Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You did not read the OP. The OP states such petitions were normal, but Savarkar was one of only 2 men who renounced their revolutionary past in the petitions and furthermore in his petition he offered to be "politically useful" (Savarkar's own words) to the colonial government if released. After his release his writings had an interesting change, from one of "Indian struggle for freedom from colonialism" to "Hindu struggle against Muslims". He never again wrote anything against the British.
Nothing surprising here. All Hindutvawadis are boot lickers of the British. The current generation is no exception.
for getting hinduraj everything is right . now we have hinduraj in india . jo ukhar sakte ho ukhar lo .
It is so lovely to learn that you now have Hinduraj in India. So how did your life change under this Hinduraj?
hinduraj has secured kashmir , 370 and 35 are gone .
hinduraj has recovered our sriram mandir
hinduraj will recover kashivishwanath temple
hinduraj will recover krishna janmmbhumi mandir .
hinduraj has abolished triple talaq for muslim sisters .
hinduraj will abolish halala for benefit of muslim sisters .
The question was "how did your life change" under Hinduraj?
Not "how were Muslims made miserable" under Hinduraj?
good job now apply for visa of your heaven created specially for you people if you don't want to live in hinduraj
Looks like your life is still shitty under Hinduraj. You sole source of joy is that Hinduraj has made lives for Muslims miserable. smh!
Yes, and no that's not the "point of OP". So "useful" to British he was that he was under strict surveillance 13 years after his incarceration.
someone who doesn't even know when Savarkar was released from jail!
hinduraj has secured kashmir , 370 and 35 are gone .
hinduraj has recovered our sriram mandir
hinduraj will recover kashivishwanath temple
hinduraj will recover krishna janmmbhumi mandir .
hinduraj has abolished triple talaq for muslim sisters .
hinduraj will abolish halala for benefit of muslim sisters .
Did hinduraj stop rape of minor hindu girls?
Did hinduraj stop rape of adult hindu girls?
Did hinduraj stop marital rape of Hindu girls?
Did hinduraj make India any safer for Hindu women or Dalits?
Did hinduraj eliminate 53% Indians shitting in the open?
Did hinduraj get you cleaner air in Indian cities?
Did hinduraj get you better wages? Afaik, even BD GDP per capita surpassed you during hinduraj.
Why do you obsess about things that have literally no tangible affect in your lives and go about raping and lynching minorities? Is that what hindu religion teaches about hinduraj?
for getting hinduraj everything is right . now we have hinduraj in india . jo ukhar sakte ho ukhar lo .
hinduraj has abolished triple talaq for muslim sisters.
Maneka Gandhi, minister of women and child development, recently gave a call for prenuptial agreements to be recognised in India. According to her, if the terms for division of property, guardianship of children and spousal support are settled prior to marriage, divorces will be less acrimonious and disputes could be resolved expeditiously.
In the discussions that followed, as to whether such a step will, in fact, safeguard the rights of women, there was no mention that this concept is already rooted in Islamic law of marriage since the 7th century. The nikahnama, an Islamic marriage contract is, in fact, a prenuptial agreement that outlines the rights and responsibilities of the parties and provides for conditions to be included for safeguarding a woman’s rights upon marriage.
One wonders why a reference to the Islamic law was not made either by the minister or other experts. Married Muslim women, we find, are often on a higher and more secure footing than their counterparts from other religions. In fact, as a Christian marrying a Muslim, I chose to marry under the Muslim personal law, even over the seemingly modern Special Marriage Act, 1954, to better secure my economic rights. My mehr was a house in my name and my nikahnama includes necessary clauses to safeguard my and my children’s rights. My husband’s family members were witness to this document, which is registered and enforceable by law.
When we examine marriage laws in their historic context, it is interesting to note that the universally accepted notion that marriages are contractual rather than sacramental originates in Muslim law, which was accepted by the French law only in the 1800s and incorporated into the English law in the 1850s and became part of codified Hindu law as late as 1955. Today it appears to be the most practical way of dealing with the institution of marriage. Treating marriage as a sacrament which binds the parties for life has resulted in some of the most discriminatory practices against women such as sati and denial of right to divorce and remarriage, even in the most adverse conditions.
The cornerstone of a Muslim marriage is consent, ejab-o-qubul (proposal and acceptance) and requires the bride to accept the marriage proposal on her own free will. This freedom to consent (or refuse), which was given to Muslim women 1,400 years ago, is still not available under Hindu law since sacramental rituals such as saptapadi and kanya dan (seven steps round the nuptial fire and gifting of the bride to the groom) still form essential ceremonies of a Hindu marriage. Even after the codification of Hindu law, the notion of consent is not built into the marriage ceremonies.
The contract of marriage (nikahnama) allows for negotiated terms and conditions, it can also include the right to a delegated divorce (talaq-e-tafweez) where the woman is delegated the right to divorce her husband if any of the negotiated terms and conditions are violated.
Mehr is another unique concept of Muslim law meant to safeguard the financial future of the wife. It is an obligation, not a choice, and can be in the form of cash, valuables or securities. While there is no ceiling, a minimum amount to provide her security after marriage must be stipulated. This is a more beneficial concept than streedhan which is given by choice and usually by the natal family. In addition to Mehr, at the time of divorce, a Muslim woman has the right to fair and reasonable settlement, and this is statutorily recognised under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 as per the 2001 ruling of the Supreme Court in the Daniel Latifi case.
How’s the cow situation in hinduraj?hinduraj is doing it's job fine , some quarters are in pain , we can not do much to sooth them .