What's new

Evolution of the meaning of India throughout history. The Final Debate

Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
3,309
Reaction score
-7
Country
India
Location
Germany
Let's see it in a way people would understand

Babylonian World Map ca. 600 BCE: (No Mention of Indus or hte big continents only focussing on the Fertile Crescent)

BabylonianWorldMap2.jpg




Map of Anaximander ca. 550 BC: (Shows Asia but not much else for our relevance)

480px-Anaximander_world_map-en.svg.png




Map of Hecataeus of Miletus ca. 500 BCE identifies Indus Valley as India

493px-Hecataeus_world_map-en.svg.png




Eratosthenes ca. 200 BCE (Shows Entire subcontinent as India)



640px-Mappa_di_Eratostene.jpg



Posidonious ca.100 BCE (fails to show either Indus or Indus Valley or India or fails to name them properly)

Worldmaphedo.jpg



Strabo roughly 1 AD: (Shows entire subcontinent as India)

640px-C%2BB-Geography-Map1-StrabosMap.PNG



Pomponius Mela ca.40 AD: (Debatable but I would say he shows entire subcontinent as India)

560px-Karte_Pomponius_Mela.jpg







Ptolemy's world Map: (shows Two Indias..One between Indus River and Ganges and another East of Ganges)

PtolemyWorldMap.jpg





Tabula Peutingeriana ca.300 AD : (basically a road network map of Roman Empire still tries to squeeze contemporary knowledge of the world...The Word India extends till south and the sea opening of Rive Ganges)


1280px-TabulaPeutingeriana.jpg







I rest my case.. Ertosthenes onwards, India has meant the whole of subcontinental landmass ....that's 2,200 years

More than the history of even Christianity


I have deliberately not included the higher resilution images as that may crash many computers..You are encouraged to find the higher resolutions on wikicommons, if in doubt

@Indus Pakistan
 
India has meant the whole of subcontinental
Although non of the original maps used 'India' but these have been transliterated probably in the 19th century. But besides transliteration how do you translate the contents? I mean the maps also mention Europe, Africa or even call it Libya.
 
How many of these are first hand accounts?

India's map and territorial definition is subject to change. This is however proven by this thread
 
The Arab historians, when they mentioned "India" or "Arz (land) al Hind", they only meant southern and eastern parts of the Indian peninsula. The Northern parts (modern day Pakistan roughly; the Indus basin) were referred to by Arabs as "The Nation of Sindh" always.

For reference: "Meadows of gold and mines of gems" by Al-Masudi; "the Herodotus of the Arabs" (p.176):
al masudi.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • masudi2.jpeg
    masudi2.jpeg
    82.4 KB · Views: 21

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom