What's new

India and UNSC permanent seat

IMHO, India is unnecessarily offending China in every front. It's GOI not average Indian members here.

Such as the thread" India join Brazil and S.Africa to from a bloc, etc ", it's the Chinese ask SA come into BRICS to feed its own interest, but India's stupid excuse of proposing such a 3 nation bloc is "we are the largest democracy of each continent"....

OMG, GOI hired very low IQ guys in foreign affires.
 
US should back India for UNSC: American expert


Washington: The Obama administration should announce its support for a permanent seat for India on the UN Security Council during Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's visit to the White House next week, a US expert contends.



Although it would produce no immediate results, the bold declaration would signal New Delhi's growing importance to Washington, and the Obama administration's recognition of the changing global centre of gravity, says a new policy brief by Ashley J Tellis, senior associate at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

During Manmohan Singh's visit, both countries will likely announce new programmes in areas ranging from agriculture to counter-terrorism, medicine, energy, trade and more.

But Tellis, who advised the previous Bush administration on the landmark India-US civil nuclear deal, identifies two areas where cooperation will be most challenging, and most vital: non-proliferation and climate change.

Contending that India is unlikely to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), he said this would leave a strong possibility that even if the US ratifies the agreement, it will never come into force.

Noting that India's integration into the global non-proliferation regime remains incomplete, Tellis suggested that the US should work to integrate India into global non-proliferation institutions, including the Proliferation Security Initiative, the Nuclear Suppliers Group, Australia Group, and the Zangger Committee.

Though it shares American concerns over Iran's nuclear ambitions, India has not been asked to do much about the Iranian programme, he said suggesting "The Obama administration should persuade New Delhi to pressure Tehran to remain engaged in international negotiations, in hopes of achieving a peaceful resolution."

Obama's nuclear security summit next year will be a golden opportunity for the United States and India to collaborate on universal nuclear security standards, Teliis said, "but New Delhi will need to overcome its misplaced anxieties about discussing its nuclear programme in public".

On climate change, Tellis said if Obama focuses on persuading Manmohan Singh to commit to a binding carbon dioxide emissions cap or a multilateral treaty, there will be little hope for cooperation on climate change.

Instead, the US and India should focus on practical initiatives to reduce emissions and improve efficiency in the realms of agriculture, transportation, and infrastructure, he said, suggesting Washington should give India access to priority technologies that could reduce its emissions growth.

India is not yet convinced that it can play an important role in combating climate change, and does not want to jeopardise its economic growth, Tellis said. "But economic progress and sustainable development are compatible, as little-noticed programmes by the Singh government have proven," he added.

IANS

Accepting India in any position is like allowing criminals to sit on juries since India is violating many of the UN's own resolutions.
 
IMHO, India is unnecessarily offending China in every front. It's GOI not average Indian members here.

Such as the thread" India join Brazil and S.Africa to from a bloc, etc ", it's the Chinese ask SA come into BRICS to feed its own interest, but India's stupid excuse of proposing such a 3 nation bloc is "we are the largest democracy of each continent"....

OMG, GOI hired very low IQ guys in foreign affires.

I don't think China takes offense at Indian attempts at becoming a permanent member of the UNSC. We merely follow the development with a fair amout of amusement. Take Japan for example. Bear in mind that Japan started its campaign about twenty years ago when it was already the second largest economy and the second biggest contributor to the UN. US made all the right noises as well. What happened to Japan twenty years later? It is still on the outside looking in. Presentday India is nowhere near what Japan was twenty years ago. Go figure.
 
I don't think China takes offense at Indian attempts at becoming a permanent member of the UNSC. We merely follow the development with a fair amout of amusement. Take Japan for example. Bear in mind that Japan started its campaign about twenty years ago when it was already the second largest economy and the second biggest contributor to the UN. US made all the right noises as well. What happened to Japan twenty years later? It is still on the outside looking in. Presentday India is nowhere near what Japan was twenty years ago. Go figure.

totally agreed.
 
still the bashing goes on with every thread, good its no use to bring hostile entites to a table for a cup of coffee, both of us will throw the coffee cups are each other.:hitwall:
 
India is not loosing anything by pursuing the UNSC seat. No harm in trying :cheesy:

thumb_Haters_Gonna_Hate.jpg
 
I don't think China takes offense at Indian attempts at becoming a permanent member of the UNSC. We merely follow the development with a fair amout of amusement. Take Japan for example. Bear in mind that Japan started its campaign about twenty years ago when it was already the second largest economy and the second biggest contributor to the UN. US made all the right noises as well. What happened to Japan twenty years later? It is still on the outside looking in. Presentday India is nowhere near what Japan was twenty years ago. Go figure.

I'm going to bookmark this post. :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom