What's new

FRAUD: Why the India-Middleast-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is a Total Fraud?

Asian.Century

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
10,754
Reaction score
-2
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
FRAUD: Why the India-Middleast-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is a Total Fraud?



Will China-Pakistan-Iran-Turkey-Iraq-Syria & Central Asian Republics BRI and the Pak-China CPEC checkmated/By-Passed now from the region ?
 
FRAUD: Why the India-Middleast-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is a Total Fraud?



Will China-Pakistan-Iran-Turkey-Iraq-Syria & Central Asian Republics BRI and the Pak-China CPEC checkmated/By-Passed now from the region ?
This video seems quite disingenuous. The real overriding question is will IMEC be a profitable trade route in and of itself.
- The only calculation the speaker offers is what would it take to totally replace the 16 IMAX container ships that use the Suez daily. IMEC is not there to replace the Suez but to offer an alternative route for goods that makes sense to ship faster. IMEC does not need to replace the entire volume of the Suez route, it just needs to be profitable for the goods it does carry.
- The speaker mentions the costs of container handling and the upkeep of the ports and railways. He however doesn't mention the $600,000 -$700,000 in various fees each of those large container ships has to pay for the honour of transiting the Suez Canal (plus operating costs of course).
- Most articles on the IMEC state that it will be 40% faster and, crucially, some also say 30% cheaper than the Suez route. I don't know if this is grounded in reality but someone like the speaker needs to address this directly with his own model/calculations showing why exactly it is or is not a reasonable hypothesis. Otherwise he is merely avoiding the real question.
- The speaker then goes on to extol the BRI at some length which is understandable if he is from the BRI institute. China itself says that it's neutral on the subject and has no problem with the IMEC. That the BRI will stand on its own merits and the IMEC if viable will be part of the general increase in the flow of trade. This speaker however seems out to merely belittle the IMEC concept, without bringing any real financial analysis despite the resources he has to do so, as if he was worried about the competition.

In summary, the IMEC will or will not be an economical alternative trade corridor in and of itself. This video does not seem to be useful to those trying to guage this viability.
 
The speaker is from the Belt and Road Institute. What else is he going to say ?

Clear relevant points made. it has no basis by-passing Pakistan-Iran-Turkey etc. Can never happen, have u watched video?

Also Middle east word should not be used, it is West Asia, for Arab Countries in Asia use term " WEST ASIA" from now-on.

Belt and Road institute thinks Belt and Road is the viable route and IMEC is not.
I am surprised , so so surprised that Belt and Road Institute thinks Belt and Road route works and IMEC will fail

The reason its a failure is because, look at the billion of dollars of investments required before hand. It's not like you in one meeting say IMEC is reaping rewards, it took CPEC , B&R route 10 plus years to materialize making billion and billions of investment, who is ready to that and what actual benefits these countries will get which they are not getting through already defined routes.
 
FRAUD: Why the India-Middleast-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is a Total Fraud?



Will China-Pakistan-Iran-Turkey-Iraq-Syria & Central Asian Republics BRI and the Pak-China CPEC checkmated/By-Passed now from the region ?

Pakistan-Iran-Turkey was/is a viable route. You need to setup a viable tollway with security to get going

Pakistan lack of progress ruined this organization
 
Clear relevant points made. it has no basis by-passing Pakistan-Iran-Turkey etc. Can never happen, have u watched video?

Also Middle east word should not be used, it is West Asia, for Arab Countries in Asia use term " WEST ASIA" from now-on.



The reason its a failure is because, look at the billion of dollars of investments required before hand. It's not like you in one meeting say IMEC is reaping rewards, it took CPEC , B&R route 10 plus years to materialize making billion and billions of investment, who is ready to that and what actual benefits these countries will get which they are not getting through already defined routes.

Not holding out high hopes.

Asking Indians to spend money on large infra is like asking donkey's to poop gold.

Not happening.

Out of the $40 Billion invested by China in Bangladesh for belt-and-road - all Indians could do to compete is whine and complain.

Bharat Mahaan !!
 
Not holding out high hopes.

Asking Indians to spend money on large infra is like asking donkey's to poop gold.

Not happening.

Out of the $40 Billion invested by China in Bangladesh for belt-and-road - all Indians could do to compete is whine and complain.

Bharat Mahaan !!

$40 billion - Quit farting. You do not have $40 billion to repay the Chinese

Money for project paid by Bangladeshi taxpayer is not a Chinese investment
 
The reason its a failure is because, look at the billion of dollars of investments required before hand. It's not like you in one meeting say IMEC is reaping rewards, it took CPEC , B&R route 10 plus years to materialize making billion and billions of investment, who is ready to that and what actual benefits these countries will get which they are not getting through already defined routes.

That's one of the beautiful things about the IMEC. Most of the infrastructure already exists. It's just a question of linking them up - mainly a rail and pipeline from KSA to Jordan. And the Saudis and Emiratis are happy to pay for that.

Not holding out high hopes.

Asking Indians to spend money on large infra is like asking donkey's to poop gold.

Not happening.

Out of the $40 Billion invested by China in Bangladesh for belt-and-road - all Indians could do to compete is whine and complain.

Bharat Mahaan !!

That's the beautiful thing this deal is for the Indians. They basically do not have to spend anything. (Well upgrading some ports to handle more volume but Adani will gladly handle that).

No the ones that are spending tens of billions to link up already existing infrastructure are the Saudis and the Emiraties.

So if the IMEC is viable and indeed saves time and money for certain goods compared to other routes like the Suez then India will use it to boost trade greatly. And if it doesn't work then the Indians won't use it and have not lost anything.

From the Indians point of view there is no downside, just upside!
 
Last edited:
Asking Indians to spend money on large infra is like asking donkey's to poop gold.


Shouldn't your nation be more focused on returning our $7.4 billion dollars before barking out in international forums?
 

IMEC unlikely to help float India’s boat​

India has a historical pattern of involvement in regional affairs, often aimed at countering Pakistan, directly or indirectly, regardless of past failures at doing the job. One focal point of India’s opposition has been CPEC, which has faced criticism and propaganda since its inception. India has labelled CPEC as “unwarranted and preposterous” and claimed that parts of the project are on Indian territory. CPEC has served as a convenient target for India to criticise Pakistan.

India has now taken a strategic approach to counter CPEC, as evidenced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent announcement of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). This initiative involves India, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, the European Union, France, Italy, Germany and the US.

Critics argue that India’s new corridor lacks logical justification. India opting for a rail and shipping corridor when the existing and cheaper Suez Canal and maritime routes are available does not make sense. Secondly, building railways through desert terrain requires elevated tracks with deep support to withstand shifting sands and hard bedrock.

The political landscape in the US adds another layer of uncertainty, as opposition to investment in this corridor could increase if the Biden administration loses power. The Republicans, on the other hand, would oppose putting money into a failing project just like they did not want to put money into the Ukraine war. On the other hand, the US and India have previously announced initiatives like the Chabahar Corridor, the International North-South Corridor and the US Blue Dot Network, but the status of these projects remains uncertain.

Building a network of railways, roads and ports spanning multiple countries requires meticulous coordination and planning. Moreover, IMEC passes through Jordan and Israel, introducing complex geopolitical challenges that demand a delicate blend of economic and diplomatic manoeuvring. Even Türkiye, a key regional player, has expressed dissatisfaction with the project. President Tayyip Erdogan pushed back against plans by India, Saudi Arabia and the EU to create a trade corridor that would bypass Turkey.

In contrast, China’s BRI, launched in 2013, has made significant progress, signing cooperation agreements with over 150 countries and numerous international organisations. It has mobilised substantial investments and initiated thousands of projects, amounting to nearly $1 trillion in funding and over 3,000 projects. Moreover, CPEC stands out in this regard, having already generated over 80,000 jobs, and is poised to create even more employment opportunities as the project reaches completion. Furthermore, CPEC offers a valuable opportunity for numerous countries, particularly those in Central and South Asia, to benefit from this trade route. This, in turn, promises a substantial boost to the Pakistani economy. Another noteworthy aspect that dispels the ‘debt trap’ narrative is the proportion of CPEC investment relative to Pakistan’s overall debt. With CPEC accounting for just 5.6% of Pakistan’s debt, India’s claims of CPEC being a debt trap are unfounded and significantly misrepresent the reality.

Even if the countries involved manage to overcome internal infrastructural challenges and secure financing for the IMEC project, there remains a significant obstacle in the form of the Western world’s ideological approach to maintaining economic dominance over the Global South. This mindset creates a barrier to the IMEC’s success. The idea that the US could employ coercive tactics to compel nations to purchase from expensive Western companies exclusively is not a viable solution.

In the current geopolitical landscape, we are experiencing a shift towards a multipolar world. Indications like the Saudi-Iran rapprochement, the expansion of BRICS and positive regional relations with Russia and China demonstrate that the Middle East is inclined towards maintaining trade relations with multiple partners rather than taking sides. Instead, the West and India must focus on being competitive in the global market to thrive in this evolving multipolar environment.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 4th, 2023.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom