What's new

How US and Blair plotted ‘ceasefire’ scam

RFS_Br

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
1,237
Reaction score
0
Country
Brazil
Location
Brazil
How US and Blair plotted ‘ceasefire’ scam | Jonathan Cook's Blog

We now have confirmation from the Israeli daily Haaretz of what we should have suspected: that the idea for the so-called Egyptian “ceasefire proposal” was actually hatched in Washington, the messenger boy was arch-war criminal Tony Blair, and the terms were drafted by Israel.

The intention was either to corner Hamas into surrendering – and thereby keep the savage blockade of Gaza in place – or force Hamas to reject the proposal and confirm the Israeli narrative that it is a terrorist organisation with which Israel cannot make peace.

According to Haaretz, Blair secretly initiated his “ceasefire” activity after “coordinating” with US Secretary of State John Kerry. On Saturday he headed off to Cairo to meet with the US-backed Egyptian dictator Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to persuade him to put his name to the proposal.

Immediately afterwards, he travelled to Israel to meet Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday afternoon. Sisi and Netanyahu were then supposed to thrash out the details. When they failed to do so, Blair intervened again on behalf of the Americans and the pair spoke by phone on Saturday evening.

Here’s the key paragraph from Haaretz:
Senior Israeli officials and Western diplomats said the reason the Egyptian cease-fire initiative was so short-lived is that it was prepared hastily and was not coordinated with all the relevant parties, particularly Hamas.

Wonderful that throw-away last line. In all this activity, it never occurred to the US, Blair, Sisi or Netanyahu – and no doubt Mahmoud Abbas, who is strangely absent from this account – that it might be necessary to sound out Hamas on the terms of a ceasefire it would need to abide by.

Now it seems Kerry is using US muscle to get Egypt, Qatar and Turkey to strong-arm Hamas into surrendering.

It’s depressingly predictable that the corporate media have swallowed the line of Israel accepting the “ceasefire proposal” and Hamas rejecting it. What Hamas did was reject a US-Israeli diktat to sign away the rights of the people of Gaza to end a siege that cuts them off from the rest of the world.

But there is a long pedigree to such deceptions. It is reminiscent of a hasbara favourite: that the Jews accepted the UN partition plan of 1947 while the Palestinians rejected it. The reality – then, as now – is that the colonial powers sought to strip the Palestinians of their rights and their homeland without even consulting them.
 
.
I was saying this from the beginning. It's disappointing to see the US administration indulge in this. It's not surprising that no nations or relevant parties are taking part in mediating besides the usual Israeli suspects and the war criminal Blair who should not be allowed to step foot in Egypt.

These actors clearly have an agenda in the works.

This is important for those who actually thought there was a ceasefire.

@Dillinger @others
 
.
Now , even anonymous blogs are being considered as gospel truth by gullibles, case of clutching to straws.
 
. . . . . .
Does the link of OP belongs to Haaretz ?? Bring me the link from Haaretz saying that terms were drafted by Israel.

Search the quoted strip, and who else would draft the terms? Egypt's current military leadership doesn't want something good for Gaza and I don't need to explain to you about Tony Blair.

If Turkey or Qatar get involved then this would change. This first attempt is purely Israeli based.

and thats ur opinion !

No, that's a fact. Haaretz is reliable, it may not suit your preference since it isn't right wing like you are. It's a liberal paper.
 
.
Search the quoted strip, and who else would draft the terms? Egypt's current military leadership doesn't want something good for Gaza and I don't need to explain to you about Tony Blair.

If Turkey or Qatar get involved then this would change. This first attempt is purely Israeli based.

I asked for the Haaretz's link not for your stories. There is no room for your personal opinion.
 
. . .
Can you use your brain and understand the difference between setting the terms and mere talking to the negotiating President ??

Are you child? Do I need to explain every single thing to you? The article states the 'cease-fire' was purely made up Israeli demands. Haaretz mentions that the Palestinian party was not consulted of the cease fire meaning there was no negotiations or demands from the Palestinian side addressed.

Which supports the claim in the article. Are you that stupid to understand? If so, get lost.
 
.
Are you child? Do I need to explain every single thing to you? The article states the 'cease-fire' was purely made up Israeli demands. Haaretz mentions that the Palestinian party was not consulted of the cease fire meaning there was no negotiations or demands from the Palestinian side addressed.

Which supports the claim in the article. Are you that stupid to understand? If so, get lost.

Stupid, it didn' say that he didn't talked to Hamas but zeal outs like you won't get that.

Meanwhile if even Egypt is not on your side then you are doomed.
 
.
Stupid, it didn' say that he didn't talked to Hamas but zeal outs like you won't get that.

Meanwhile if even Egypt is not on your side then you are doomed.

Senior Israeli officials and Western diplomats said the reason the Egyptian cease-fire initiative was so short-lived is that it was prepared hastily and was not coordinated with all the relevant parties, particularly Hamas.

...........

Try to read again genius.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom