What's new

greece’s tsipras and tripura’s manik sarkar - two communists in perspective

jamahir

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
28,132
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
India
Greece’s Tsipras And Tripura’s Manik Sarkar: Two Communists In Perspective

BY SAEED NAQVI


Upon my return from a driving trip around Europe, the front page anchor of the Indian Express caught my eye. It showed Union Minister for Communication and Information Technology, Ravi Shankar Prasad in a warm handshake with the Communist Chief Minister of Tripura, Manik Sarkar, at the inauguration of an Internet Gateway in Agartala.

Even more striking was the treatment the newspaper gave to the headline which encapsuled raw, facts: the state has an astounding record in the incidence of crime, civilians killed, security personnel killed, kidnappings, encounters, rebels killed. The figure on every count is ZERO.

When a former Director General of Police in Tripura, B.L. Vohra a year ago gave me similar figures for the previous year, I rubbed my eyes with disbelief. I had never imagined a senior police officer, conservative to the core, in such ecstatic praise of a communist Chief Minister.

So, last April, I turned up in Agartala. Lo and behold, I found myself seated in the presence of the present DG Police, K. Nagaraj, endorsing all the figures I see on page one of the newspaper today.

Ofcourse, at the top of the page, across six columns, are stories related to the Vyapam scam, but I found the Tripura story heartwarming. This, for a variety of reasons including the unstated petrifaction at Europe grappling with communism in Greece, then possibly Pablo Iglesias’s Leftism in Spain and similar streaks in all of Latin Europe.

India had its first communist government in Kerala in 1957 snuffed out by Indira Gandhi.

For 35 years, Jyoti Basu, a communist to boot, ruled West Bengal until his successors fatally mishandled the land issue.

All of that later. Let me, for my immediate purposes, try and explain the Tripura phenomenon, from my notebook.

The State has been ploughing its furrow diligently with some quite extraordinary results on the Human Development scale and which no one discusses. Has the State with a population of 40 lakhs, not been in focus because it is small? Only Sikkim and Goa are smaller. Or has the media thus far been squeamish about applauding a State which for 32 of the past 37 years has been under Left Front rule? It was for this reason the page one display was striking. I had seen nothing positive about the new Greek political preference in European newspapers. The contrast was refreshing.

Some of its records are amazing. Its 96 percent literacy makes it the country’s most literate State. Literacy rate in Gujarat is 83 per cent. Kerala was once the leader but its Human Development record in recent years has been slipping.

Life expectancy of 71 years for men and 73 for women in Tripura too is a record. In Gujarat, it is 64 and 66. Tripura’s Bengali population ruins the absence of gender bias among tribals. Even so, it is 961 as against 918 in Gujarat.

The great genius the leadership has demonstrated is in grasping an essential truth: like politics, good governance too is essentially the art of the possible. Instead of beating its breast and flailing its arm around, the regime picked up all the Central and State schemes, put its head down, called in the officials, party cadres, involved the three tier Panchayati Raj system and gave a sense of real participation to the elected Autonomous District Councils which cover two thirds of the State and all the Tribal areas of Tripura.

This is the key. The basic conflict in the State, one which exploded as the fiercest insurgency in the North East, was on the tribal-non tribal faultline.

Under the Maharajas, who figure in mythology, Tripura was overwhelmingly tribal. But after the creation of East Pakistan (later Bangladesh), Hindu Bengalis from contiguous territories that were once managed by the Maharaja, migrated to Tripura. The tribals, (a total of 19 tribes) became a minority in the State. The 70:30 ratio in favour of the tribals was exactly inverted. Today 70 percent of the population is Bengali.

The Congress, its eye always on the main chance, fell back on the simple divide and rule strategy, pocketing the Bengali vote bank. If ever there was a shortfall, there was always a tribe to be played against the other.

A great tribal, communist leader, Dashrath Deb saw the future. He launched Jana Shiksha Abhiyan or campaign for education among tribals in 1945 forcing the Maharaja to recognize 500 primary schools, which mushroomed and today saturate the State – a school every kilometer.

It was from this wide base that the tribals gravitated towards communism while the Bengalis were turning towards the Congress. While the Congress was content with sectarian divine, a leader like Nripen Chakraborty accurately gauged the difficult social reality: without tribal support all Bengali agenda would be circumscribed. Likewise, tribals would not advance without Bengali help. The call went out: tribal-non tribal unity was the absolute imperative.

The idea flared up, across the State for two reasons. Tribals, who had taken to communism in the 40s and 50s, grasped the idea instantly. In driblets, Bengalis too came into the fold. So, while the Left slowly expanded its platform of unity, the Congress persisted with its Bengali focus, not without electoral gains. True, the Left Front has 50 seats in a House of 60, but the 36 percent of the opposition vote share must be largely credited to the Congress.

What keeps the electorate, indeed the population persistently in the Left’s thrall is the universally accepted incorruptibility of the leadership. Congress MLA Gopal Roy shook his head in agreement “personal incorruptibility cannot be denied”.

The first Left Front Chief Minister Nripen Chakraborty (1978 to 88) entered and left the official residence with same two tin trunks – full of clothes, books, and a shaving kit. Grocery purchases for the CM’s household were made on a ration card. Modern capitalism would probably consider him an outcast because he never had a bank account.

His disciple, Manik Sarkar, Chief Minister for 17 years without a break, is equally austere. His wife, a school teacher, goes to work on a rickshaw.

In efficient implementation of central schemes, the State has no parallels. Clinics, schools, anganwadi, infant and mother care, electricity distribution and, above all, building roads, connecting the remotest areas.

Heaven knows what feedback Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, has on his Swatch Bharat or clean India mission, but if he were to send his officers to some of the more remote parts of Tripura, they would rub their eyes with wonder at what has been achieved in such a short period.

The road from Agartala winds around Longtarai hill range to Ambassa, about 80 kms away. A measure of the administration’s reach is Kumardhan Para, at a forbidding height.

A few years ago, folks at the village walked 18 kms to reach grocery stores in Ambassa. Today the Kumardhan peak has been conquered; a motorable road has been laid right upto the village centre. Little wonder Milind Ramteke, IAS, Collector of Ambassa (Dhallai) and his Block Development Officer, Amitabh Chakma, are local heroes, village after village.

The problems of Tripura, in a sense, begin now. The King of Bhutan floated the idea of Gross National Happiness. That, roughly, has been Tripura’s trajectory. It is now on an efficient welfare plateau. What next? It has an inimitable school network. But very little by way of college and technical education. There are no openings for the educated youth. The State, surrounded on three sides by Bangladesh looks admiringly at Shaikh Haseena. Indo-Bangla friendship will give it access to Chittagong port, 70 kms away.

The regime is not paranoid, but it is “aware” that the Church networks affect both college and post college job scene. A middle class so created is inherently anti “Left”, says a CPM leader. Moreover, further penetration by the Church would provide an opening to Hindutva forces to enter the scene with a countervailing sectarian agenda.

---------

(Saeed Naqvi is a senior Indian journalist, television commentator, interviewer, and a Distinguished Fellow at Observer Research Foundation. Mr. Naqvi is also a mentor and a guest blogger with Canary Trap)

source - Greece’s Tsipras And Tripura’s Manik Sarkar: Two Communists In Perspective | Canary Trap

----------

@levina @WAJsal @BDforever @bongbang
 
It is now on an efficient welfare plateau. What next? It has an inimitable school network. But very little by way of college and technical education. There are no openings for the educated youth. The State, surrounded on three sides by Bangladesh looks admiringly at Shaikh Haseena. Indo-Bangla friendship will give it access to Chittagong port, 70 kms away.

BBIN will give them chance to use Chittagong port.
But they should be aware the plot of raw-congress-US nexus to keep communism out of the region. They successfully managed to do it in WB.
 
BBIN will give them chance to use Chittagong port.

ah.

and i hope that opportunity will be used by the state government to sate the middle-class youth by creating a technology-based employment environment so that they don't begin to fall into dissent.

and i see bangladesh as more progressive than india in certain factors so i hope bangladeshi influence can come in too.

do you know if bangladeshi films and bangladeshi literary culture goes into tripura or other states bordering bd??

But they should be aware the plot of raw-congress-US nexus to keep communism out of the region. They successfully managed to do it in WB.

correct.
 
I know what communists are capable of, hint: China rail official given death sentence for corruption - BBC News

Manoj Sarkar is a one the poorest CMs in India and is a good leader. But I'm not sure you can say so about every communist, for example Samar Acharjee, a Tripura communist lawmaker who was found neck deep in corruption. Tripura's achievement, to an extent can be credited to its government, but assuming that every communist party would achieve the same results is impetuous, Communist party down south is just as corrupt as congress.
Left has long lost its lustre because they refused to see the metamorphosis India was going through. They turned a blind eye towards the economic liberalisation, they failed to see that the youth today values cultural nationalism and spirituality, and that the Marxist-Leninist leaders have lost their appeal.
They say in this world only change is permanent. Communist party has refused to change, so it's slowly being pushed to obscurity.
 
I know what communists are capable of, hint: China rail official given death sentence for corruption - BBC News

Manoj Sarkar is a one the poorest CMs in India and is a good leader. But I'm not sure you can say so about every communist, for example Samar Acharjee, a Tripura communist lawmaker who was found neck deep in corruption. Tripura's achievement, to an extent can be credited to its government, but assuming that every communist party would achieve the same results is impetuous, Communist party down south is just as corrupt as congress.
Left has long lost its lustre because they refused to see the metamorphosis India was going through. They turned a blind eye towards the economic liberalisation, they failed to see that the youth today values cultural nationalism and spirituality, and that the Marxist-Leninist leaders have lost their appeal.
They say in this world only change is permanent. Communist party has refused to change, so it's slowly being pushed to obscurity.


Communists have also done wonderful job in Kerala and west Bengal so all your points are moot

Inquilab Zindabad
 
Look like the Commnists's with the help of the Muslim "seculars" are back to spinning propaganda and lies :lol: ............... pretty similar to how "kerala progressed" because the kerla communists built schools :cheesy:

5 lies spread by Manik Sarkar about Tripura history | The North East Today|Delivering news upto the minute

Over the last few years the Communist led state government and the Tripura Royal Family have been at loggerheads on various issues. While the Chief Minister continues to win each and every election with ease, he does realize that his biggest challenge to greatness comes when he is pitted against the glorious tradition of the Manikya Kings. We take a point by point analysis what the truth is all about and the results you will see are startling:

LIE NO 1: That there were a handful of schools during the Maharaja’s time?

Tripura-school.jpg


TRUTH: If we go by old gazette and documentary evidence Tripura had over a 160 schools some which date back to the early 1860’s. Many schools were demolished or remain in dilapidated condition after the Independence largely due to the ignorance of the State governments.

LIE NO 2:The Maharaja did nothing for the ADC and only the CPM bought it into effect in 1983

Tripura-Maharajas.jpg


TRUTH: Actually way back in 1939-40 Maharaja Bir Bikram bought in an act where no land will be sold to any community other than belonging to the Panch Tripura. Most of the sub tribes here such as the Hrangkhawl, Kalai, Molsom, Kaipeng, Garo, Noatia besides the major tribes of Bru, Jamatia and Tripuri community were clearly covered in this act. The areas earmarked by the Maharaja is the basis of the creation of TTADC and not otherwise

LIE NO 3: That the Royal Family did not want to merge with India and become a part of East Pakistan

East-Pakistan.jpg


TRUTH: The immediate Royal Family had already started the process of democratization with a set up more prevalent in Bhutan and smaller European countries where the King would be the titular head and the government would be chosen from the electoral franchise. There are enough documents to prove this contrary to what Manik Sarkar may say. When there was a uprising from sections, the instrument of merger was signed only after the Government gave Tripura state certain guarantee for the preservation of our laws, custom and rights.

LIE NO 4:That the Royal family consented to sell away the palaces to the state government for profit

Ujjayanta-Palace.jpg


TRUTH: Successive government forcibly acquired properties of the Maharaja and till date Neer Mahal is still in the name of the Maharaja and a case is being fought in this matter. The State government however cannot explain how they have received hundreds of crores by the central government on a property which the state itself acknowledges and concedes that is in the name of the Maharaja.

LIE NO 5:That the Maharaja tried to ignore the local population of the Tribal and promoted the Bengali culture

Tripura-dance.jpg


TRUTH: Being tribals themselves, the Maharaja reserved lands for the indigenous population, started schools in rural areas where equal importance was given to English, Kok Borok, Bengali and even Sanskrit (Many such schools were shut down after Tripura became a part of India).

People like Dashrath Deb actually got help from the state treasury to study outside in Kolkata for higher education. Contrary to what is said the immediate Royal Family continues to follow indigenous practices and food habits of the Tribals. The current head today speaks and understands Kok Borok, Bengali, Khasi, Garo, Nepali, Hindi fluently as well as many other languages from the Northeast. However the state continues to spread this misinformation as a policy ironically Manik Sarkar who is the longest serving Chief Minister cannot claim to know another state language other than Bengali.
 
Communists are capable of doing great things. Forcing a mother to eat rice laced with her son's blood is just one among those.
 
Maybe somebody can explain that how under "communist" rule, the population of Bengali's rose from 30 % to 70%, thus dominating Tripura.

For those who dont know , "Bengali's" = "Bangladeshi's" :P
 
Tripura is clean state and with Manik Sarkar at the helm, it can achieve greatness. But the same cannot be told for communists in Kerala or WB or at the centre. Manik Sarkar shouldnt be even compared with those like Prakash Karat or D.Raja. Those in Delhi are leechers and expert at playing anti development
 
and i see bangladesh as more progressive than india in certain factors so i hope bangladeshi influence can come in too.

Thanks. They are actually Bangladeshi. Just not living in BD. You can see they made the place civil. Tripurans feel more close to Bangladeshis. And they harbored Bangladeshis in 71 war. So AL gov is soft towards them and for these years many works have been done to improve relation with Tripura. And Tripura border is also relatively calm.

do you know if bangladeshi films and bangladeshi literary culture goes into tripura or other states bordering bd??

Bangladeshi films are not popular in BD itself. But cultural exchange happens by artists of both places. But Tripurans are culturally more close to WB.
@chaanmia
 
Thanks. They are actually Bangladeshi. Just not living in BD. You can see they made the place civil. Tripurans feel more close to Bangladeshis. And they harbored Bangladeshis in 71 war. So AL gov is soft towards them and for these years many works have been done to improve relation with Tripura. And Tripura border is also relatively calm.

Bangladeshi films are not popular in BD itself. But cultural exchange happens by artists of both places. But Tripurans are culturally more close to WB.
@chaanmia

LOL.....looks like you and Jamati jamahir got it wrong and seemed confused.

The Bangladeshi's in Tripura are HINDU REFUGEES :lol: ......... driven out of BD by your "muslim brothers" from Chittagon and other hill tracks.

Tripura is still 85% Hindus.... though its share has come down from 86% in the last decade.
 
LOL.....looks like you and Jamati jamahir got it wrong and seemed confused.

The Bangladeshi's in Tripura are HINDU REFUGEES :lol: ......... driven out of BD by your "muslim brothers" from Chittagon and other hill tracks.

Tripura is still 85% Hindus.... though its share has come down from 86% in the last decade.

Hindus whom are evicted from BD are also Bangledeshis, I meant it.
 
Back
Top Bottom