What's new

First kashmiri women to win Mrs India title

Perhaps the "Mrs" didn't feel it was a fair competition to be in the same event as the "misses" after pushing out 3 children out, not to mention the obvious "sagging" thanks to literally sucking the teat dry.



I suppose you missed the other 3 tenets of this competition. You know, the ones NOT highlighted by you?
like I said. You guys are becoming far too predictable with your comments.
That implies that Mrs do not exist with well toned bodies in the subcontinent.

The competition put that tenet first, not me and hence judgement of these women as sexual objects was and is part of it. Which means that regardless of whether they launched the ISRO mission to mars, their bosom matters.
 
.
.
That implies that Mrs do not exist with well toned bodies in the subcontinent.

And this would imply that the female body does not suffer through massive physical changes post birth, let alone 3 childbirths.
Of course you prove me wrong by showing me a woman who hasn't gone through this transformation. (au naturale, not plastic surgery Kardashians please)
I suppose there is no concept of a level playing field to you?

And exactly why "beauty" isn't the only parameter in this event. Not saying pregnant women or mothers aren't beautiful, but it does take a toll on the female body.

The competition put that tenet first, not me and hence judgement of these women as sexual objects was and is part of it. Which means that regardless of whether they launched the ISRO mission to mars, their bosom matters.

Now isn't that a generous interpretation of your own ideas? You're clearly projecting.
I suppose your issue lies with the order of the tenets of this competition. But unless you know what parameters these women were judged on, ie. What qualities were given importance, its pure speculation on your part.

Add to that the mere fact that you on your own admission claim that this woman was not a "MILF", indicates that the "beauty" was secondary and other parameters played more of a influence in her win. So why all the confusion?

How are the two related?

Only such that its her word against yours.
You seem to have an issue with her calling herself Indian while being from Kulgam, Kashmir.
I suppose you should take up the issue and protest outside her house...
Oh wait...for that you would need an Indian Passport or an Indian visa to visit Kashmir. You know, coz Kashmir isn't part of India. lol
Now I thoroughly concede.
 
. . . . .
And this would imply that the female body does not suffer through massive physical changes post birth, let alone 3 childbirths.
Of course you prove me wrong by showing me a woman who hasn't gone through this transformation. (au naturale, not plastic surgery Kardashians please)
I suppose there is no concept of a level playing field to you?

And exactly why "beauty" isn't the only parameter in this event. Not saying pregnant women or mothers aren't beautiful, but it does take a toll on the female body.



Now isn't that a generous interpretation of your own ideas? You're clearly projecting.
I suppose your issue lies with the order of the tenets of this competition. But unless you know what parameters these women were judged on, ie. What qualities were given importance, its pure speculation on your part.

Add to that the mere fact that you on your own admission claim that this woman was not a "MILF", indicates that the "beauty" was secondary and other parameters played more of a influence in her win. So why all the confusion?



Only such that its her word against yours.
You seem to have an issue with her calling herself Indian while being from Kulgam, Kashmir.
I suppose you should take up the issue and protest outside her house...
Oh wait...for that you would need an Indian Passport or an Indian visa to visit Kashmir. You know, coz Kashmir isn't part of India. lol
Now I thoroughly concede.
The female body is designed to retake shape and the massive changes are recouped via proper physical fitness.
Its common in the west and now happening in the east as well.

As for the beauty part, if it was not to be used then why put the term. The contest itself uses the term and hence it is a factor. Wherher I project or not is irrelevant since the premise of the competition includes it and therefore is always going to be a factor.

Which then brings the winner’s qualification in question as well since it seems to be motivated by her status from a disputed and neglected region and not just because she went through abuse; since the traditional concepts of beauty that were applied to previous winners do not seem to factor in for her.
 
. . . . .
The female body is designed to retake shape and the massive changes are recouped via proper physical fitness.
Its common in the west and now happening in the east as well.

As for the beauty part, if it was not to be used then why put the term. The contest itself uses the term and hence it is a factor. Wherher I project or not is irrelevant since the premise of the competition includes it and therefore is always going to be a factor.

Which then brings the winner’s qualification in question as well since it seems to be motivated by her status from a disputed and neglected region and not just because she went through abuse; since the traditional concepts of beauty that were applied to previous winners do not seem to factor in for her.

Height of speculation!
Lets settle this once and for all using the criteria set by the event itself. Remember, before you throw this out as being "aspirational" rather than "practical", do note you yourself use the below from the same to build your argument.
Mrs India - Queen of Substance holds an annual pageant in two different categeories to identify Married Indian Women who exemplify Beauty, Talent, Intelligence & Compassion.”

Heres what the website states as their goal in choosing a Mrs. India:

While most pageants focus only on looks, Mrs. India stands apart by celebrating the confidence, attitude and achievements of a married woman. The Mrs India Finalists actively took part to help and support various social causes like women empowerment, education, environmental issues, mental health and more as part of the selection process.

I believe this should settle any doubt about this event's focus on "objectifying women" or your claim that Mrs. Parveen won to showcase her as a representative of India from the "disputed" region of Kashmir
 
. . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom