What's new

Einstein's "Time Dilation" Prediction Verified

Levina

BANNED
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
15,278
Reaction score
59
Country
India
Location
United Arab Emirates
Einstein's "Time Dilation" Prediction Verified
Experiments at a particle accelerator have confirmed the "time dilation" effect predicted by Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity
ebf742ab2a88e2230ce4d6777cdfa912.gif
Sep 22, 2014 |By Alexandra Witze and Nature magazine

••
6a70c3a8b605f3fd7213b63d0d2e93e9.jpg

Physicists have verified a key prediction of Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity with unprecedented accuracy. Experiments at a particle accelerator in Germany confirm that time moves slower for a moving clock than for a stationary one.

The work is the most stringent test yet of this ‘time-dilation’ effect, which Einstein predicted. One of the consequences of this effect is that a person travelling in a high-speed rocket would age more slowly than people back on Earth.

Few scientists doubt that Einstein was right. But the mathematics describing the time-dilation effect are “fundamental to all physical theories”, says Thomas Udem, a physicist at the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany, who was not involved in the research. “It is of utmost importance to verify it with the best possible accuracy.”

The paper was published on September 16 in Physical Review Letters. It is the culmination of 15 years of work by an international group of collaborators including Nobel laureate Theodor Hänsch, director of the Max Planck optics institute.

To test the time-dilation effect, physicists need to compare two clocks — one that is stationary and one that moves. To do this, the researchers used the Experimental Storage Ring, where high-speed particles are stored and studied at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for heavy-ion research in Darmstadt, Germany.

The scientists made the moving clock by accelerating lithium ions to one-third the speed of light. Then they measured a set of transitions within the lithium as electrons hopped between various energy levels. The frequency of the transitions served as the ‘ticking’ of the clock. Transitions within lithium ions that were not moving served as the stationary clock.

The researchers measured the time-dilation effect more precisely than in any previous study, including one published in 2007 by the same research group. “It’s nearly five times better than our old result, and 50 to 100 times better than any other method used by other people to measure relativistic time dilation,” says co-author Gerald Gwinner, a physicist at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada.

Understanding time dilation has practical implications as well, he notes. Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites are essentially clocks in orbit, and GPS software has to account for tiny time shifts when analysing navigational information. The European Space Agency plans to test time dilation in space when it launches its Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space (ACES) experiment to the International Space Station in 2016.

The speed of fast-moving ions means that accelerator experiments can test time dilation more precisely than experiments in Earth orbit, says Matthew Mewes, a physicist at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, who is not part of the team. “It’s important to look wherever we can and push the technology whenever possible,” he says.

But the research group is dismantling its longtime collaboration, as there is no larger accelerator they can go to for more powerful tests. “It's been many hours in basements, in shielded rooms with noisy equipment, and in the end you get one number,” says Gwinner. “We’ve been exchanging a bunch of nostalgic e-mails.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on September 19, 2014.
******************

Though the theory has been proved earlier also by sending a clock on rocket, this time scientists have been able to prove it with a new method.
 
. .
it means future travel is possible...
Well if space travelling reduces aging then its good news for those who are planning to explore space.
But scientists have this knowledge since long and no break throughs have been made yet.
 
. .
Well if space travelling reduces aging then its good news for those who are planning to explore space.
But scientists have this knowledge since long and no break throughs have been made yet.
yes because in order to prove it we have to achieve near light speed..which is impossible...
 
.
yes because in order to prove it we have to achieve near light speed..which is impossible...
inface even speed greater than light is also possible with wrap drive.wrap drive is answer to interstellar travel. Nasa is working on wrape drive engines. but we have to wait for god knows how many decades.:tsk:
 
.
inface even speed greater than light is also possible with wrap drive.wrap drive is answer to interstellar travel. Nasa is working on wrape drive engines. but we have to wait for god knows how many decades.:tsk:
its only in theory which is based on space time plane....but very very difficult to achieve because:

1. to move a object ..energy is required and keep accelerating it ...more and more energy required..but problem is when the object is about to achieve near light speed..its mass will become infinite hence required infinite energy to move it..which is impossible.

2. for beating the speed of light...we required that objects which are not made up by light i.e every atom and molecule have electromagnetic field hence light also..so how can the same object beat the speed of light which links its atoms.
 
.
its only in theory which is based on space time plane....but very very difficult to achieve because:

1. to move a object ..energy is required and keep accelerating it ...more and more energy required..but problem is when the object is about to achieve near light speed..its mass will become infinite hence required infinite energy to move it..which is impossible.

2. for beating the speed of light...we required that objects which are not made up by light i.e every atom and molecule have electromagnetic field hence light also..so how can the same object beat the speed of light which links its atoms.

What about negative mass?
 
.
What about negative mass?

it is very hard to believe that a particle can have negative mass.....all particles even light are bound to face gravitational force..even photon which are assumed to have zero mass they do feel the gravity...

it doesn't mean the negative mass doesn't exist but no observation evidence available for those till date.
may be mathematically it is possible but it doesn't mean that every mathematical meaning will have physical meaning also.
 
. .
That is purely hypothetical, and is against the law of thermodynamics, i think.
yes partially correct..but we can't say anything..because in science everything is possible.

but it will cheat the newton's third law.....
 
.
I want a machine that allows me to live in the past again...just 11 years ago to be precise. I'd like to re-live the period between Jan-2003-Sept-2003 ;)
 
.
I watched a series by Dr. Michio Kaku, Physics of the Impossible, its a good series for sci fi fans, who wants to know things like teleportation, travelling through space, etc. One episode is dedicated to each topic, and by the end of the episode, he will suggest that all of those things are possible theoretically, but we don't have the resources yet. For example, to travel through space, we would need a starship which can bend space and time, by powering it with energy way more than the total amount of energy found in this planet.
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom