What's new

If Bangladesh can become independent in 1971 then why not Kashmir?

Q: If Bangladesh can become Independent in 1971 then why not Kashmir ?
A. Coz India is not Pakistan.

Exactly....If at any point of time, Kashmir would like to get a freedom, they can not simply get it by fighting with Indian nationhood. They have to allign with India's interest and then only there is a possibility of any freedom or separation...Otherwise, trust me, Kashmir are just unfortunately wasting their generation where rest of the India is progressing for their own development and destiny.
 
.
india doctrine.png


Very heated discussion going on this very dangerous post on facebook.

On topic: Kashmir is absolutely nothing like Bangladesh....we have very different history and geography....Bangladesh was one of the key fighters for two nation theory...so India would not annex it in its wildest dream (to have it break apart again at a more violent cost)...Kashmir is in literally in the middle of India and Pakistan...both parties can exert equal military force in that land...Pakistan could not exercise a force anywhere near what India could in 71....and Kashmir is politically divided....it has significant support for joining Pakistan...support of joining India and support for Independence at the same time...Bangladesh didn't have that problem....most of us wanted Independence and we got it.
 
.
@MBI Munshi

Your glorification of this Wani b!tc# literally brought tears in my eyes...I bet you've written similar reports on Bangladeshi terrorists as well,which might have got a place in Jammati Newspapers.Now hard cold fact..

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...iger-or-Indian-agent/articleshow/53163220.cms

don't sneeze by saying that it came from TOI..

TOI = RAW. By the way I did not write that comment I just posted it here so don't get your panties in a twist.

View attachment 316997

Very heated discussion going on this very dangerous post on facebook.

On topic: Kashmir is absolutely nothing like Bangladesh....we have very different history and geography....Bangladesh was one of the key fighters for two nation theory...so India would not annex it in its wildest dream (to have it break apart again at a more violent cost)...Kashmir is in literally in the middle of India and Pakistan...both parties can exert equal military force in that land...Pakistan could not exercise a force anywhere near what India could in 71....and Kashmir is politically divided....it has significant support for joining Pakistan...support of joining India and support for Independence at the same time...Bangladesh didn't have that problem....most of us wanted Independence and we got it.

It is still early here and the original post has many more shares.
 
. .
TOI = RAW. By the way I did not write that comment I just posted it here so don't get your panties in a twist.



It is still early here and the original post has many more shares.
So who is the AKM Wahidujjaman? And where did he make the original post?
 
.
Here the question is that if Muslims become majority in any part of India, they will push Hindus out and than demand separate state. If this is the course of action , what is the justification of Muslims living in Hindu majority area?
 
. . . .
It is good to know that some parts in Kashmir are peaceful. I think you are referring to the areas where there is a majority of Hindus.
NOPE. most of the tourist places are Muslim majority only and they are peaceful. the problem is with Srinagar and south kashmir.
 
.
It is possible for this to happen and I am worried as an Indian but let me tell u that if it happens entire subcontinent will burn and there many nukes floating here. The 2 eras are different.


if this happens one scenario could be ramifications on Indian Muslims . Then Pakistan will try to fish again to break up India. Then we will look at a nuclear war if India has nothing to lose. Do not wish for it.


No sir Pak only wants the land. There are equal number of disgruntled Kashmiris in P0k but muzzled and also by playing Islam card.
No; Pakistan doesnt want land - it wants to see Kashmir free. For many Pakistanis this is a personal issue - since a quarter of Punjab's population is Kashmiri and a massive segment of our elite/military/government (including Nawaz Sharif) are Kashmiris.

When you hear news of your kinsmen being killed in the streets, rape incidents, harassment and overall oppression; it turns into a personal issue.

We'll let the Kashmiris decide what they want to do.
 
.
৭১এর মুক্তিযোদ্ধারা স্বাধীনতাকামী হলে কাশ্মীরীরা নয় কেন?

একেএম ওয়াহিদুজ্জামান

বুরহান মুজাফ্ফর ওয়ানী। এই ২২ বছরের তরুনটি স্বাধীন ছিল, স্বাধীন অবস্থাতেই মাতৃভূমির স্বাধীনতার জন্য জীবন দিয়ে গেল। মাত্র ২২ বছরের একটি জীবন দেখিয়ে গেল কিভাবে তার দেখানো পথে আরো ৩০ জন স্বাধীনতার জন্য জীবন দিতে পারে। আর আমরা ধীরে ধীরে স্বাধীন থেকে পরাধীন হচ্ছি সেই শক্তির অধীনেই, যার বিরুদ্ধে বুরহানরা জীবন দিয়ে যাচ্ছে। আফসোস! আসলেই স্বাধীননতা অর্জনের চেয়ে রক্ষা করা কঠিন।

https://www.facebook.com/TheIndiaDoctrine/

13645154_1231478116865399_2854034950149241746_n.jpg
How about you worry about your own country and let us worry about ours??
 
. .
No; Pakistan doesnt want land - it wants to see Kashmir free. For many Pakistanis this is a personal issue - since a quarter of Punjab's population is Kashmiri and a massive segment of our elite/military/government (including Nawaz Sharif) are Kashmiris.

When you hear news of your kinsmen being killed in the streets, rape incidents, harassment and overall oppression; it turns into a personal issue.

We'll let the Kashmiris decide what they want to do.
KINSMEN huh?? Well after all it was your countrymen in East Pakistan.. remember how that turned out?
 
.
Munshi bhai...... If i go by your post here, You doesnt seem to be happy in Bangladesh......So what is the point of being independent???

Is it ok if i post a thread based on a malayalam text???? You should be knowing the rules better than normal guys...
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom