What's new

Huawei Australia says ban is a ‘slap in the face’ to China

I built a port??? And with no economuc value.
Do some research before you make silly comment. In fact this is a private project involving Hong Kong businessmen and the Sri Lanka government.
China EXIM bank was the only link to China involvement and why not? A bank main function is to lend money.
The port was build over a swamp land that is partially covered by the sea, dude.
That is why when the opposition leader who won the election wanted to hand this project to India. One look at the land and the project they ran away.
There was no taker. None except for the Hong Kong group.
So stop yoir silly blame that sounds more like propaganda from India.

Port that is empty has no economic value. It is away from the largest city which happens to have a busy port
 
Which 20 countries in Europe ?
France, Germany, Norway, Italy, Monaco, Spain, Switzerland, Ireland, Portugal, the Netherlands, Finland, Greece, Cyprus, Austria, Romania, Hungary, Turkey, Sweden, Russia and Serbia
 
I am only dictating to all a chronology of events on what I have been following based on my memory and what was reported in the news. I am not an interested party in here.
I just hate fake news and propaganda.
I enjoyed setting the record and character straight
And you, you pretend you have no recollection? Come on.
Who are you fooling? :coffee: :no:

HAHAHA!!!! In other words you got caught lying about Apple and you are trying to dance around it. You couldn't find one article backing up your assertion. No surprise.
 
Last edited:
HAHAHA!!!! In other words you got caught lying about Apple and you are trying to dance around it. You couldn't find one article backing up your assertion. No surprise.
You mean I lied like you lied all the time.
What an insult coming from a habitual troll like you.
Not everybody is like you, one who lacks integrity and honesty to begin with.
Although it will be difficult to find the same article again after sometimes as they have been removed due to various reasons, God and NSA only knows.
But fortunately news below like this one will offered a clue to what happened?
https://qz-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/qz.com/332059/apple-is-reportedly-giving-the-chinese-government-access-to-its-devices-for-a-security-assessment/amp/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=16000381146167&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fqz.com%2F332059%2Fapple-is-reportedly-giving-the-chinese-government-access-to-its-devices-for-a-security-assessment%2F

Ever wonder why did Apple out of the blue offered its source code to Chinese Government voluntarily if they were not caught red handed?
Apple has no reasons to jeopardize its huge China market then but NSA of USA does. It is illegal and unconstitutional and so is the FISA court of USA.
These spying chip and software are still present inside iPhone outside of China.
 
Port that is empty has no economic value. It is away from the largest city which happens to have a busy port
You sure you know what you are writing.
A lot of new infrastructures are being built around the port by others.
Anyway the port being leased to these businessmen is of no concern to Sri Lanka Government today. Whether it will be profitable or not. So stop harping on it.
 
You mean I lied like you lied all the time.
What an insult coming from a habitual troll like you.
Not everybody is like you, one who lacks integrity and honesty to begin with.
Although it will be difficult to find the same article again after sometimes as they have been removed due to various reasons, God and NSA only knows.
But fortunately news below like this one will offered a clue to what happened?
https://qz-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/qz.com/332059/apple-is-reportedly-giving-the-chinese-government-access-to-its-devices-for-a-security-assessment/amp/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=16000381146167&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fqz.com%2F332059%2Fapple-is-reportedly-giving-the-chinese-government-access-to-its-devices-for-a-security-assessment%2F

Ever wonder why did Apple out of the blue offered its source code to Chinese Government voluntarily if they were not caught red handed?
Apple has no reasons to jeopardize its huge China market then but NSA of USA does. It is illegal and unconstitutional and so is the FISA court of USA.
These spying chip and software are still present inside iPhone outside of China.

Just keep up making up lies out of thin air about things Apple and then dancing around with weak excuses when caught. We all know now your words are worthless...which is not a big surprise as you follow a standard lack of integrity pattern. Your tangent yapping and whataboutism isn't making it any better.
 
Last edited:
Just keep up making up lies out of thin air about things Apple and then dancing around with weak excuses when caught. We all know now your words are worthless...which is not a big surprise as you follow a standard pattern. Your tangent yapping isn't making it any better.
:coffee: :cheers:
You still have a long way to go in term of learning.
Start by accepting the truth.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

I assured you this stealth program is still alive. That is why USA pointed its finger at China to allay its malfeasance.
How would I Know?

I don't need to.
US whistle-blower Edward Snowden has already revealed it all in his book including the program PRISM.

:sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic:
 
You sure you know what you are writing.
A lot of new infrastructures are being built around the port by others.
Anyway the port being leased to these businessmen is of no concern to Sri Lanka Government today. Whether it will be profitable or not. So stop harping on it.

so you say comrade.
at the end of the day sri lankans had to hand over the port to foreigners for a 99 year lease
 
so you say comrade.
at the end of the day sri lankans had to hand over the port to foreigners for a 99 year lease
So what do you think will happens if you continue to default in servicing your loan or failed to make your monthly mortgage payment to a bank says in Australia or USA?
I will tell you what will happened.
The bank will either forfeit your collateral or do a foreclosure on your property.
Sri Lanka did legally signed the loan agreement with EXIM bank.
Even if it is other non Chinese bank, the end result will be the same.
Why single out China? It is just a commercial deal.
In this case, China and Sri Lanka agreed to a settlement and China leased the port for 99 years. So what is your problem.
What is your interest and why are you politicising it?
Just to badmouth China like USA?
 
Last edited:
So when do you think will happens if you continue to default in servicing your loan or failed to make your monthly mortgage payment to a bank says in Australia or USA?
I will tell you what will happened.
The bank will either forfeit your collateral or do a foreclosure on your property.
Sri Lanka did legally signed the loan agreement with EXIM bank.
Even if it is other non Chinese bank, the end result will be the same.
Why single out China? It is just a commercial deal.
In this case, China and Sri Lanka agreed to a settlement and China leased the port for 99 years. So what is your problem.
What is your interest and why are you politicising it?
Just to badmouth China like USA?

There is a difference between countries and people. Tell me when you understand it
 
There is a difference between countries and people. Tell me when you understand it
Really there is a difference? Yes. Maybe in mechanism. That is for explaining to simpletons like say you.

So in your opinion, any nations can go round borrowing as much as they want from any international banks and they can forget about having to pay these commercial loans back.
There will be absolutely no consequences for sovereign default.

But you still did not explain why Sri Lanka agreed to lease out the port in settlement if that is the case.
 
Really there is a difference? Yes. Maybe in mechanism. That is for explaining to simpletons like say you.

So in your opinion, any nations can go round borrowing as much as they want from any international banks and they can forget about having to pay these commercial loans back.
There will be absolutely no consequences for sovereign default.

But you still did not explain why Sri Lanka agreed to lease out the port in settlement if that is the case.

What you say is not true ? banks do not loan money to countries that are bad credit risks. banks do not loan money for uneconomical projects like Hambonta port. of course chinese banks do not follow those rules because the real objective was never the success of the port. it was more like a land grab
 
What you say is not true ? banks do not loan money to countries that are bad credit risks. banks do not loan money for uneconomical projects like Hambonta port. of course chinese banks do not follow those rules because the real objective was never the success of the port. it was more like a land grab
Land grab??? :sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
More of your political propaganda nonsense.
It is a legitimate deal recognized internationally.
China depends its own rating agencies which are less discriminatory.

That is why many sub prime nations including Sri Lanka has no choice but to depend on China for loans.
Sri Lanka has try very hard to apply for IMF loans without any success. That is before they turned to China.

So you see if you are listed as a sub prime borrower, you cannot complained just like Greece, Argentina, Zimbabwe,etc.
They have to learn to be grateful.

BTW USA is heading that direction.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom