What's new

In Pakistan, a master bomb technician fights a new kind of war

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
In Pakistan, a master bomb technician fights a new kind of war

By Tim Craig July 19

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — In a country awash in bombs, Shafqat Malik races against time.

He has discovered some of the world’s biggest bombs — 8,000-pound bundles of explosives hidden in trucks — and some of the tiniest, slipped into Coke cans. He has defused bombs secreted in computers and television sets and disabled a suicide vest before its wearer could blow himself up.

Malik is one of Pakistan’s top explosives experts and head of the police bomb disposal unit in one of the country’s most conflictive provinces — Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, in the country’s northwest near the Afghan border. Malik’s job offers a window into a country suffering not just from Islamic extremism but a broader breakdown in order, with bombs planted by extortionists, people feuding over money and property, and assassins targeting religious minorities.

The problem has grown so severe that Malik and his 440-member team even examine bodies before funerals to make sure they have not been booby-trapped by terrorists or personal enemies.

Many analysts say the increasingly pervasive culture of bombings can be traced to the 1980s, when Pakistan hosted hundreds of thousands of Islamic fighters battling the Soviet army in Afghanistan. Pakistan worked with the United States and other countries to make sure the guerrillas were trained to use land mines and plastic explosives, said Saad Muhammad, a retired Pakistani army brigadier.

In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, Islamist extremists began shifting their fight toward Pakistan. They were aided by the remnants of al-Qaeda, which had chemists and engineers capable of making bombs, Muhammad said.

“We should have realized when we embarked on the jihad in Afghanistan, that this was a very dangerous game we were playing,” said Muhammad, who served as Pakistan’s military attache in Afghanistan from 2003 to 2005. “At the time, nobody gave a thought to the endgame.”

As the violence increased in the mid-2000s, Malik was thrust onto the front lines of a new kind of war.
He had become a highly specialized ammunition and explosives expert during a two-decade career in the Pakistani army, a time of considerable tension between Pakistan and long-standing rival India. In 2006, he retired from the military and went to work as a counterterrorism investigator for the Federal Investigation Agency. It was the start of a tumultuous new chapter for him, involving some of Pakistan’s grisliest tragedies.

and the 2008 bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, which killed 53 people.

In the early days, he said, suicide bombers “didn’t know what they were doing” and would just sit on a suitcase packed with explosives and hope it detonated.

But terrorists gradually became more sophisticated, transitioning from wearing bulky vests packed with explosives to sleeker belts and using remote-control triggers that made it harder for suicide bombers to abort their mission, he said.

By 2008, provincial officials were overwhelmed by the bombings, especially in the northwestern part of the country. Four bomb technicians from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa were killed when their vehicle struck an improvised explosive device, or IED.

Shortly after that attack, Malik received a call from a senior provincial official.

“He said, ‘Malik, please save us. We are dying,’ ” the bomb expert recalled.

Since taking charge in January 2009, Malik has increased the number of bomb technicians in the Peshawar-based unit from about 35 to 440. He also has sought donations of robots, sniffer dogs and armored vehicles from the United States and governments in Europe.

Over five years, his squad has encountered more than 5,500 devices, Malik said. But bombs are still found in Peshawar just about every day.

Malik describes bombs as a modern-day form of mugging in Peshawar, with extortionists and robbers increasingly using them.

Ajai Sahni, executive director of the New Delhi-based Institute for Conflict Management, said the explosives represent a “weaponization of society” in Pakistan, enabled by political leaders who waited too long to crack down on their favored militant groups.

“Either you neutralize everyone doing this kind of thing or you can’t control anyone,” Sahni said.

The victims include civilians such as Jamshed Baghwan, a journalist in Peshawar. He said in an interview that two men on motorcycles threw a white bag filled with 15 pounds of explosives at his garage this month, setting off a blast thatheavily damaged his car. It was the third time this year his residence had been hit with explosives.

“I have no idea why this is happening,” said Baghwan, the Peshawar bureau chief for Pakistan’s Express News Live television station. “I am just a local journalist. I am not someone famous, and I don’t have much money.”

A dangerous living
The provincial bomb technicians earn just $230 a month, including a paltry 50 cents or so a month in hazard pay, and complain that they still lack equipment. But many say they are proud to work for Malik.
“If Mr. Malik didn’t join the bomb disposal unit, there would be no bomb disposal unit at all,” said Wasal Khan, who has defused more than 150 IEDs over the past five years.

Ijaz Khan, Peshawar police chief, said Malik has a reputation for being fearless and thorough.

In January, police responded to an explosion at a mosque that killed 11 people. They initially thought it was caused by a gas leak.

“But Malik walked in and told us, ‘This was caused by a five-kilogram explosion’ ” and suggested there might be more bombs in the mosque, Ijaz Khan said. “We then found two others, and he defused them right in front of me.”

Malik is so confident of his skills that, in 2012, he disabled the suicide vest of a teenager, saving his life, as TV news crews followed his work live. The boy had been blocked from reaching his intended target, and police were preparing to shoot him, fearing he or someone using a remote trigger might detonate the vest.

“He was lying there, begging, ‘Don’t kill me,’ ” Malik recalls. “I said, ‘Don’t worry. . . . This is my scene, and God was very kind to have given me the chance to defuse you.”

Malik has had so many threats on his life that he keeps a file of the letters in his desk drawer.
The most serious attempt against him occurred in 2010, when he was investigating an attack on a police vehicle in Peshawar, he said.

As he surveyed the crime scene, he noticed a young woman in a black burqa moving toward him. As she approached, a small explosion tore off her left shoulder, killing her.

When Malik rushed over to the woman’s body, he noticed she was wearing a vest loaded with explosives. Some had apparently gone off, he said.

Malik bent down and, his hands covered with blood, began dismantling what remained of the device. He tried to avoid looking at the woman’s intact face.

“You are imagining the fate of your life if she had succeeded,” Malik said.

Aimar Iqbal contributed to this report.

Tim Craig is The Post’s bureau chief in Pakistan. He has also covered conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and within the District of Columbia government.
 
''Malik describes bombs as a modern-day form of mugging in Peshawar, with extortionists and robbers increasingly using them.''

So this is no longer tool of just terrorists but any crimnal.
 
The need of the hour is a thorough de-weaponization of Pakistan. We can't go on like this.
 
The need of the hour is a thorough de-weaponization of Pakistan. We can't go on like this.

You can not buy explosives at a weapons store. De-weaponization means to remove legal weapons out of the society. Legal weapons are not used in criminal and terrorist activities in Pakistan. Hell, we have a lower % of legal weapons taking lives than most western countries.
 
You can not buy explosives at a weapons store. De-weaponization means to remove legal weapons out of the society. Legal weapons are not used in criminal and terrorist activities in Pakistan. Hell, we have a lower % of legal weapons taking lives than most western countries.

De-weaponization in the sense which I meant to use it was not limited to removing 'legal' weapons from the society but to also regulate the production and distribution of bomb-making materials such as urea and potassium, in addition to closing down illegal gun markets in FATA and KPK. De-weaponization is meant to dispossess the society of any means or ability to produce, acquire, keep, hold or use any form of offensive weaponry or device.
 
De-weaponization in the sense which I meant to use it was not limited to removing 'legal' weapons from the society but to also regulate the production and distribution of bomb-making materials such as urea and potassium, in addition to closing down illegal gun markets in FATA and KPK. De-weaponization is meant to dispossess the society of any means or ability to produce, acquire, keep, hold or use any form of offensive weaponry or device.

Those weapons are not meant to exist in the first place. They will continue to exist till you spend developed country money on law and order infrastructure. So when we get money we can talk about where to spend it. De-weaponize Pakistan means that you ask the weapons you know about to stop existing.
 
Those weapons are not meant to exist in the first place. They will continue to exist till you spend developed country money on law and order infrastructure. So when we get money we can talk about where to spend it. De-weaponize Pakistan means that you ask the weapons you know about to stop existing.

Why the pessimism? We don't need foreign aid to regulate the distribution of bomb-making materials in the country. We don't need foreign aid to shut Barra down. We don't need money to put an end to Zia's gun-culture rule for the Pakhtuns. We simply need policy and enforcement. De-weaponize Pakistan does not only entail the removal of registered weapons. That would be an exercise of futility. I shall refer you to my earlier post on this.

I can understand that you have a registered firearm and would like to hold onto it. Keep it but don't undermine the importance of eradicating illegal firearms and explosives from the society.
 
Why the pessimism? We don't need foreign aid to regulate the distribution of bomb-making materials in the country. We don't need foreign aid to shut Barra down. We don't need money to put an end to Zia's gun-culture rule for the Pakhtuns. We simply need policy and enforcement. De-weaponize Pakistan does not only entail the removal of registered weapons. That would be an exercise of futility. I shall refer you to my earlier post on this.

I can understand that you have a registered firearm and would like to hold onto it. Keep it but don't undermine the importance of eradicating illegal firearms and explosives from the society.

Again, I will refer to my earlier post. There is no such thing as illegal weapons. They do not exist. If they exist that means the system of stopping them is not working. No sane individual would say that illegal weapons bring any sort of betterment to a country. What you are suggesting is a statement which echos to me like the sky is blue. I am 100% with you in what you are saying. When you say de-weaponize in Pakistan or you hear someone saying that it means that they want to take away legal firearms because they know where they are. If they knew where illegal firearms were what do you think they would do? In an "optimistic" society they would have taken those away without us having this discussion.
 
Again, I will refer to my earlier post. There is no such thing as illegal weapons. They do not exist. If they exist that means the system of stopping them is not working. No sane individual would say that illegal weapons bring any sort of betterment to a country. What you are suggesting is a statement which echos to me like the sky is blue. I am 100% with you in what you are saying. When you say de-weaponize in Pakistan or you hear someone saying that it means that they want to take away legal firearms because they know where they are. If they knew where illegal firearms were what do you think they would do? In an "optimistic" society they would have taken those away without us having this discussion.

I suppose you would be correct in pointing out that 'illegal weapons' is probably not the most accurate of terms to use when alluding to the weapons which I am referring to. The legal term would be unlicensed firearms. Firearms, cannons and ammunition produced, sold or possessed in the absence of the requisite license would be classed as unlicensed firearms. Rest assured they exist and it is gospel-truth that the policing and adjudicatory system in place to regulate or curb their prevalence in Pakistani society is failing us. Nobody is talking about unlicensed firearms bettering our society. On the contrary, I am positing their eradication, which we're both in agreement on, while you happen to be gracing us with a discourse on semantics.
 
this country need massive disarming civilians operation now and yes now . its need of the day . when you back from any first world country to pakistan you notice at air port you are in gunistan . go to hell gun culture of pakistan . if i have power i used it to bring out every single gun singe bullet out from this nation .
 
I suppose you would be correct in pointing out that 'illegal weapons' is probably not the most accurate of terms to use when alluding to the weapons which I am referring to. The legal term would be unlicensed firearms. Firearms, cannons and ammunition produced, sold or possessed in the absence of the requisite license would be classed as unlicensed firearms. Rest assured they exist and it is gospel-truth that the policing and adjudicatory system in place to regulate or curb their prevalence in Pakistani society is failing us. Nobody is talking about unlicensed firearms bettering our society. On the contrary, I am positing their eradication, which we're both in agreement on, while you happen to be gracing us with a discourse on semantics.

It all lies in the fine print. We should be talking about why there are 30k police in Karachi while private security exceed 100k. The problem of weapons becomes null and void when you focus on the root of the problem rather than the effects of the problem.
 
usual tomfoolery aside...i have had the highest of respect for bomb squads...i did not know his name...but the bomb squad of peshawar, karachi, the other smaller towns..they all have my sincere respect.
 
Back
Top Bottom