What's new

How Poor Performance Record of M777 howitzers means of indian acquisition

bananarepublic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,424
Reaction score
5
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
What the poor performance of the American M777 Howitzer's and its Failure in the Indian Army Indicate Regarding India's Military Acquisition Strategy

In its effort to diversify its weapons sources, part of a trend in which India is becoming a fast growing customer for US arms, the county contracted 145 M777 howitzers from America's BAE systems. With two of the contracted artillery pieces having already been delivered, severe technical issues with the weapons have already been reported. During Indian field trials for the M777 Howitzer at the Army's Pokhran firing range in which the new weapons were tested, one of the two newly purchased M777s reportedly disintegrated causing a serious accident. This failure was acknowledged by the US producer BAE, but with these weapons having been set for deployment to the Chinese border their unreliability is likely to compromise India's capabilities.

According to leaked Indian army documents the underperformance of the M777 howitzers was entirely predictable, and the guns had failed to meet critical performance requirements during previous field evaluation trials. According to the Hindustan Times, the Indian army had reported the M777 "had fared poorly in direct firing and air portability trials." Severe shortcomings with the barrel life, minimum range, and anti-skid mechanism were also recorded. The reasons why the military proceeded with the purchases despite this can only be speculated, but they are likely linked to New Delhi's recent moves to strengthen defense ties with Washington - for which increased arms purchases would be a key facilitator of military cooperation. US artillery do have a remarkable history of barrel bursts and accidents, and as recently as August 12th 2017 two US soldiers were killed and five more injured when firing the M777 against Islamic State positions in Iraq. Similarly to the Indian case, the gun malfunctioned and the shell exploded. This was just the most recent of a history of many similar such incidents for the M777. Some examples include the three Australian soldiers injured March 2014 when an M777 malfunctioned. The month before a US soldier had been killed and two more were seriously injured during a live firing of the M777 at Fort Bragg - and three years before ten more personnel were injured in a similar incident with the same weapons system at the same place.

Should India continue to knowingly make costly purchases of flawed weapons systems, it could seriously undermine their military capabilities and leave their armed forces vulnerable to disaster in times of war. The fact that the purchases of the M777 went ahead despite the fact that the military was fully aware of its record for failures is a worrying indicator for the country's acquisition strategy indicating that factors other than a weapons system's performance - be it corruption or currying political favor with Washington. If the M777 is indicative of the acquisition strategies of Indian military as a whole, it could prove to be a highly compromised military force. If on the other hand a lesson can be learned regarding the dangerous consequences of purchasing weapons based on factors other than their capabilities and reliability, the failure of the M777 may well serve as a a wake up call for the Indian military and lead to better planned defense spending in future.

Shown below: BAE M777 Howitzer
 
FB_IMG_1505403692942.jpg
FB_IMG_1505403689304.jpg
FB_IMG_1505403685545.jpg
FB_IMG_1505403681624.jpg
 
What the poor performance of the American M777 Howitzer's and its Failure in the Indian Army Indicate Regarding India's Military Acquisition Strategy

In its effort to diversify its weapons sources, part of a trend in which India is becoming a fast growing customer for US arms, the county contracted 145 M777 howitzers from America's BAE systems. With two of the contracted artillery pieces having already been delivered, severe technical issues with the weapons have already been reported. During Indian field trials for the M777 Howitzer at the Army's Pokhran firing range in which the new weapons were tested, one of the two newly purchased M777s reportedly disintegrated causing a serious accident. This failure was acknowledged by the US producer BAE, but with these weapons having been set for deployment to the Chinese border their unreliability is likely to compromise India's capabilities.

According to leaked Indian army documents the underperformance of the M777 howitzers was entirely predictable, and the guns had failed to meet critical performance requirements during previous field evaluation trials. According to the Hindustan Times, the Indian army had reported the M777 "had fared poorly in direct firing and air portability trials." Severe shortcomings with the barrel life, minimum range, and anti-skid mechanism were also recorded. The reasons why the military proceeded with the purchases despite this can only be speculated, but they are likely linked to New Delhi's recent moves to strengthen defense ties with Washington - for which increased arms purchases would be a key facilitator of military cooperation. US artillery do have a remarkable history of barrel bursts and accidents, and as recently as August 12th 2017 two US soldiers were killed and five more injured when firing the M777 against Islamic State positions in Iraq. Similarly to the Indian case, the gun malfunctioned and the shell exploded. This was just the most recent of a history of many similar such incidents for the M777. Some examples include the three Australian soldiers injured March 2014 when an M777 malfunctioned. The month before a US soldier had been killed and two more were seriously injured during a live firing of the M777 at Fort Bragg - and three years before ten more personnel were injured in a similar incident with the same weapons system at the same place.

Should India continue to knowingly make costly purchases of flawed weapons systems, it could seriously undermine their military capabilities and leave their armed forces vulnerable to disaster in times of war. The fact that the purchases of the M777 went ahead despite the fact that the military was fully aware of its record for failures is a worrying indicator for the country's acquisition strategy indicating that factors other than a weapons system's performance - be it corruption or currying political favor with Washington. If the M777 is indicative of the acquisition strategies of Indian military as a whole, it could prove to be a highly compromised military force. If on the other hand a lesson can be learned regarding the dangerous consequences of purchasing weapons based on factors other than their capabilities and reliability, the failure of the M777 may well serve as a a wake up call for the Indian military and lead to better planned defense spending in future.

Shown below: BAE M777 Howitzer
I thought it was something wrong with the Indiana ammunition, not the howitzer itself ... but then again, 7 million dollars on one howitzer is extremely overpriced
 
I am sorry to see you so disappointed.
The M777 is a proven platform ... sure it had accidents, but it has a long combat history in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Brand new howitzers breaking down in India is probably related to their ammunition ... which in this case might've been faulty
 
Our expectations are always unrealistically high. It's a simple fact of life, you need to compromise somewhere. It could be range, calibre, weight. You can't have everything top notch.
It can't be ruled out that it was the ammunition that was faulty after all. We don't exactly manufacture quality things.
 
The M777 is a proven platform ... sure it had accidents, but it has a long combat history in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Brand new howitzers breaking down in India is probably related to their ammunition ... which in this case might've been faulty

Your original stand was authentic. Refresh your memory:

US artillery do have a remarkable history of barrel bursts and accidents, and as recently as August 12th 2017 two US soldiers were killed and five more injured when firing the M777 against Islamic State positions in Iraq. Similarly to the Indian case, the gun malfunctioned and the shell exploded. This was just the most recent of a history of many similar such incidents for the M777. Some examples include the three Australian soldiers injured March 2014 when an M777 malfunctioned. The month before a US soldier had been killed and two more were seriously injured during a live firing of the M777 at Fort Bragg - and three years before ten more personnel were injured in a similar incident with the same weapons system at the same place.
 
Your original stand was authentic. Refresh your memory:

US artillery do have a remarkable history of barrel bursts and accidents, and as recently as August 12th 2017 two US soldiers were killed and five more injured when firing the M777 against Islamic State positions in Iraq. Similarly to the Indian case, the gun malfunctioned and the shell exploded. This was just the most recent of a history of many similar such incidents for the M777. Some examples include the three Australian soldiers injured March 2014 when an M777 malfunctioned. The month before a US soldier had been killed and two more were seriously injured during a live firing of the M777 at Fort Bragg - and three years before ten more personnel were injured in a similar incident with the same weapons system at the same place.
Sir.. quality of our OFB manufacturered products is beyond comparison !!!!☺
 
I thought it was something wrong with the Indiana ammunition, not the howitzer itself ... but then again, 7 million dollars on one howitzer is extremely overpriced

This includes an assembly, testing plant by BAE and Mahindra.
 
You can't have everything in a same basket.... Both ia & IAF are alike. Look at LCA ,IAF wants another f22raptor in LCA and messed the entire project.
 
Back
Top Bottom