What's new

FBI translator fled to Syria to marry Islamic State leader

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
FBI translator fled to Syria to marry Islamic State leader
By News Desk
Published: May 2, 2017
2SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1399086-investigatesfbisyriacuspertabutalhaalalmanijpgsuper-1493721884-444-640x480.jpg

German-rapper turned IS leader, Denis Cuspert. PHOTO: CNN

A former FBI translator with national security clearance fled to Syria under false pretenses to marry an IS militant, CNN reported on Monday.

Daniela Greene was hired by the FBI in 2011 as a contract linguistic, she was moved to the Detroit office in 2014 to work “in investigative capacity” on the case of a German militant referred to as ‘Individual A’ – who the broadcaster identifies as her husband Denis Cuspert aka Abu Talha al-Almani.

In a video released in April 2014, Cuspert can be seen declaring allegiance to IS leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi. A German-rapper turned IS leader, Cuspert praised Osama bin Laden, threatened former US President Barack Obama and held a severed head in a video. His recruitment tactics in the virtual world had brought him on the US and Europe intelligence departments’ radar.

Australia man arrested on charges of helping Islamic State develop missile technology

During investigation, Greene outlined social media accounts used by the IS leader but kept access to one Skype account to herself. The same year she informed the bureau of her travelling plans to Europe to visit her family, but the FBI agent left the country on a one-way ticket to Istanbul. She then travelled to the city of Gaziantep – from where Cuspert is believed to have helped her cross the border. The couple then got married.

It took two months for her to realise things were amiss. “I was weak and didn’t know how to handle anything anymore,” she wrote in an email to an unidentified person on July 8. “I really made a mess of things this time.”

Five weeks after she left, the United States issued an order for her arrest. She was arrested upon return in August 2014 after she managed to escape the war-torn country.

The newspaper found federal court records – with court ordered redacts – where US prosecutors termed Greene’s behaviour as “egregious” deserving of “severe punishment”, with the US Attorney Thomas Gollice adding that she had “violated the public trust, the trust of the officials who granted her security clearance, and the trust of those with whom she worked and, in doing so, endangered our nation’s security.”

Despite noting that Greene’s “conduct skirted a line dangerously close to other more serious charges,” the prosecutors at the Justice Department seem to have been lenient as they charged her with a minor offence and asked for a reduced sentence as well. According to an analysis by the Centre on National Security at Fordham University, dozens of Americans arrested for IS related offences have been given, at an average, 13 and a half years prison sentences.

Islamic State planning attacks in Britain, says watchdog

When approached by the news site, a Justice Department official said the verdict was “in line” with similar cases without elaborating on any. The prosecutors also asked the judge to seal Greene’s identity after she agreed to full cooperation. “Unsealing these documents will allow appropriate public access to and knowledge of the circumstances of this case,” the official said.

Upon inquiry by CNN, the FBI replied with a statement saying it “took several steps in a variety of areas to identify and reduce security vulnerabilities. The FBI continues to strengthen protective measures in carrying out its vital work.” However the agency did not comment on what those steps were.

While Greene refused to divulge any details to the newspaper saying if she talked “my family will be in danger”, her attorney, Shawn Moore said his client was “smart, articulate and obviously naïve”. “She was just a well-meaning person that got up in something way over her head,” Moore said

“It’s a stunning embarrassment for the FBI, no doubt about it,” said a former State Department official, John Kirby, emphasising that Greene couldn’t have entered Syria without the top IS leaders’ approval.

Kirby, who is a now a correspondent on national security for CNN, said outsiders risk “getting their heads cut off” so “for her to able to get in as an American, as a woman, as an FBI employee, and to be able to take up residence with a known ISIS leader, that all had to be coordinated.”

Cuspert was believed to have been killed in an airstrike in Raqqah in October 2015 by the Pentagon until August 2016, when they issued a statement claiming he was alive. “It now appears that assessment was incorrect and Denis Cuspert survived the airstrike,” the press release said. A day later, Greene was released from federal prison.
 
.
So it looks like they released her from jail last August and she's not talking to the press. She's a waitress in a hotel restaurant now.

What's with all these European girls (she is Czech) running off to ISIS?
 
Last edited:
.
Can't say she was catfished - she was a translator and worked for FBI
 
. .
More trouble as expected and an embarrassing one at that. The more you meddle in the affairs of other nations the dirtier you'll get.
 
.
Can't say she was catfished - she was a translator and worked for FBI

She was mostly unstable... who passed the "failed" FBI personality test...
SHe wasn't the first neither the last... It happen a lot in cartel investigations/Fascist groups etc... Whatever it's man or woman...

It's like I ask you what could happen if you are lost in an island with a man you hate or dislike? Can you be sure nothing can happen btw you two... in the long run...
 
.
So it looks like they released her from jail last August and she's not talking to the press. She's a waitress in a hotel restaurant now.

What's with all these European girls (she is Czech) running off to ISIS?

Story doesn't add up in general. Nobody can just decide to go to Syria through Turkish border whenever they want post 2013. She was approved by the FBI or CIA or whomever takes command for this stuff. There must be many informants there, most whom are Muslim, guiding the activities of this group. To say the least it is heavily infiltrated. This does not look well for any foreign intelligence agencies, if they are taking part in partial command of Daesh, to try swaying them a certain way. It also tells that there is no interest to defeat them. It shouldn't take more than a few months.
 
.
So it looks like they released her from jail last August and she's not talking to the press. She's a waitress in a hotel restaurant now.

What's with all these European girls (she is Czech) running off to ISIS?

Is very easy to manipulate a person, be that man or woman, but woman are somehow easier to manipulate if you know how.

These people was groomed (Yes, the same term used in Pedophiliaism) and to an extend, they will do anything just to be on the other side, what you only need to do is for you to know what she need, and you give it to her. Praise, an ear to listen, a shoulder to cry on.

Eastern European (or country from the former eastern bloc) is in particularly easy to control, due to the way life's are over there and the history of a person, and his or her country.

So yes, even tho we all know ISIS is bad but they still dove head long into it, most likely because they were blinded to the fact, and they don't want to believe, most will leave after they have witness something traumatic but once the slave mentality set in, you will simply become part of it.
 
.
Is very easy to manipulate a person, be that man or woman, but woman are somehow easier to manipulate if you know how.

These people was groomed (Yes, the same term used in Pedophiliaism) and to an extend, they will do anything just to be on the other side, what you only need to do is for you to know what she need, and you give it to her. Praise, an ear to listen, a shoulder to cry on.

Eastern European (or country from the former eastern bloc) is in particularly easy to control, due to the way life's are over there and the history of a person, and his or her country.

So yes, even tho we all know ISIS is bad but they still dove head long into it, most likely because they were blinded to the fact, and they don't want to believe, most will leave after they have witness something traumatic but once the slave mentality set in, you will simply become part of it.

MAn and woman are both the same in term of manipulation. it's just the way to enter in it that is slighty different. Woman are more keen to fall in the emotional spectrum while man in the recognition/gratitude spectrum. The majority of ISIS soldiers per exemple are fallen into a form of manipulation too , by joining a group in hope to give a meaning to their life.

And so on...
 
.
Story doesn't add up in general. Nobody can just decide to go to Syria through Turkish border whenever they want post 2013. She was approved by the FBI or CIA or whomever takes command for this stuff. There must be many informants there, most whom are Muslim, guiding the activities of this group. To say the least it is heavily infiltrated. This does not look well for any foreign intelligence agencies, if they are taking part in partial command of Daesh, to try swaying them a certain way. It also tells that there is no interest to defeat them. It shouldn't take more than a few months.

It takes 5 weeks from she actually left for Syria to her arrest warrant. Which mean it took about 2 to 3 weeks for her boss to realise something is amiss. Bureaucratic at best would take about 2 weeks to gather information to get an arrest warrant.

In 2 or 3 weeks time, if she have an intention to fool the Bureau from the start, she would have a least 2 to 3 days head start, that's not enough to catch her even if you have intel on it. If she take longer and the indication is there for longer time, the Bureau can have enough time to arrange for an interception.

It was not just a few phone call from a FBI field office in the States to have someone detained overseas, it take a lot of effort to do so.
 
.
Story doesn't add up in general. Nobody can just decide to go to Syria through Turkish border whenever they want post 2013. She was approved by the FBI or CIA or whomever takes command for this stuff. There must be many informants there, most whom are Muslim, guiding the activities of this group. To say the least it is heavily infiltrated. This does not look well for any foreign intelligence agencies, if they are taking part in partial command of Daesh, to try swaying them a certain way. It also tells that there is no interest to defeat them. It shouldn't take more than a few months.

It also explains how ISIS has managed to control such vast swathes of land for so long in the first place. This is a formidable enemy judging by its history and ferocity. It has taken entire armies and coalitions to challenge ISIS and we are still where we are. This incredible screw up doesn't surprise me, but there must be something more than meets the eye as you rightfully point out. Some vital pieces that are not being revealed.
 
Last edited:
.
It takes 5 weeks from she actually left for Syria to her arrest warrant. Which mean it took about 2 to 3 weeks for her boss to realise something is amiss. Bureaucratic at best would take about 2 weeks to gather information to get an arrest warrant.

In 2 or 3 weeks time, if she have an intention to fool the Bureau from the start, she would have a least 2 to 3 days head start, that's not enough to catch her even if you have intel on it. If she take longer and the indication is there for longer time, the Bureau can have enough time to arrange for an interception.

It was not just a few phone call from a FBI field office in the States to have someone detained overseas, it take a lot of effort to do so.

My point is nobody can take vacations to Syria, especially at that time. Just your travel destination being Turkey is enough to cause suspicion/questioning at the airports. Let alone actually crossing the border into Syria, will get you caught by Turkish authorities. But I agree with what you're saying, they couldn't have prevented it if they expected something else from a trip to Turkey. Nevertheless, I am sure there is active intelligence agencies all over Syria from all countries in both regime held areas and rebel held ones.

It also explains how ISIS has managed to control such vast swathes of land for so long in the first place. This is a formidable enemy looking at its history and endurance.

I disagree, the organization is given too much credit. They exploited a civil war, and a thinly spread Syrian army. As for Iraq, we already know some scandal occurred in Mosul allowing them to take it over. The Syrian rebels probably can overcome ISIS but they are frustrated as they seek to focus on Assad and his gov't., but also some powers want to keep ISIS in power in the East of Syria because anytime they could intervene and take control of that territory to counter any side gaining momentum.
 
.
My point is nobody can take vacations to Syria, especially at that time. Just your travel destination being Turkey is enough to cause suspicion/questioning at the airports. Let alone actually crossing the border into Syria, will get you caught by Turkish authorities. But I agree with what you're saying, they couldn't have prevented it if they expected something else from a trip to Turkey. Nevertheless, I am sure there is active intelligence agencies all over Syria from all countries in both regime held areas and rebel held ones.



I disagree, the organization is given too much credit. They exploited a civil war, and a thinly spread Syrian army. As for Iraq, we already know some scandal occurred in Mosul allowing them to take it over. The Syrian rebels probably can overcome ISIS but they are frustrated as they seek to focus on Assad and his gov't., but also some powers want to keep ISIS in power in the East of Syria because anytime they could intervene and take control of that territory to counter any side gaining momentum.

Let's leave ISIS aside for a moment. These so-called coalitions with all their might and firepower are struggling in conflicts against other foes. Outfits I would grade significantly less than ISIS. Decades have gone by, but various terror outfits spread over certain war zones are practically in control today. How is this even conceivable?

I agree with ISIS receiving support, but is that support adequate to warrant confrontation against entire coalitions including the biggest military power, namely the US? I'm not even factoring the sustaining part which is a great mystery in itself. I don't buy it and it really is something to ponder upon.
 
Last edited:
.
It's not easy to root out insurgencies when you take civilian casualties into account. This is why even significantly more powerful countries elsewhere are struggling to end insurgencies. It's not hard to understand it unless you live in a Call of Duty universe.
 
.
Let's leave ISIS aside for a moment. These so-called coalitions with all their might and firepower are struggling in conflicts against other foes. Outfits I would grade significantly less than ISIS. Decades have gone by, but various terror outfits spread over certain war zones are practically in control today. How is this even conceivable?

I agree with ISIS receiving support, but is that support adequate to warrant confrontation against entire coalitions including the biggest military power, namely the US? I'm not even factoring the sustaining part which is a great mystery in itself. I don't buy it and it really is something to ponder upon.

I agree, how are they sustaining themselves is a mystery. It can't be from collecting taxes, the people there have mostly fled, especially the wealthy. All that remains are somewhat poorer people. That's just the financial aspect let alone military. Weapons depots captured are nowhere enough to supply their activities. They are somehow getting access to cash and weapons, and raw material for creating explosives, they seem to never run out. Which is why I'm suspicious and don't take these stories in the media seriously.

US Coalition is not using much force either. Look up any combat footage online, you will see use of aerial power is minimal.

It's not easy to root out insurgencies when you take civilian casualties into account. This is why even significantly more powerful countries elsewhere are struggling to end insurgencies. It's not hard to understand it unless you live in a Call of Duty universe.

It's hard to stop terrorism, but insurgency can be ended if you dedicate the right amount of resources. That's not the point though. The point is how IS is sustaining itself, it should be crumbling from within rather quickly. It is not, so it has to have some supply line of cash, raw material and weapons. Question remains who and where. Syrian rebel groups on other hand, have material support from some nations, so it makes sense why Assad is having more difficulty with them.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom