Imran Khan live speech

[epebble]

Simple question: why does an intelligent man do something that has even an appearance of impropriety? It is hard to argue that he is hurting for money. Why does he not know the Golden Rule: Caesar's wife should be above suspicion?

 

[Bilal.]

I am sure the ECP will detail its reasoning in the detailed verdict.

They do have a knack for adding additional clauses after gathering reactions from law community like they did last time.

That’s why even after months of having reached the saved verdict they didn’t release the detailed ruling.

 

[VCheng]

They do have a knack for adding additional clauses after gathering reactions from law community like they did last time.

That’s why even after months of having reached the saved verdict they didn’t release the detailed ruling.

But it has to come out at some point.

 

[Bilal.]

But it has to come out at some point.

Last time they added clauses. The point is not whether it will come but is it being amended retrospectively.

 

[VCheng]

Last time they added clauses. The point is not whether it will come but is it being amended retrospectively.

As long as any amendments are made by competent authority by due and valid process.

 

[Bilal.]

As long as any amendments are made by competent authority by due and valid process.

No, it’s not allowed to amend the ruling retrospectively.

 

[VCheng]

No, it’s not allowed to amend the ruling retrospectively.

Then any such amendments are not valid, plain and simple, if that is indeed true.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

IK is a lion, in a nation of jackals.

Hijra = Neutral , not Jackles , even Jackles fight to protect their kind

Jackle looks after it's kind

 

[Bilal.]

Then any such amendments are not valid, plain and simple, if that is indeed true.

They didn’t release the detailed judgement so the amends can be made behind closed doors if you know what I mean.

 

[VCheng]

They didn’t release the detailed judgement so the amends can be made behind closed doors if you know what I mean.

That is only speculative, so cannot say anything about it.

 

[Bilal.]

That is only speculative, so cannot say anything about it.

Sure. I am not asking you to believe it.

 

[villageidiot]

Simple question: why does an intelligent man do something that has even an appearance of impropriety? It is hard to argue that he is hurting for money. Why does he not know the Golden Rule: Caesar's wife should be above suspicion?

The guy paid 50% where his precessors were paying 10 or 20% for retaining gifts, and also retained some without paying at all, iirc. Nawaz and zardari even retained bulletproof vehicles whereas retaining vehicles is not allowed. Gilani (in)famously stole the Turkish first lady's necklace. I guess with such upright characters to look upto, IK must have thought he could get away with a watch or two. Silly him.

 

[VCheng]

The guy paid 50% where his precessors were paying 10 or 20% for retaining gifts, and also retained some without paying at all, iirc. Nawaz and zardari even retained bulletproof vehicles whereas retaining vehicles is not allowed. Gilani (in)famously stole the Turkish first lady's necklace. I guess with such upright characters to look upto, IK must have thought he could get away with a watch or two. Silly him.

But were any gifts removed without the proper declaration? That is the question.

 

[Solidify]

I am ready to Donate Money to PTI for getting rid of this filth regime change ghaddars

 

[epebble]

The guy paid 50% where his precessors were paying 10 or 20% for retaining gifts, and also retained some without paying at all, iirc. Nawaz and zardari even retained bulletproof vehicles whereas retaining vehicles is not allowed. Gilani (in)famously stole the Turkish first lady's necklace. I guess with such upright characters to look upto, IK must have thought he could get away with a watch or two.

Pretty low bar for a guy who calls his party "Movement for Justice"

Silly him.

Best Faint Praise one can come up with.