What's new

Gartner survey: 33% of companies are moving their supply chains out of China

striver44

BANNED
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
4,832
Reaction score
-16
Country
Indonesia
Location
Indonesia
Citing Covid-19 pandemic, rising tariffs, and Brexit, companies move their sourcing to Vietnam, India, and Mexico.
global-network-background-3228704_1920.jpg

June 24, 2020
DC Velocity Staff
No Comments
One third of companies with global supply chains have moved their sourcing and manufacturing activities out of China or plan to do so in the next two to three years, according to a recent survey from analyst firm Gartner Inc.

And while the Covid-19 pandemic is certainly one of the top reasons for the trend, other powerful factors are the U.K.’s economic withdrawal from the European Union, known as Brexit, and rising tariff costs incurred by President Trump’s trade war with China, the Stamford, Connecticut-based firm said. Gartner’s “Weathering the Supply Chain Storm” survey gathered data from 260 global respondents between February and March 2020. Participants were responsible for supply chain and related functions across a range of industries, including high-tech, industrial, and food & beverage.

While China itself doesn’t pay any money for tariffs imposed on its exports to other countries—such fees are collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) from domestic importers, who typically pass the cost on to consumers in the form of higher prices—the tariffs still make Chinese products more expensive to American buyers.

In reaction to those elevated prices, many companies have begun sourcing from alternative locations such as Vietnam, India, and Mexico, Gartner said. In addition to dodging the increased costs triggered by tariffs, moving business out of China also allows companies to make their supply chains more resilient, meaning that they have good visibility and the agility to shift sourcing, manufacturing, and distribution activities around quickly.

“Global supply chains were being disrupted long before Covid-19 emerged,” Kamala Raman, senior director analyst with the Gartner Supply Chain Practice, said in a release. “Already in 2018 and 2019, the U.S.-China trade war made supply chain leaders aware of the weaknesses of their globalized supply chains and question the logic of heavily outsourced, concentrated and interdependent networks. As a result, a new focus on network resilience and the idea of more regional manufacturing emerged.”

However, building a more resilient supply chain has a price. Fifty-eight percent of respondents told Gartner that more resilience also results in additional structural costs to the network. “We are at a crossroads in the evaluation of global supply chains that pits just-in-time systems designed to improve operational efficiency against just-in-case plans that emphasize planning and preparing for a range of plausible scenarios,” Raman said. “To find balance, supply chain leaders must engage in risk management to assess their organization’s willingness to take risk onboard and decide how to quantify that risk against other network objectives such as cost effectiveness.”

One way companies recapture that added cost is by leveraging their newly regionalized or localized supply chains to ease delays and shortages in times of disruption, since manufacturing now occurs closer to the source of demand, Gartner said.


https://www.dcvelocity.com/articles...s-are-moving-their-supply-chains-out-of-china
 
.
Good move by companies. with changes in hongkong, money will also move out.
:partay::partay::chilli::chilli::bunny::bunny:
 
.
Global industrial supply chain should never have been concentrated in one country to begin with, it created new jobs in just one country but eliminated so many jobs in the rest of the countries around the world.
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...in-latest-u-s-companies-buy-more-china-faster
Just as the U.S. president urges American companies to ditch China, many of them can’t get more of China fast enough.

LOL.
They can do all polls they want but that is easier to say than done, there is no place that offer all the characteristic that China offer in manufacturing,sorry to say but that is the true, if cheap labor was the only factor Mexico would have replaced China a decade ago, the only country the get close to have that capability is Vietnam a country with a very similar government but is too small to replace China.
The Chinese government is more urgent to cut the reliance of that model of cheap manufacturing than the Americans are to get their manufacturing back and the have done a good job, they cut it from 40% to 19%. But is very difficult to cut the reliance, they are not going to reject the German coffee maker company who wants to manufacture their latest product in China.
 
Last edited:
.
.
It is never about waiting & watching. It is always about what facilities are available & what policies are there to do business, businessmen are never patriot to a cause they are only patriot to money which is available in China & via China.
Companies suffered by 25% tariff ( Luxshare, TC, Lenovo, auto part for North America market etc ) already left CN ( to VN and other ASEAN nations ) do you know that ??

Companies thats still stay in CN bcs they dont suffer 25% tariff yet (like Apple ) or bcs they still can make money from CN market (like Foxconn.)

If US slap 25% tariff to all CN products, then Apple,Foxconn will also leave CN, only keep the sections that still can make money from CN market.
 
.
Companies suffered by 25% tariff ( Luxshare, TC, Lenovo, auto part for North America market etc ) already left CN ( to VN and other ASEAN nations ) do you know that ??

Companies thats still stay in CN bcs they dont suffer 25% tariff yet (like Apple ) or bcs they still can make money from CN market (like Foxconn.)

If US slap 25% tariff to all CN products, then Apple,Foxconn will also leave CN, only keep the sections that still can make money from CN market.
Look there is something you need to understated. Trade is never a one way channel. I have seen the USA China trade war. Who is the winner from it? According to you it is USA okay so what has USA won from it? More Jobs? According to USA the unemployment has gone up. So I fail to understand how has USA achieved any thing if the process of trade war is not bringing down the unemployment rate in UAS? My friend I read your comments all day but the major question is if companies are leaving actually why are they not translating into real jobs for Americans? There can be only 2 possibilities for that either this all is propaganda or USA business are closing up due to competition.
Look trade is a very complex matter there are things you & I will cause if we understood we would be CEO of some firm today with that knowledge so my friend we both lack understanding.
The issue is not economy but the issue is saving democracy. Countries in the world are shaking due to the calamities that happened in 2020. Our politicians need scapegoats to beat the drum and place blames to keep our own clothes clean. Look at the world around you humanity is in pieces cause of Covid19 Govt have failed to contain it & we are talking about moving companies out of China? where would those companies bring money to build new facilities in India or Vietnam? They will take loans who will give them loans? China and if China stops financing them the shit will hit the roof faster than you and I can imagine.
China is the worlds second biggest Global economy when people come up with stuff like this they have no knowledge of the world outside their home. China is not a bubble economy which will burst it is a manufacturing power. I really doubt any company will be foolish enough to move in global lock down. Companies are already struggling to find business and you are trying to tell me they are moving their production, How?
Please be a bit realistic
If I shut today and to lets say move to India I will not be able to complete any factory for at least next 5 years due to Covid19 and in that time my competitors will take the market from me
 
Last edited:
.
Look there is something you need to understated. Trade is never a one way channel. I have seen the USA China trade war. Who is the winner from it? According to you it is USA okay so what has USA won from it? More Jobs? According to USA the unemployment has gone up. So I fail to understand how has USA achieved any thing if the process of trade war is not bringing down the unemployment rate in UAS? My friend I read your comments all day but the major question is if companies are leaving actually why are they not translating into real jobs for Americans? There can be only 2 possibilities for that either this all is propaganda or USA business are closing up due to competition.
Look trade is a very complex matter there are things you & I will cause if we understood we would be CEO of some firm today with that knowledge so my friend we both lack understanding.
The issue is not economy but the issue is saving democracy. Countries in the world are shaking due to the calamities that happened in 2020. Our politicians need scapegoats to beat the drum and place blames to keep our own clothes clean. Look at the world around you humanity is in pieces cause of Covid19 Govt have failed to contain it & we are talking about moving companies out of China? where would those companies bring money to build new facilities in India or Vietnam? They will take loans who will give them loans? China and if China stops financing them the shit will hit the roof faster than you and I can imagine.
China is the worlds second biggest Global economy when people come up with stuff like this they have no knowledge of the world outside their home. China is not a bubble economy which will burst it is a manufacturing power. I really doubt any company will be foolish enough to move in global lock down. Companies are already struggling to find business and you are trying to tell me they are moving their production, How?
Please be a bit realistic
If I shut today and to lets say move to India I will not be able to complete any factory for at least next 5 years due to Covid19 and in that time my competitors will take the market from me
Tks for reading my comments everyday. Hope u realize that:

1. Capitalism is a failed system.
2. Trade war or TPP or whatever kind of war against CN will not bring economic benefit to US but...Vietnam, another communist nation cos labor cost in US is too high, US workers also wont accept to work 12 hours including Sunday like in CN,VN. Thats why Trump cancelled TPP.

But why US will continue the trade war/hot war against CN even when it only bring benefit to VN ?? Bcs if they do Nothing, they will fall like Karl Marx said abt capitalism and US will become communist nation, too. Which mean all properties of rich US will be nationalised.

So, US can not stop trade war cos the rich in US dont wanna lose everything like the rich in communist VN, CN. Bcs trade war will.keep escalating wt higher tariff to more "made in CN" products , so more companies will leave CN ( to VN and other ASEAN nations).

And u know who give infrastructure loan to VN ?? Yeah, thats Japan. Did u know who gave loan to CN in 1979 ?? Yeah.its JP, too.

So, infrastructure loan is not a big problem when the companies decide to leave CN due to trade war.If Apple, Foxconn decide to leave CN like Luxshare, TCL, Lenovo, then VN will offer good enough infrastructure and facilities for them cos we can borrow money from.JP. Thats not a big problems
 
Last edited:
.
Anti-China people can only look for confidence in so-called investigations. I remember that since 2008, there have been such investigations every year, but 10 years later, these companies have not yet withdrawn from China. The efficiency of these companies is too low:omghaha::omghaha:
 
.
Tks for reading my comments everyday. Hope u realize that:

1. Capitalism is a failed system.
2. Trade war or TPP or whatever kind of war against CN will not bring economic benefit to US but...Vietnam, another communist nation cos labor cost in US is too high, US workers also wont accept to work 12 hours including Sunday like in CN,VN. Thats why Trump cancelled TPP.

But why US will continue the trade war/hot war against CN even when it only bring benefit to VN ?? Bcs if they do Nothing, they will fall like Karl Marx said abt capitalism and US will become communist nation, too. Which mean all properties of rich US will be nationalised.

So, US can not stop trade war cos the rich in US dont wanna lose everything like in communist VN, CN. Bcs trade war will.keep escalating wt higher tariff to more "made in CN" products , so more companies will leave CN ( to VN and other ASEAN nations).

And u know who give infrastructure loan to VN ?? Yeah, thats Japan. Did u know who gave loan to CN in 1979 ?? Yeah.its JP, too.

So, infrastructure loan is not a big problem when the companies decide to leave CN due to trade war.If Apple, Foxconn decide to leave CN like Luxshare, TCL, Lenovo, then VN will offer good enough infrastructure and facilities for them cos we can borrow money from.JP. Thats not a big problems

My friend please understand companies are never trigger happy they wait for decisions to mature and then make moves. It is never a mathematical equation. Things happen slowly over time & many decisions are reverted & all the big boys know this. Business coming to Vietnam or any other country will have 1000s of other reasons behind it. For example I am a producer in China, if USA sanctions China I will never leave China but will take loans and built another factory in USA when dust settles I will asses where is my production vetter and will run that plant & shut rest. The companies who have multiple plants will do this.
 
.
It is never about waiting & watching. It is always about what facilities are available & what policies are there to do business, businessmen are never patriot to a cause they are only patriot to money which is available in China & via China.
Economy is not static it is a like a dynamite, never stays the same forever. If you are not quick enough you are out of business tomorrow.
Look, we just sign off FTA with EU. If you are a businessman wanting to do more business with EU, what would you do?

a) you stay put in your country with high tariffs and import restrictions.
b) you move to Vietnam.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom