Penguin
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 56
Main differences:
at 0-deck, whole above deck structure appears farther back
smaller main gun (no penetration of 0-deck > more below 0-deck free space forward)
single rather than pair of Mk41 sized VLS (length lost: 2.6m?)
smaller deck area between superstructure and VLS (length lost: another 4.4m?)
no GTUs hence simpler single stack arrangement
at 0-deck, whole above deck structure appears farther back
smaller main gun (no penetration of 0-deck > more below 0-deck free space forward)
single rather than pair of Mk41 sized VLS (length lost: 2.6m?)
smaller deck area between superstructure and VLS (length lost: another 4.4m?)
no GTUs hence simpler single stack arrangement
No. The Incheons Batch 1 cost $232 million a pop.Do you reckon the $168m per ship price tag is all inclusive (of the hull, propulsion and onboard electronics and weapons)?