What's new

If Pakistan fires, we won't keep an account of our bullets: Rajnath Singh

and isnt it amazing that it still continues with full pace. neither Pakistan nor China is backing off. CPEC is important for both countries and both acknowledge that. The huge investment by China is a testimony to this fact.

China is stuck. It passing through P0K is the reason why there no other financing players are involved in CPEC. China too knows the huge risks it is taking. But I can assure you that CPEC will not be as easy as many Pakistanis believe it too be. It is fraught with huge risks, that may increase its costs and may even render it unfeasible.
 
.
China is stuck. It passing through P0K is the reason why there no other financing players are involved in CPEC. China too knows the huge risks it is taking. But I can assure you that CPEC will not be as easy as many Pakistanis believe it too be. It is fraught with huge risks, that may increase its costs and may even render it unfeasible.
I dont know how things work in India, but a little bit of common sense, China wouldnt invest 40+ billion $ in a project for it to be stuck, China would back off. These things are sorted out during preliminary stages of feasibility, not in the middle or in final stages after commencement of project.
 
. .
Silly and useless reporting...I think PDF members should understand that these kind of talk from both the nations is just for consumption of few cheer leaders of both the countries..Just ignore it...India should not engage in any useless war with any one...If also, you are perceived as underdog, still then India should buy its time to strengthen itself economically and socially in these days than going to war with any one..
 
.
Well, to be honest, after the last year's "don't count bullets" policy of India, the border has been relatively quiet.
I am not reading about the weekly misadventures from our neighbours, which used to be a norm two years before.

Now, they know the only thing they can do is covert...

Ironic.. Border had been quiet since a decade specially after Musharaf announced ceasefire.. It emgit tense only after modi came to power.. And after all the hullabaloo about beheadings n other nonsense and loss of life on both sides it died down.. I guess indian govt wasn't getting much mileage after a the tamasha..

Meanwhile independence movement in IOK is again gaining strength..

I am sorry but why would you think India WOULD NOT try and stifle it?:-)

We will do darn best to reciprocate what the other side is doing to us.
I am a firm believer in golden rule.
And how do you plan on doing that? Begging Xi in Beijing ? That surely didn't work!

Infact the Chinese aren't just sending troops in south Tibet but also flying jets over it..
 
.
I dont know how things work in India, but a little bit of common sense, China wouldnt invest 40+ billion $ in a project for it to be stuck, China would back off. These things are sorted out during preliminary stages of feasibility, not in the middle or in final stages after commencement of project.

China has a compulsion to develop its wild west and there is also the factor of bogging down India in this region. Moreover, China may have come to the conclusion that the present ground situation is final in Kashmir and there won't be any territorial changes. Whatever may be the mitigating reason China has, there are also aggravating reason why CPEC might fail.
 
.
Meanwhile independence movement in IOK is again gaining strength..

It has been gaining strength for the past 65+ years.
Wonder when it will stop gaining strength and actually show the strength.

Heh...keep showing us this "strength". We have more people and money and will gladly use both.
At the end of the day you will run out of people or money or even both.

And how do you plan on doing that? Begging Xi in Beijing ? That surely didn't work!

Infact the Chinese aren't just sending troops in south Tibet but also flying jets over it..

Sir, respectfully, there is only country that stands with a bowl in front of China and that is not India.

Tibet is not a issue to us. Really does not make much difference if Tibet is with China or independent.

We will do what we have to do. Not everything needs to said out in the open. The intelligent people can understand, the other's will never understand. ;)
 
.
It has been gaining strength for the past 65+ years.
Wonder when it will stop gaining strength and actually show the strength.
Facts aren't in your side boy.

Heh...keep showing us this "strength". We have more people and money and will gladly use both.
At the end of the day you will run out of people or money or even both.

Funny .. Do you plan on exterminating Kashmirisnow? You've been running the campaign since too long... And gained nothing ;



http://www.deccanchronicle.com/nati...rupting-anti-militancy-operations-in-j-k.html



http://m.greaterkashmir.com/news/kashmir/thousands-attend-militant-s-funeral-in-pulwama/214053.html

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...lain-militant-dawood-sheikh-in-south-kashmir/

http://www.efe.com/efe/english/life...n-kashmir-for-slain-militant/50000263-2832682

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...erals-Worrisome/2016/03/12/article3322579.ece

http://m.ndtv.com/india-news/army-i...ing-during-operations-rise-in-kashmir-1285956

http://kashmirdispatch.com/2016/02/...lly-but-military-occupation-continues/140847/
 
.
.
Sir, respectfully, there is only country that stands with a bowl in front of China and that is not India.


Sir respectfully there is only one country that's called the world biggest beggar ...

And respectfully there is no AID but investment involved in CPEC..


Tibet is not a issue to us. Really does not make much difference if Tibet is with China or independent.

Your too stupid to understand that China claims Aranachul Pradesh as Southern Tibet..

We will do what we have to do. Not everything needs to said out in the open. The intelligent people can understand, the other's will never understand. ;)
Starts and ends at moaning..

Sir, I have said what I have to say on this.

regarding your statement of extermination of kshmiri's, No, we love Kashmiri Pandits and will do everything necessary, no, we will do it no matter what they are resettled in the valley ;)

Sir, you should better keep shut if you can't argue with facts and can only come up with nonsense.. Respectfully sir.
 
.
China has a compulsion to develop its wild west and there is also the factor of bogging down India in this region. Moreover, China may have come to the conclusion that the present ground situation is final in Kashmir and there won't be any territorial changes. Whatever may be the mitigating reason China has, there are also aggravating reason why CPEC might fail.

China downplays the reports of concern , as stated by Chinese Foreign Minister in this article. I am sure the Chinese Foreign Minister, Hong Lei, can satisfy your concerns

http://www.newindianexpress.com/wor...Kashmir-Stretch/2016/01/12/article3224499.ece

BEIJING: China on Tuesday downplayed reports about its reservations over the Azad Kashmir stretch of the USD 46 billion economic corridor it has planned with Pakistan, saying the project would not affect the positions held by the parties to the Kashmir dispute.

"The ownership of the Kashmir region is an issue between India and Pakistan left over from history and should be resolved through dialogues and consultations between the two sides," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hong Lei told a media briefing here.

He made the remarks in reply to a question on reports that China is concerned over the "disputed status" of Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir) through which the about 3,000 km-long China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is proposed to pass.

The project plans to connect China's Xinjiang with Pakistan's Gwadar port on the Arabian Sea.

"Relevant cooperation between China and Pakistan in the region aims to promote local economic and social development.

It does not target any third party nor affect the positions held by different parties on the relevant dispute," Hong said.

Recent reports in Pakistan said following China's concerns, Islamabad is weighing options to elevate the constitutional status of northern Gilgit-Baltistan region of the Azad Kashmir to provide legal cover to the mega corridor plan, marking a historic shift in stand to keep it out of its Constitutional ambit.

Gilgit-Baltistan has never been formally integrated into the Pakistani state and does not participate in Pakistan's Constitutional political affairs.

Hong did not directly respond to the question on China's concerns over the disputed region but Pakistani media reports quoted an official as saying that Beijing was apprehensive about future legal complications.

"China cannot afford to invest billions of dollars on a road that passes through a disputed territory claimed both by India and Pakistan," the official was quoted as saying.

Outwardly, China has been maintaining that this project will not have any impact on the Azad Kashmir's "disputed status" but the efforts by the Pakistani government to look for options to change the status of Gilgit-Baltistan has come as a surprise to observers here.

India has been protesting the corridor's passing through Azad Kashmir to China ever since the project was kicked off by President Xi Jinping during his visit to Islamabad last year.

Hong also responded to questions over the brewing discontentment in some of the Pakistani regions and discord among the political parties over the benefits of the project being harnessed by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's Punjab province.

Replying to a question about scepticism prevailing among many Pakistanis over the project, Hong said the corridor is an important consensus reached by leaders of the two countries.

"It will cover the entire state of Pakistan and deliver benefits to the entire population of Pakistan. It will also promote the common prosperity and development of not only China and Pakistan but a also other countries in the region," he said.

Hong also said the project construction will take a long time and will be built in a step by step manner.

"The building of the economic corridor is a systematic work that will take a long time," he said adding that it will constructed in a step by step manner following "scientific planning".

"We would like to make joint efforts with Pakistan to implement the project, make long term plan and push for new progress in the building of the economic corridor," he said.

Reports in the Pakistani media have also quoted Chinese Embassy in Islamabad as saying that, "China hopes that the relevant parties in Pakistan could strengthen communication and coordination on the CPEC to create favourable conditions for the project."
 
.
China has a compulsion to develop its wild west and there is also the factor of bogging down India in this region. Moreover, China may have come to the conclusion that the present ground situation is final in Kashmir and there won't be any territorial changes. Whatever may be the mitigating reason China has, there are also aggravating reason why CPEC might fail.

Lets keep people poor and backwards so they become terrorist...then we can chant all over media about Pakistan producing terrorist...Anything which fails Indian plans and prediction sets their behind on fire.
 
.
Sir respectfully there is only one country that's called the world biggest beggar ...

And respectfully there is no AID but investment involved in CPEC..




Your too stupid to understand that China claims Aranachul Pradesh as Southern Tibet..


Starts and ends at moaning..



Sir, you should better keep shut if you can't argue with facts and can only come up with nonsense.. Respectfully sir.

Sir, we Indians couldn't care less if Chinese dress up a Pig and call it Pokémon.
As far as we are concerned Arunachal Pradesh is what it is and not what Chinese claim.

And to add, If you are looking to shoot from Chinese shoulders, consider this.
China claims Arunachal Pradesh but it is India which has been governing this area for decades. What does that tell you?
Similarly it is with Kashmir.

Both China and Pakistan will keep claiming. Chinese are smart enough to know the fact that they are never getting Arunachal Pradesh but the other one is not ;)
 
Last edited:
.
China downplays the reports of concern , as stated by Chinese Foreign Minister in this article. I am sure the Chinese Foreign Minister, Hong Lei, can satisfy your concerns

http://www.newindianexpress.com/wor...ECs-***-Stretch/2016/01/12/article3224499.ece

BEIJING: China on Tuesday downplayed reports about its reservations over the *** stretch of the USD 46 billion economic corridor it has planned with Pakistan, saying the project would not affect the positions held by the parties to the Kashmir dispute.

"The ownership of the Kashmir region is an issue between India and Pakistan left over from history and should be resolved through dialogues and consultations between the two sides," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hong Lei told a media briefing here.

He made the remarks in reply to a question on reports that China is concerned over the "disputed status" of Azad Kashmir (***) through which the about 3,000 km-long China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is proposed to pass.

The project plans to connect China's Xinjiang with Pakistan's Gwadar port on the Arabian Sea.

"Relevant cooperation between China and Pakistan in the region aims to promote local economic and social development.

It does not target any third party nor affect the positions held by different parties on the relevant dispute," Hong said.

Recent reports in Pakistan said following China's concerns, Islamabad is weighing options to elevate the constitutional status of northern Gilgit-Baltistan region of the *** to provide legal cover to the mega corridor plan, marking a historic shift in stand to keep it out of its Constitutional ambit.

Gilgit-Baltistan has never been formally integrated into the Pakistani state and does not participate in Pakistan's Constitutional political affairs.

Hong did not directly respond to the question on China's concerns over the disputed region but Pakistani media reports quoted an official as saying that Beijing was apprehensive about future legal complications.

"China cannot afford to invest billions of dollars on a road that passes through a disputed territory claimed both by India and Pakistan," the official was quoted as saying.

Outwardly, China has been maintaining that this project will not have any impact on the ***'s "disputed status" but the efforts by the Pakistani government to look for options to change the status of Gilgit-Baltistan has come as a surprise to observers here.

India has been protesting the corridor's passing through *** to China ever since the project was kicked off by President Xi Jinping during his visit to Islamabad last year.

Hong also responded to questions over the brewing discontentment in some of the Pakistani regions and discord among the political parties over the benefits of the project being harnessed by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's Punjab province.

Replying to a question about scepticism prevailing among many Pakistanis over the project, Hong said the corridor is an important consensus reached by leaders of the two countries.

"It will cover the entire state of Pakistan and deliver benefits to the entire population of Pakistan. It will also promote the common prosperity and development of not only China and Pakistan but a also other countries in the region," he said.

Hong also said the project construction will take a long time and will be built in a step by step manner.

"The building of the economic corridor is a systematic work that will take a long time," he said adding that it will constructed in a step by step manner following "scientific planning".

"We would like to make joint efforts with Pakistan to implement the project, make long term plan and push for new progress in the building of the economic corridor," he said.

Reports in the Pakistani media have also quoted Chinese Embassy in Islamabad as saying that, "China hopes that the relevant parties in Pakistan could strengthen communication and coordination on the CPEC to create favourable conditions for the project."

It is not the Chinese to say about P0K, China is not the party to the dispute.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom