Exclusive: Strike Corps "capable of invasion and capture" of Tibet

[third eye]

Need I say more?

Yes you do.

India's stand has always been that the Mc mohan line is the border.

A few lines in a book do not reflect the national policy of a nation.

The Ramayan also talks of Lanka - should we annex nations based on mythology ?

 

[Shinigami]

maybe chunks of tibet, if the operation is planned properly. but "heart of tibet"? no chance. china is too big and too strong

By the way OP is a suspected false flagger

 

[Enemy]

Yes you do.

India's stand has always been that the Mc mohan line is the border.

A few lines in a book do not reflect the national policy of a nation.

National policy is determined by people in power. A brigadier in IA saying something is not a joke and cannot be unmatched to national policy whatsoever.

It will take a day in the parliament to derecognize the McMohan Line and annex Tibet just like Sikkim and Goa. Everything is subject to change under various circumstances.

 

[third eye]

maybe chunks of tibet, if the operation is planned properly. but "heart of tibet"? no chance. china is too big and too strong

By the way OP is a suspected false flagger

Chunks ?.. which chunks & why ? Can you hold them . Is it worth it ? Retaliation & at what cost ?

Stop thinking like the Pakistanis did when they tried to take ' chunks' in Kargil.

 

[Enemy]

maybe chunks of tibet, if the operation is planned properly. but "heart of tibet"? no chance. china is too big and too strong

By the way OP is a suspected false flagger

Do you know how far is the Lhasa from India?

By the way, as ancient Tibetan scriptures suggest the earlier capital of Tibet was in Kamrup (Assam) which is already an Indian territory.

 

[third eye]

National policy is determined by people in power. A brigadier in IA saying something is not a joke and cannot be unmatched to national policy whatsoever.

It will take a day in the parliament to derecognize the McMohan Line and annex Tibet just like Sikkim and Goa. Everything is subject to change under various circumstances.

Howsoever silly & stupid we think them to be luckily the parliamentarians are not so stupid.

 

[northeast]

Do you know how far is the Lhasa from India?

By the way, as ancient Tibetan scriptures suggest the earlier capital of Tibet was in Kamrup (Assam) which is already an Indian territory.

I only remember that tibetans had invaded india centuries ago，not vice versa.indian are good at talk,but too coward to put it into practice.

 

[Enemy]

Howsoever silly & stupid we think them to be luckily the parliamentarians are not so stupid.

They don't need to be. They will do what the Army asks them to do. This is how things are bro, not like how you think, sorry.

 

[asad71]

1. India will never ever have the ba--s to cause any threat to China which is a thermonuclear nation. Even all the urgings of USA will not infuse enough courage to India to mess with China. Then why is this build up? A nation with the highest concentration of the abject poor in the world should rather spend on poverty alleviation.The main incentive here is graft through arms purchase. After ages of trying and failing to produce anything lethal locally, India is now doing most of her purchases overseas. Makes it convenient to transfer funds into Swiss banks.



2. A time will come when people will ask why are we spending so much on this massive mily with most modern weapons. It's a waste of money. These guys are doing nothing sitting in cantonments. The political leadership, to justify maintaining this huge force, will look for employing them somewhere. In the neighborhood India is too scared of nuclear Pakistan to attack her. An assault on SL will be unpopular in India itself. Nepal borders Tibet which houses a huge contingent of PLA. That leaves BD. It's a Muslim nation. It is a hurdle for India's NE military ops.



3. So we, BD, must keep an eye on this build up which could eventually be launched on us.

 

[Enemy]

I only remember that tibetans had invaded india centuries ago，not vice versa.indian are good at talk,but too coward to put it into practice.

Go ask your Tibetans, what was the former Tibetan capital? And where it is now?

BTW, can you recognize who the female captives and where they were?

 

[A1Kaid]

Annexing Tibet is infeasible. Indian military is incapable of conquering and holding Tibet, let alone defending its own brder states and territories from PLA. Attempting to do so will widen the theater of war and PLA may very well wage full scale war especially if one of its largest provinces are invaded by Indian military as some here are trying to suggest.

Unlike others, this news report alone reflects the ground reality. Of course, those who try to draw a rosy picture will be disappointed.



Longer campaign is what India needs right now. India does not eye Aksai Chin, entire Tibet is the target, not so long ago the Indian army officially put a signboard long ago which says "Lhasa, Beijing, we will be there."

Only dumb people failed to get the message.

India cannot militarily nor financially afford a long campaign war against China nor could India survive a long campaign war with China. Indian military may be able to make short term gains in such a conflict but in long term will capitulate and face a major defeat.

 

[Shinigami]

I only remember that tibetans had invaded india centuries ago，not vice versa.indian are good at talk,but too coward to put it into practice.

what you smokin Bubba?

Chunks ?.. which chunks & why ? Can you hold them . Is it worth it ? Retaliation & at what cost ?

Stop thinking like the Pakistanis did when they tried to take ' chunks' in Kargil.

this is in case of a full fledge war. i am not saying we start the crisis by annexing territory.

and yes. its very possible for india to capture and hold on to large chunks of tibet due to the following:
1. Will of the people: Tibetans will be pro india and anti china. same situation as 71 which will give us a seizable advantage.
2. Terrain: As mentioned in the article, the chinese supplies pass through numerous choke points which can be destroyed by the IAF. This essentially negates the considerable advantages china has over us in terms of manpower and industry

1. India will never ever have the ba--s to cause any threat to China which is a thermonuclear nation. Even all the urgings of USA will not infuse enough courage to India to mess with China. Then why is this build up? A nation with the highest concentration of the abject poor in the world should rather spend on poverty alleviation.The main incentive here is graft through arms purchase. After ages of trying and failing to produce anything lethal locally, India is now doing most of her purchases overseas. Makes it convenient to transfer funds into Swiss banks.



2. A time will come when people will ask why are we spending so much on this massive mily with most modern weapons. It's a waste of money. These guys are doing nothing sitting in cantonments. The political leadership, to justify maintaining this huge force, will look for employing them somewhere. In the neighborhood India is too scared of nuclear Pakistan to attack her. An assault on SL will be unpopular in India itself. Nepal borders Tibet which houses a huge contingent of PLA. That leaves BD. It's a Muslim nation. It is a hurdle for India's NE military ops.



3. So we, BD, must keep an eye on this build up which could eventually be launched on us.

PDF Prfessinal

 

[northeast]

Go ask your Tibetans, what was the former Tibetan capital? And where it is now?

BTW, can you recognize who the female captives and where they were?

Oh,Glorious Indian slave army.I do agree that Britishers should conquere India again and bring it to a new height.

 

[Shinigami]

India cannot militarily nor financially afford a long campaign war against China nor could India survive a long campaign war with China. Indian military may be able to make short term gains in such a conflict but in long term will capitulate and face a major defeat.

if war was just about numbers and statistics, i would agree with you

 

[third eye]

They don't need to be. They will do what the Army asks them to do. This is how things are bro, not like how you think, sorry.

You sure you are an Indian ?

the Army has been asking for One Rank One Pension for years and has not yet got it & why would the Army want a part of Tibet ??