StormShadow
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 3,485
- Reaction score
- -10
What makes you think only Col.Purohit can be "unestablished person/group who did not have access to sufficient amount of explosives"...there can be other parties in Pak as well. Col.Purohit doesnot become a culprit by default even by your logic.It has to be an unestablished person/group who did not have access to sufficient amount of explosives.
Same concrete evidence is lagging in Col.Purohit's case as well!!India and US are welcome to believe what they want to but unless they can come up with some concrete evidence, I remain unimpressed.
Secondly, I would like a source for that piece you posted.
And my source is wiki.