What's new

Fusion Breakthrough: 150% energy return

Beny Karachun

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
6,512
Reaction score
-37
Country
Israel
Location
Israel


First time a Fusion reaction produced more energy than it consumed. This is deal breaking.
 


First time a Fusion reaction produced more energy than it consumed. This is deal breaking.
This is an older milestone that the NIF seems to republish every so many years to generate publicity to get more funding. It’s all eyewash.

This is not the first time it’s happened- happened about maybe a decade ago at the NIF. Here is BBC article from 2013 about the same https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24429621.amp

They use 500 MJ to get laser beam of 2 MJ that then creates 2.5 MJ. No one can point out the pathway to gain that will take us to the gain necessary to get net input energy gain.
 
This is an older milestone that the NIF seems to republish every so many years to generate publicity to get more funding. It’s all eyewash.

This is not the first time it’s happened- happened about maybe a decade ago at the NIF. They use 500 MJ to get laser beam of 2 MJ that then creates 2.5 MJ. No one can point out the pathway to gain that will take us to the gain necessary to get net input energy gain.
Wrong dude.
This is the first time energy gain was claimed to be achieved.
 
Wrong dude.
This is the first time energy gain was claimed to be achieved.
From 2013

Wrong dude.
This is the first time energy gain was claimed to be achieved.
If you want, we can descend into game of the difference between energy absorbed vs energy of the lasers vs net energy etc
 
From 2013


If you want, we can descend into game of the difference between energy absorbed vs energy of the lasers vs net energy etc
Well this isn't net energy gain, whereas now, it was achieved.
 
It’s eyewash bro. Define net energy gain.
Hmmm... I think you're right after reading it again, however, there has to be a difference between what happened today and what happened in 2013, what is it?
 
Hmmm... I think you're right after reading it again, however, there has to be a difference between what happened today and what happened in 2013, what is it?
Energy input defined differently.
Energy absorbed by pellet (2013)
Total Energy in laser (now)
 
Back
Top Bottom