What's new

Genocide of Rohingya phenotypes: Indo-Aryan race with light eyes, light hair

ManUNITEDglory

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
298
Reaction score
-1
According to UN the number of Rohingya women raped and gang-raped were massive, this is Mongol invasion of Central Asia all over again. Nearly half of the Rohingya female population were raped !!!!! The UN who interviewed the Rohingya victim claim 52% of all Rohingya refugees surveyed were raped. Other studies shows 1/3 of the Rohingya women were raped

Unlike Europe, Middle east, Central Asian and most of South Asia the regions of Arakan was never invaded nor conquered by Iranians, Kushans, Scythians, Turkic, Mongols. It was only Burmese conquered by Burmese Rakhine from 10th-15th century and later 18th century by Burmese/Bamar.

Indo-Aryan settlement in Arakan region could even dates back since 200 BC meaning the Rohingya are the purest examples of ancient South Asians having little to no admixture.

It is a South Asian Indic race with abundant of eye colors. The last pure race of Indo-Aryans may eventually genocide if India and Bangladesh sends them back to Burma. Why is India and Bangladesh supporting Burma ? sending back to Myammar for what ??? to be raped and killed again by the Burmese army?


dd7dc9d426a1bcd4b4978ca229906956--islam-peace.jpg

20130120152913_1_normal.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

3bf8412a-9389-11e7-b116-f4507ff9df92_1320x770_130531.jpg

160330083002-myanmar-rohingya-discrimination-watson-dnt-ns-00005115-large-169.jpg

stock-photo-rohingyan-girl-at-myanmar-this-picture-was-taken-during-the-battle-between-islam-and-buddhism-in-541546960.jpg

Rohingya-woman-in-camp.jpg

methode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2Ff50f202e-9321-11e7-8177-dcdb1e4e95ab.jpg

rohingyagirl.jpg

boy-with-cool-eyes.jpg

rohingya-camp-sittwe-myanmar.jpg

2015-Birmanie-Arakan-0606.jpg
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
retarded post. most south asians are what the white supremacists call "mongrels" or "mixed"

Wrong, South Asians DNA are the purest of all. Modern day Europeans are all mixture of many neolithic Caucasoids who were non-indo European, only their language and some of their ancestry was Indo-Europeans.

Also Indo-European speakers of middle east, europe, Central Asia have been invaded and conquered by Mongol, Turkic, Arabic, west Asian and mixed with them including Uralic people. They don't have pure genetic structure.

While you can say the same to South Asia who also experience a number of invasions/conquest by the Arabs, Scythians, Greeks, Iranians, Mughals, Turkic but because massive population it couldn't contaminate their population and contribution are little and retained their original physical appearance. The proof is in Arakan region of Rohingya where it was never invaded by many outside force in the last 5000 years history with exception of it's contact with Burmese and the people of their race who a ancient indigenous inhabitants of Arakan have kept their blood to their purest.
 
Last edited:
.
Wrong, South Asians DNA are the purest of all. Modern day Europeans are all mixture of many neolithic Caucasoids who were non-indo European, only their language and some of their ancestry was Indo-Europeans.

Also Indo-European speakers of middle east, europe, Central Asia have been invaded and conquered by Mongol, Turkic, Arabic, west Asian and mixed with them including Uralic people. They don't have pure genetic structure.

While you can say the same to South Asia who also experience a number of invasions/conquest by the Arabs, Scythians, Greeks, Iranians, Turkic but because massive population it couldn't contaminate their population and contribution are little and retained their original physical appearance. The proof is in Arakan region of Rohingya where it was never invaded by many outside force in the last 5000 years history with exception of it's contact with Burmese and the people of their race who a ancient indigenous inhabitants of Arakan have kept their blood to their purest.

Try not to be absurd. The original physical types remained intact when the Indo-Aryan language was brought in. The numbers of migrants were small.

Indo Aryan is a language group, not a race.

You seem to be stuck in the 19th century.
 
.
Try not to be absurd. The original physical types remained intact when the Indo-Aryan language was brought in. The numbers of migrants were small.

Indo Aryan is a language group, not a race.

You seem to be stuck in the 19th century.

What is so absurd ? A lot of idiots like to claim Indians with blue eyes, green eyes are either the result of Scythian, Indo-Sythian ancestry, Kushan ancestry, greek ancestry, Iranian, Sassanids ancestry that assimilated into India however their genetic contribution is very few to India. I mean I've seen idiots who claim bollywood actors with blue/green eyes as Scythian ancestry which is nonsense because the Rohingya have those eye colors and their region never invaded by any of those.

The Rohingya have blue/green eyes and were ancestral to ancient Arakan for many thousand years, they kept their pure racial bloodline in tact which is more evidence again that proves blue/green eyes had always been indigenous characteristic of south Asians.
 
Last edited:
.
:drag: The argument to save one based on color of eye , you lost me there however I understand their difficulty and hope that Bangadesh would reach out to Pakistan on a Diplomatic front to seek help
 
. . .
Rohingyas ARE Bengalis. Some of them have Mongoloid features because some of them married local Burmese girls and converted them to Islam. Those Mongoloid looking ones are their descendants.
 
.
Rohingyas ARE Bengalis. Some of them have Mongoloid features because some of them married local Burmese girls and converted them to Islam. Those Mongoloid looking ones are their descendants.

This is a lie, Rohingya are the purest Indo-Aryan groups there is. There is no evidence of them intermarrying with the Burmese or having Mongoloid features. Even if there was some mixing with the mongoloid the Rohingya phenotypes are clearly 100% Indo-Aryan which are clearly demonstrated in their phenotypes so there is not the slightest evidence of Mongoloid and it clearly didn't have the slightest effect on them as a overall race.

If there really is Mongoloid looking Rohingya is because the Japs army raped some Rohingya muslim girls including Indian muslim girls but from what I've seen so far none of them have Mongoloid faces.

" Imperial Japanese forces slaughtered, raped, and tortured Rohingya Muslims and Indian muslims. They expelled tens of thousands of Rohingya into Bengal in British India. The Japanese committed countless acts of rape, murder and torture against thousands of Rohingyas.[9] "

And history will repeat itself if South Asian races don't protect their own races from foreign invaders. This is exactly why India and Bangladesh is doing the wrong thing by not protecting their own races and are criticizing Rohingya as terrorist organisations. So what if Rohingya lives in India/Bangladesh as refugees? what you rather the pure Rohingya Indo-Aryan race women get raped and gang raped by Burmese army again ?



Kurdistan have been historically invaded by many different races from the Arabs, Mongols, Turkics, Romans, Greeks, Persians, Crusaders, Vikings.

There's no proof that those are pure Indo-Aryans.
 
Last edited:
.
This is a lie, Rohingya are the purest Indo-Aryan groups there is. There is no evidence of them intermarrying with the Burmese or having Mongoloid features. Even if there was mixing the Rohingya phenotypes are clearly 100% Indo-Aryan which are clearly demonstrated in their phenotypes.



Kurdistan have been historically invaded by many different races from the Arabs, Mongols, Turkics, Romans, Greeks, Persians, Crusaders, Vikings.

There's no proof that those pure are pure Indo-Aryans.

Keep telling that to yourself nobody is going believe. And another thing Burma is not going to give Arakan atleast not without a war.
 
Last edited:
.
It's already been proven that the Aryan invasion is a myth and there is no evidence of any genetic blending of people from Central Asia, Middle east, European with the people South Asia in last thousands of years. Rohingya have lived in Arakan properly even since 3000 BC and never experienced any other invasions like Europe, Central Asia Middle east ( which includes Kurdistan duh ), and South Asia however South Asia have the largest population of Indo-Aryans and invaders population were small compare with native and Rohingya are evidence of genetically untouched indo-aryans.

 
.
Back
Top Bottom