing Agni V to DF-31 is like comparing a foreign TOT-ed 3-wheel tuktuk, that is still at trial stage , to a German-made Audi running on autobahns for years.

China accuses India of undermining Agni-V missile capabilities | Mail Online

PUBLISHED: 19:43 GMT, 20 April 2012

Thursday's successful launch of the Agni- V missile continued to rattle China which has now claimed that India has deliberately downplayed its capability.
While India said the missile can cover a distance of over 5,000 kilometres, Chinese researchers felt the missile has the potential to reach targets 8,000 km away.
"The Agni-V actually has the potential to reach targets 8,000 km away, but the Indian government had deliberately downplayed the missile's capability in order to avoid causing concern to other countries," Du Wenlong, a researcher at China's PLA Academy of Military Sciences, told the Global Times on Friday.

Expressing similar sentiments, Zhang Zhaozhong, a professor with the PLA National Defence University told the Global Times: "According to China's standard, an ICBM should have a range of at least 8,000 km.
"The Agni-V's range could be further enhanced to become an Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile." On Thursday, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Liu Weimin had tried to downplay the missile launch.
"China and India are both emerging powers. We are not rivals but co-operative partners. We should cherish the hardearned momentum of co-operation," Liu had told the media in Beijing following the missile test.
The US, which has tried to project India as a counterweight to China, refused to criticise New Delhi for the missile launch.
"I would simply point out, because comparisons have been made to the DPRK (North Korea) and its actions, that India's record stands in stark contrast to that of North Korea," White House spokesman Jay Carney said in Washington.
The success of Agni-V has, meanwhile, opened up possibilities for the Indian defence scientists to step into the domain where they could come up with a single ballistic missile to eliminate multiple targets, launch mini satellites and destroy "enemy" satellites in the orbit.
Agni-V is a single warhead missile but it will help the ongoing Multiple Independently Targetable Re-Entry Vehicle (MIRV) project whose primary modules are at an advanced stage of development, Avinash Chander, chief controller (missiles and strategic systems) of the DRDO, said.

 

[Speeder 2]

^^ so, still made-in-Russia, Russia's 70's old tech, albeit with a slightly more range, isn't it?

 

[kurup]

^^ so, still made-in-Russia, Russia's 70's old tech, albeit with a slightly more range, isn't it?

Why are you talking about chinese missiles here ??? ............

The topic is not china . Don't post offtopic cr@p.

 

[janon]

^^ so, still made-in-Russia, Russia's 70's old tech, albeit with a slightly more range, isn't it?

No, it isn't.