What's new

How India’s Debt Could Kill Its Growth

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
A look at the threat facing the world’s fastest-growing large economy in six charts
WSJ.com

By Daniel Stacey and Kara Dapena

India is taking a series of aggressive steps to reduce the mountain of bad debts weighing down its banks and threatening to derail the world’s fastest-growing large economy.

India’s parliament last week passed a law empowering its central bank to force some of the country’s largest companies into bankruptcy proceedings. The move follows last year’s overhaul of the bankruptcy code, another attempt to make it faster for creditors to get their money back in a country notorious for drawn-out insolvency proceedings.

India’s efforts come as most of its state banks are struggling with extremely high levels of bad debts, which has dented their ability to make new loans. This, in turn, has pushed down the level of investment to a 13-year low and led economic growth to slow.

Below are six charts illustrating the scope of the issue facing the world’s fastest-growing large economy:

BAD LOANS ARE PILING UP
Indian companies borrowed at record levels a decade ago when the economy was booming. But when the 2008 financial crisis hit, many struggled to find the demand they had anticipated, and started falling behind on their loan repayments.

Last year, more than 9% of all bank loans were deemed nonperforming, meaning that repayments were overdue for more than 90 days. That is a significantly higher ratio than in the U.S. or in other so-called Brics—a group that includes the world’s largest developing countries—with the exception or Russia.


badloans.png


BANKS FACE ADDITIONAL PRESSURE
Compounding the issue, India’s state banks—which account for the lion’s share of the country’s banking sector—may have twice the amount of problematic loans on their books than currently reported, according to Credit Suisse estimates.


The investment bank puts that ratio at above 20%. That number includes restructured loans (loans whose repayment date or amount have been modified because the borrower struggled to repay) and problematic loans not recognized as such by banks (for instance, old loans that are being repaid with new loans), Credit Suisse said in a report released earlier this year.

Credit Suisse said only one of India’s 30-odd major banks had capital buffers large enough to deal with the issue. India’s finance ministry earlier this year said the banks’ bad-loan problem threatened to “derail India’s growth.”



LENDING GROWTH IS GRINDING TO A HALT
As bad debt piles up on their books, state banks are less inclined to make new loans. Private banks with better balance sheets have stepped in to lend more, but they represent only a fraction of India’s banking sector.

Overall, when adjusting for inflation—which averaged 4.5% in the fiscal year ended March—credit growth turned negative in the past financial year, and hit its lowest rate in 23 years, according to India’s finance ministry.

ATTEMPT TO MAKE LOANS CHEAPER IS FALLING FLAT
India’s central bank has tried to help boost lending growth by dropping its key interest rate by 2 percentage points since early 2015, but banks have responded with a measly 0.65-point cut in their base lending rate.

LENDING SLUMP IS HURTING INVESTMENT
As India’s state banks are reluctant to lower rates and lend, even healthy companies can’t borrow as much money as they would like to build or buy things.

As a result, corporate investment as a percentage of India’s GDP has fallen by more than 7 percentage points in the last five years, reaching a 13-year low last year.

ECONOMIC GROWTH IS SUFFERING
Lackluster lending and investment have started to drag down the economy. Last year, gross-domestic-product growth slowed by a percentage point to 7.1%, and shrank by another point again in the first quarter of this year, as manufacturing, agriculture and construction all contracted.


temdbdgft5t.png
 
.
Indian financial outlook no good.

China has subdued India in Telecoms industry, now its US to face the music:

temfnfngt6.png
 
. . .
A look at the threat facing the world’s fastest-growing large economy in six charts
WSJ.com

By Daniel Stacey and Kara Dapena

India is taking a series of aggressive steps to reduce the mountain of bad debts weighing down its banks and threatening to derail the world’s fastest-growing large economy.

India’s parliament last week passed a law empowering its central bank to force some of the country’s largest companies into bankruptcy proceedings. The move follows last year’s overhaul of the bankruptcy code, another attempt to make it faster for creditors to get their money back in a country notorious for drawn-out insolvency proceedings.

India’s efforts come as most of its state banks are struggling with extremely high levels of bad debts, which has dented their ability to make new loans. This, in turn, has pushed down the level of investment to a 13-year low and led economic growth to slow.

Below are six charts illustrating the scope of the issue facing the world’s fastest-growing large economy:

BAD LOANS ARE PILING UP
Indian companies borrowed at record levels a decade ago when the economy was booming. But when the 2008 financial crisis hit, many struggled to find the demand they had anticipated, and started falling behind on their loan repayments.

Last year, more than 9% of all bank loans were deemed nonperforming, meaning that repayments were overdue for more than 90 days. That is a significantly higher ratio than in the U.S. or in other so-called Brics—a group that includes the world’s largest developing countries—with the exception or Russia.


View attachment 419143

BANKS FACE ADDITIONAL PRESSURE
Compounding the issue, India’s state banks—which account for the lion’s share of the country’s banking sector—may have twice the amount of problematic loans on their books than currently reported, according to Credit Suisse estimates.


The investment bank puts that ratio at above 20%. That number includes restructured loans (loans whose repayment date or amount have been modified because the borrower struggled to repay) and problematic loans not recognized as such by banks (for instance, old loans that are being repaid with new loans), Credit Suisse said in a report released earlier this year.

Credit Suisse said only one of India’s 30-odd major banks had capital buffers large enough to deal with the issue. India’s finance ministry earlier this year said the banks’ bad-loan problem threatened to “derail India’s growth.”



LENDING GROWTH IS GRINDING TO A HALT
As bad debt piles up on their books, state banks are less inclined to make new loans. Private banks with better balance sheets have stepped in to lend more, but they represent only a fraction of India’s banking sector.

Overall, when adjusting for inflation—which averaged 4.5% in the fiscal year ended March—credit growth turned negative in the past financial year, and hit its lowest rate in 23 years, according to India’s finance ministry.

ATTEMPT TO MAKE LOANS CHEAPER IS FALLING FLAT
India’s central bank has tried to help boost lending growth by dropping its key interest rate by 2 percentage points since early 2015, but banks have responded with a measly 0.65-point cut in their base lending rate.

LENDING SLUMP IS HURTING INVESTMENT
As India’s state banks are reluctant to lower rates and lend, even healthy companies can’t borrow as much money as they would like to build or buy things.

As a result, corporate investment as a percentage of India’s GDP has fallen by more than 7 percentage points in the last five years, reaching a 13-year low last year.

ECONOMIC GROWTH IS SUFFERING
Lackluster lending and investment have started to drag down the economy. Last year, gross-domestic-product growth slowed by a percentage point to 7.1%, and shrank by another point again in the first quarter of this year, as manufacturing, agriculture and construction all contracted.


View attachment 419144



I think because of that Note Bandy was started by Modi to increase the cash reserves in the Private Banks.
 
.
I think because of that Note Bandy was started by Modi to increase the cash reserves in the Private Banks.

True.
Very true.
You have good knowledge about Indian politics and Modi it seems.
 
.
True.
Very true.
You have good knowledge about Indian politics and Modi it seems.
anti corruption drive and Naxalites were excuses..

main reason was to return favor to investors who heavily invested in Modi's rise to power and convert his image from Butcher to savior..

i still cannot control my laugh whenever i heard rajnath's words after 6 month of note bandi "Naxalion ki humne kamar tor di he".
 
. .
What's wrong in what he said ?


The Non-Performing assets issue is happening in both Public sector as well as private sector banks. The rule to detect stressed assets and declaring it NPA was brought about in the year 2004. Before that the banks used to cook up numbers and declare their results and wait for the government to bail them out.
NPA, in the various banks are due to the gross mismanagement and corruption at the top management level. The ruling government has no direct role in it. The fact that the total NPA's grew from meager 3% in 2008 to 9% in 2017 speaks for itself. Both UPA and NDA, couldn't do much to halt the drastic increase, let alone fix it completely. Please have a look into the following charts for further details.

bad-loans-of-39-banks.jpg


BANK-GNPA-sep-2008-bar-charts.jpg


Bank-npa-march-2009.jpg


bank-npa-march-2014.jpg


bank-npa-sep-2015.jpg


So it's not just Public Banks, even private players were also entangled in this NPA crisis. But can we blame any government for NPA's in banks ICICI, Kotak etc ??? :)
 
.
The Non-Performing assets issue is happening in both Public sector as well as private sector banks. The rule to detect stressed assets and declaring it NPA was brought about in the year 2004. Before that the banks used to cook up numbers and declare their results and wait for the government to bail them out.
NPA, in the various banks are due to the gross mismanagement and corruption at the top management level. The ruling government has no direct role in it. The fact that the total NPA's grew from meager 3% in 2008 to 9% in 2017 speaks for itself. Both UPA and NDA, couldn't do much to halt the drastic increase, let alone fix it completely. Please have a look into the following charts for further details.

bad-loans-of-39-banks.jpg


BANK-GNPA-sep-2008-bar-charts.jpg


Bank-npa-march-2009.jpg


bank-npa-march-2014.jpg


bank-npa-sep-2015.jpg


So it's not just Public Banks, even private players were also entangled in this NPA crisis. But can we blame any government for NPA's in banks ICICI, Kotak etc ??? :)

If Modi stops this, his only dilemma would be "how can my friends Ambanis & Adanis continue without borrowing?"
 
.
The Non-Performing assets issue is happening in both Public sector as well as private sector banks. The rule to detect stressed assets and declaring it NPA was brought about in the year 2004. Before that the banks used to cook up numbers and declare their results and wait for the government to bail them out.
NPA, in the various banks are due to the gross mismanagement and corruption at the top management level. The ruling government has no direct role in it. The fact that the total NPA's grew from meager 3% in 2008 to 9% in 2017 speaks for itself. Both UPA and NDA, couldn't do much to halt the drastic increase, let alone fix it completely. Please have a look into the following charts for further details.

bad-loans-of-39-banks.jpg


BANK-GNPA-sep-2008-bar-charts.jpg


Bank-npa-march-2009.jpg


bank-npa-march-2014.jpg


bank-npa-sep-2015.jpg


So it's not just Public Banks, even private players were also entangled in this NPA crisis. But can we blame any government for NPA's in banks ICICI, Kotak etc ??? :)

The difference is that the corruption in the UPA created the NPA.

The transparency during NDA forced the banks to disclose their NPA and thereby forcing them to clean up their Mess.

See the difference ?

If Modi stops this, his only dilemma would be "how can my friends Ambanis & Adanis continue without borrowing?"

Yeah, its called raising funds in the Capital market.
 
.
I think because of that Note Bandy was started by Modi to increase the cash reserves in the Private Banks.

You can happily wish whatever you want. Even I smell a rat in the whole Demonetization exercise.

But apart for getting liquid surplus cash in Bank's (Both Public and Private) it had helped in increasing the revenue income of the government. Please read the link below if you care and do think about it. :)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/timwor...-a-24-rise-in-tax-returns-filed/#936eb461ab00

The difference is that the corruption in the UPA created the NPA.

The transparency during NDA forced the banks to disclose their NPA and thereby forcing them to clean up their Mess.

See the difference ?



Yeah, its called raising funds in the Capital market.

Ok, even if I agree with you, The NPA was at 4% at the time of the UPA’s exit, but now it has grown to over 9% on record, i.e. almost over double the figure within a span of just 3 years of NDA government. So who should be blamed for that ?? Again UPA, NDA or the Banks ????
 
.
You can happily wish whatever you want. Even I smell a rat in the whole Demonetization exercise.

But apart for getting liquid surplus cash in Bank's (Both Public and Private) it had helped in increasing the revenue income of the government. Please read the link below if you care and do think about it. :)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/timwor...-a-24-rise-in-tax-returns-filed/#936eb461ab00

India's Demonetisation Leads To A 24% Rise In Tax Returns Filed


This has little meaning.
People are filing tax with 100 Rs. to avoid being on radar.

See how much money is coming from IT returns first.
Not significant.

Let Modi media write in his favor, but the facts would speak for themselves down the road:

tax2.png

 
.
Ok, even if I agree with you, The NPA was at 4% at the time of the UPA’s exit, but now it has grown to over 9% on record, i.e. almost over double the figure within a span of just 3 years of NDA government. So who should be blamed for that ?? Again UPA, NDA or the Banks ????

Are you Stupid ?

Those NPA's always existed , they were NOT disclosed by the Banks. They used to be shown as outstanding.

Under the NDA's direction the RBI FORCED the Banks to disclose ALL the NDA's.

THAT is how it became 9 %.

So you need to THANK the NDA. Get it ?
 
.
Are you Stupid ?

Those NPA's always existed , they were NOT disclosed by the Banks. They used to be shown as outstanding.

Under the NDA's direction the RBI FORCED the Banks to disclose ALL the NDA's.

THAT is how it became 9 %.

So you need to THANK the NDA. Get it ?


Again you are being stupid here. The whole exercise of NPA assessment was started only in 2004 globally. The reserve bank of India and Government of India (UPA-II) had under the RBI (especially under governor Raghuram Rajan) already made the rules strict and made it mandatory for the PSU banks as well as other scheduled banks to report their gross NPA way back in 2009, well before the NDA came to power in March 2014 understood. Please check the related news from that period below.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ionalised-banks-soar/articleshow/22015086.cms

http://www.thehindu.com/business/In...rnment-scanner-chidambaram/article5260786.ece

http://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/net-npa-rises-to-168-in-201213-rbi/article5186516.ece

So attributing this whole NPA and stressed assets reporting banks to the strict rules purely implemented by NDA is totally wrong. Also what you said doesn't make an IOTA of sense, the gross NPA reported for the FY 2013-14 was 4%, then how it became 9% within a span of just three years ?? If you have a logical answer please let me know. And please don't tell me that the banks never reported the NPA's before the NDA government, that's totally wrong.

In this matter both the UPA and NDA are equally culpable, how I'll tell you, there is an organization Named Purti Group, The main promoter is Mr. Nitin Gadkari (Ex-President BJP and an incumbent Minister of NDA). It is one of the groups which is contributing to gross NPA of certain banks and financial institutions. Even the CAG in the past had found irregularities by this group and had proposed the then government to take action, but nothing happened during UPA or even NDA. Which means both congress and BJP are hand in glove in that case.

In an audit report tabled in Parliament on Thursday, the Comptroller and Auditor-General (CAG) named Union Minister Nitin Gadkari as one of the “promoters and/or directors” of Purti Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a company that, it said, was sanctioned a loan of Rs. 84.12 crore by the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) in violation of guidelines.

“… IREDA could recover only Rs. 71.35 crore out of Rs. 84.12 crore recoverable from the borrower, resulting in a sacrifice of Rs. 12.77 crore,” the report said. The contentions of the management of Purti for doing so were untenable, it added.

Purti Sakhar Karkhana did not comply with the conditions for the interest subsidy, the report observed, saying: “The borrower violated the terms and conditions for subsidy schemes.”

The project, which was to be commissioned in February 2004, was finally commissioned in March 2007 and subsequently switched over (June 2009) to 100 per cent coal-based operation as against an allowance of up to 25 per cent prescribed in the subsidy scheme.

The promoters and/or directors of the borrower company had given their personal guarantee for the loan.

The project was commissioned on March 18, 2007, and the case was classified as a non-performing asset on March 31, 2007.

Loan turns NPA
Though the loan became a non-performing asset (NPA) in March 2007, the actual benefit of the subsidy amounting to Rs.1.66 crore was passed on till December 2009 and unutilised subsidy of Rs.0.22 crore refunded to the Ministry in August 2010.

According to the CAG audit, “Various irregularities in implementation of the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy’s subsidy schemes were observed”

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/purti-violations-cag-report-names-gadkari/article7160039.ece

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...dkari-gave-guarantee/articleshow/47123353.cms

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...urti-shell-companies/articleshow/17355385.cms

If the NDA were sincere enough, why not initiate an enquiry, let alone try to recover the NPA/unpaid loan from Purti Industries ??
 
.
Back
Top Bottom