What's new

GST bill passed in Rajya Sabha clearing way for unified tax regime

Water Car Engineer

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 25, 2010
Messages
13,313
Reaction score
8
Country
United States
Location
India
GST bill passed in Rajya Sabha clearing way for unified tax regime

New Delhi: The wait for the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is finally over.

The Rajya Sabha on Wednesday voted to pass the constitution amendment bill on GST, setting the stage for the most comprehensive tax reforms.

The debate witnessed a resumption of the tussle between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress on the legacy of this pathbreaking reform. The BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) being the government in power is the logical inheritor, but the Congress which championed the cause for a decade, but failed to pass it is equally keen to own it.

It will in public perception burnish the reformist credentials of the NDA, particularly prime minister Narendra Modi.

Introducing the bill in the Rajya Sabha, finance minister Arun Jaitley said, “This is one of the most significant tax reforms in India in recent history. This reform has been debated within the political and economic system of India for almost 15 years,” he said.  

“I am sure the enactment of the GST will bring out the best as far as economic management. It will empower the states. It will increase revenue of the states and the central government. It will provide a boost to the economy. It will bring down tax evasion and eliminate tax on tax,” he added.

Also read: GST bill: The story so far

the GST Bill will have to be ratified by 50% of the states. Subsequently, a GST council will be set up comprising state finance ministers and the union finance minister which will take important decisions like the rates, threshold and dual control.

Thereafter, two legislations—central GST and integrated GST will have to be passed by Parliament and a state GST legislation by the state legislatures.

Striking a conciliatory note at the beginning of the debate, Jaitley said “The proposal was to radically change the taxation structure and the government felt the need for a larger consensus.”

Leading the opposition in the debate, former finance minister P. Chidambaram acknowledged the conciliation and emphasised the need for consensus on this marquee tax reform initiative.

“I welcome the friendly and conciliatory tone of the FM’s speech. It is far too important a legislation to be passed on a partisan basis.The Congress party has never opposed the idea of GST,” he said.

And of course he reiterated several times that the Congress was the original author of the bill and that it was opposed to the legislation proposed by the NDA not to the concept of GST.

His sharpest criticism of the government was reserved for its rejection of the demand made by the Congress to cap the revenue neutral GST rate at 18%.

“The central government will have to include the tax rate in the GST bill that will follow the constitution amendment. The Congress will launch a sustained campaign to ensure that the GST bill that will be subsequently be brought by the government for Parliament’s approval should mention the 18% cap on the standard rate”, he said.

Also read: GST bill: Five things to know

He also pointed out that GST rate being an indirect tax should be kept as low as possible as it impacts everyone irrespective of their income levels. Citing the report of the chief economic advisor Arvind Subramanian, Chidambaram pushed for a standard rate of 18% for most goods and services.

AIADMK members walk outed from Rajya Sabha, saying their concerns over GST were not addressed

Passage of the constitution amendment bill in Rajya Sabha paves the way for the implementation of GST from the next fiscal year. The government was aiming to implement GST from 1 April 2017 but may delay it by a few months to ensure a smooth implementation.

GST aims to unite the country into a common market by removing all barriers across states. If implemented successfully, it is expected to add upto 2% to the country’s gross domestic product, increase the tax base and ensure revenue buoyancy.

The constitution amendment bill received Lok Sabha’s nod in May last year but was stuck after the Congress party insisted that three of it demands—capping the GST rate in the bill at 18%, doing away with the additional 1% tax and the need for an independent dispute resolution authority. The government subsequently acceded to the Congress’ demands of removing the 1% tax and changed the language of the dispute resolution clause marginally.
 
.
Good Solid Development

Wrong section for his news

@waz @WebMaster
Pls move this thread to Central and South Asia section.

On topic

I am looking at 2℅ addition to GDP

Let's hit double digits... That would be a great achievement and hopefully without controversies
 
.
It seems state of TN is getting a bad deal from GST. Already this year TN got less allocation under new planning body NITI Aayog, which emphasised more funds for under-developed and developing states. And TN being an manufacturing power-house, wont be earning much taxes from it, as it is levied on places where it is sold.

I do not understand, despite showing good development on Industrialisation, Agri, HDI, states like UP, Bihar, MP, Kashmir get more funds year after year for their failure. Over population is not an excuse for them anymore. I can understand funds for tribal states like Jharkhand, Chattisgarh, NE etc. But not for others.

I hope NITI Aayog really shows some financial encouragement for those states who show results.
 
.
There is already a lengthy thread running

It seems state of TN is getting a bad deal from GST. Already this year TN got less allocation under new planning body NITI Aayog, which emphasised more funds for under-developed and developing states. And TN being an manufacturing power-house, wont be earning much taxes from it, as it is levied on places where it is sold.

I do not understand, despite showing good development on Industrialisation, Agri, HDI, states like UP, Bihar, MP, Kashmir get more funds year after year for their failure. Over population is not an excuse for them anymore. I can understand funds for tribal states like Jharkhand, Chattisgarh, NE etc. But not for others.

I hope NITI Aayog really shows some financial encouragement for those states who show results.

This is false propoganda by AIADMK -- just political ego

DMK was supporting it and ABOVE ALL

Tamil Nadu has Chidambaram and many other experts who would have RED flagged
GST if it was Anti Tamil Nadu
 
.
There is already a lengthy thread running



This is false propoganda by AIADMK -- just political ego

DMK was supporting it and ABOVE ALL

Tamil Nadu has Chidambaram and many other experts who would have RED flagged
GST if it was Anti Tamil Nadu

DMK has no members in LS. It was 2 members in RS for now. I also didnt see any statement by Karunanidhi supporting GST. Infact he is silent and testing the waters. Chidambaram as we all know was the finance minister who framed the GST. There is no way he is going to oppose it.
I am not against GST. It is needed. But in a federal structure, the states who are doing good should be rewarded. But TN and even AP is not being rewarded.
TN must be compensated for 3 years I guess. ADMK arguement holds water. GST will bring loss of revenue to TN state.
 
.
It seems state of TN is getting a bad deal from GST. Already this year TN got less allocation under new planning body NITI Aayog, which emphasised more funds for under-developed and developing states. And TN being an manufacturing power-house, wont be earning much taxes from it, as it is levied on places where it is sold.

I do not understand, despite showing good development on Industrialisation, Agri, HDI, states like UP, Bihar, MP, Kashmir get more funds year after year for their failure. Over population is not an excuse for them anymore. I can understand funds for tribal states like Jharkhand, Chattisgarh, NE etc. But not for others.

I hope NITI Aayog really shows some financial encouragement for those states who show results.


Barring Kashmir, none of the state you mentioned are getting more funds than they deserve. It is only hill and tribal states which get more than they deserve or contribute.
 
.
DMK has no members in LS. It was 2 members in RS for now. I also didnt see any statement by Karunanidhi supporting GST. Infact he is silent and testing the waters. Chidambaram as we all know was the finance minister who framed the GST. There is no way he is going to oppose it.
I am not against GST. It is needed. But in a federal structure, the states who are doing good should be rewarded. But TN and even AP is not being rewarded.
TN must be compensated for 3 years I guess. ADMK arguement holds water. GST will bring loss of revenue to TN state.

ALL states will get compensated for FIVE YEARS

No problem for states
 
.
Barring Kashmir, none of the state you mentioned are getting more funds than they deserve. It is only hill and tribal states which get more than they deserve or contribute.

Isn’t it time the South received it's due?

After all, 20% of the population contributes a full 30% of India's tax revenues. This is the money that runs the country.

A measly fifth of the population sponsors India's tax revenues to the tune of a third of the total, and in return, the five Deccan states get a paltry 18% of funds allocated back from the centre.

south%20india%20economy%20tara%201%20bs_1.jpg


The state allocations speak to the quantum of skew. While Tamil Nadu gets about 40 paise for every rupee it generates for the centre, Uttar Pradesh fattens itself on Rs 1.8 per rupee it generates. It should be remembered that Uttar Pradesh had a distinct economic and social advantage over the southern states coming out of British rule, which it has simply squandered away through mis-governance and profligacy

FFC-Transfers-Final.jpg


For some reason mineral rich state Jharkhand is ignored.

http://www.thenewsminute.com/articl...ern-collective-get-us-better-deal-delhi-46501

I hope guys dont see it as a North vs South thing. Such discussions are needed in a healthy federal country. In countries such as USA, states decides whether they want death penalty or not. The thing is more federal power to states regarding financial and economical models, which forces failing states to generate their own revenue.
 
.
south%20india%20economy%20tara%201%20bs_1.jpg




FFC-Transfers-Final.jpg


For some reason mineral rich state Jharkhand is ignored.

http://www.thenewsminute.com/articl...ern-collective-get-us-better-deal-delhi-46501

I hope guys dont see it as a North vs South thing. Such discussions are needed in a healthy federal country. In countries such as USA, states decides whether they want death penalty or not. The thing is more federal power to states regarding financial and economical models, which forces failing states to generate their own revenue.


Just imagine if UP can get it's act together. Damn thing is a country, within a country!
 
.
Just imagine if UP can get it's act together. Damn thing is a country, within a country!

Its a population of 22 crores and counting. Bigger than Pakistan and Indonesia. And Add Bihar to it.

The good doing states cannot be punished for the sins of failure states. Dot. Just imagine how much income it can raise from Varnasi. How much income tax it can raise if there is development. Its time states are punished. Its people should be punished for electing an govt which fails year after year. Not that BJP alone is the only alternative. even they have ruled UP at one point
 
.
Its a population of 22 crores and counting. Bigger than Pakistan and Indonesia. And Add Bihar to it.

The good doing states cannot be punished for the sins of failure states. Dot. Just imagine how much income it can raise from Varnasi. How much income tax it can raise if there is development. Its time states are punished. Its people should be punished for electing an govt which fails year after year. Not that BJP alone is the only alternative. even they have ruled UP at one point

And that is the problem. This State needs to be made smaller -- 4 states.
 
.
south%20india%20economy%20tara%201%20bs_1.jpg




FFC-Transfers-Final.jpg


For some reason miacknowledge state Jharkhand is ignored.

http://www.thenewsminute.com/articl...ern-collective-get-us-better-deal-delhi-46501

I hope guys dont see it as a North vs South thing. Such discussions are needed in a healthy federal country. In countries such as USA, states decides whether they want death penalty or not. The thing is more federal power to states regarding financial and economical models, which forces failing states to generate their own revenue.

The relatively smaller educated ( University Graduates ) here ( Jharkhand ) do acknowledge about how despite possessing 33% of Coal Deposits , except Ranchi , and Jamshedpur and Bokaro ( Being Industrial Centres ) , rest of the state has less and less power compared to even what people across state borders have. The intellectuals often claim the financially weak Jharkhand State Electricity Board , but should it not be a priority up the central government which dreams to run India's GDP higher by mining Jharkhand out ?

Its only a matter of time that more locals here get higher education , and god forbid of governments continue their present policy , Jharkhand will be a hot bed for Communists.... if it already hasn't started to.

The cities built by former Soviet Republics here are crumbling , they should have been the first preferences for Smart City projects , but....
 
.
Good Solid Development

Wrong section for his news

@waz @WebMaster
Pls move this thread to Central and South Asia section.

On topic

I am looking at 2℅ addition to GDP

Let's hit double digits... That would be a great achievement and hopefully without controversies
I think statement made by some NDA politicians regarding the 1-2% addition in GDP is just a exaggerated statement. I don't think there will be this much addition to the GDP, this system is made for the large corporate(specially keeping FDI in mind) and it promotes regressive taxing on the poor section of the society. But I think, if implemented properly this could help the manufacturing companies in overcoming the complex tax regime of India. Plus I don't see GST getting implemented before FY 2018, there are too many hurdles for the GST.
 
.
The relatively smaller educated ( University Graduates ) here ( Jharkhand ) do acknowledge about how despite possessing 33% of Coal Deposits , except Ranchi , and Jamshedpur and Bokaro ( Being Industrial Centres ) , rest of the state has less and less power compared to even what people across state borders have. The intellectuals often claim the financially weak Jharkhand State Electricity Board , but should it not be a priority up the central government which dreams to run India's GDP higher by mining Jharkhand out ?

Its only a matter of time that more locals here get higher education , and god forbid of governments continue their present policy , Jharkhand will be a hot bed for Communists.... if it already hasn't started to.

The cities built by former Soviet Republics here are crumbling , they should have been the first preferences for Smart City projects , but....

I know its astonishing. Despite supplying coal to India, Jharkhand is in dark..
 
.
I know its astonishing. Despite supplying coal to India, Jharkhand is in dark..

Surprising thing is that the requiremts too aren't big by any standard. We had a Super Thermal Power plantplanned ( it would have been alone enough to take care of our needs , along with proposed hydle and 1 small thermal plant ( under construction ) at Bokaro , but Reliance won the tender and then left the project citing huge costs , and years have passed since then without any movement.

I would not say any further than just saying that the semi precious stones sold through our India are " Ileagaly" mined by Naxals here with support from Red brigade and recently 2 higher placed leaders of Secular Parties.

This joint venture is earning then money and is the prime reason why we still see Politicians proposing peace with Naxals.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom