What's new

Disarmament panel puts India, Pak in same category

BlackSonic

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
NEW DELHI: An international commission on disarmament and non-proliferation has criticised the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal and clubbed India
and Pakistan in the same category.

A report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament has proposed cutting down the world’s nuclear weapons from 23,000 to 2,000 by 2025 and suggested that all nuclear states should have a ‘no first use’ stance. The commission is actually the brainchild of Japan and Australia.

But what has caught India’s attention is the strong criticism of its civilian nuclear programme and the nuclear deal. The report draws the conclusion that civilian nuclear expansion is only going to lead to nuclear proliferation.The other issue is that the report also puts India in the same category as Pakistan in spite of
India’s stellar record on non-proliferation. India is clubbed with Pakistan throughout the report.


Sources pointed out that the report was an attempt to bring in the non-proliferation regime through a document on disarmament. “The disappointment is that it is going in the direction of the non-proliferation treaty in the guise of shoring up nuclear disarmament,” sources said.

Incidentally, India was represented at the commission by former National Security Advisor Brajesh Mishra, who was one of the 15 commissioners. Though India has found many ideas in the report acceptable, it has also found the effort to bring in an NPT regime disquieting and disappointing. Incidentally, Mr Mishra has been one of the strongest backers of the Indo-US nuclear deal.

India has been labelled one of the ‘three elephants’ outside the nuclear club. “Recognising the reality that the three nuclear-armed states now outside the NPT — India, Pakistan and Israel — are not likely to become members any time soon, every effort should be made to achieve their participation in parallel instruments and arrangements which apply equivalent non-proliferation and disarmament obligations,” the report said.

The report advocates applying equivalent non-proliferation and disarmament obligations for the three countries. Sources said the advocation of non-proliferation ‘disciplines’ for non-NPT states ignores India’s existing commitments and responsible behaviour in comparison with NPT five and Pakistan.

The report has pushed forward the NPT regime in view of the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal. “The problem has now been accentuated by the India-US deal, endorsed by the Nuclear Suppliers Group in 2008, to give India access, effectively, to the nuclear cooperation benefits of the NPT while making no significant commitments in return,” the report said.

The report also says the credibility of the NSG has also been put at risk because of the 2008 exemption to India. The report advocates delegitimisation of nuclear weapons and suggests that the eight nuclear states adopt a no-first-use policy. It endorses a nuclear weapons convention as the preferred instrument for disarmament.

Disarmament panel puts India, Pak in same category- Politics/Nation-News-The Economic Times
 
Last edited:
.
NEW DELHI: An international commission on disarmament and non-proliferation has criticised the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal and clubbed India
and Pakistan in the same category.

A report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament has proposed cutting down the world’s nuclear weapons from 23,000 to 2,000 by 2025 and suggested that all nuclear states should have a ‘no first use’ stance. The commission is actually the brainchild of Japan and Australia.

But what has caught India’s attention is the strong criticism of its civilian nuclear programme and the nuclear deal. The report draws the conclusion that civilian nuclear expansion is only going to lead to nuclear proliferation.The other issue is that the report also puts India in the same category as Pakistan in spite of
India’s stellar record on non-proliferation. India is clubbed with Pakistan throughout the report.


Sources pointed out that the report was an attempt to bring in the non-proliferation regime through a document on disarmament. “The disappointment is that it is going in the direction of the non-proliferation treaty in the guise of shoring up nuclear disarmament,” sources said.

Incidentally, India was represented at the commission by former National Security Advisor Brajesh Mishra, who was one of the 15 commissioners. Though India has found many ideas in the report acceptable, it has also found the effort to bring in an NPT regime disquieting and disappointing. Incidentally, Mr Mishra has been one of the strongest backers of the Indo-US nuclear deal.

India has been labelled one of the ‘three elephants’ outside the nuclear club. “Recognising the reality that the three nuclear-armed states now outside the NPT — India, Pakistan and Israel — are not likely to become members any time soon, every effort should be made to achieve their participation in parallel instruments and arrangements which apply equivalent non-proliferation and disarmament obligations,” the report said.

The report advocates applying equivalent non-proliferation and disarmament obligations for the three countries. Sources said the advocation of non-proliferation ‘disciplines’ for non-NPT states ignores India’s existing commitments and responsible behaviour in comparison with NPT five and Pakistan.

The report has pushed forward the NPT regime in view of the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal. “The problem has now been accentuated by the India-US deal, endorsed by the Nuclear Suppliers Group in 2008, to give India access, effectively, to the nuclear cooperation benefits of the NPT while making no significant commitments in return,” the report said.

The report also says the credibility of the NSG has also been put at risk because of the 2008 exemption to India. The report advocates delegitimisation of nuclear weapons and suggests that the eight nuclear states adopt a no-first-use policy. It endorses a nuclear weapons convention as the preferred instrument for disarmament.

Disarmament panel puts India, Pak in same category- Politics/Nation-News-The Economic Times


:) Good step that they have started talking about India, Pakistan and Israel in the same breath viz a viz NPT.
 
.
:) Good step that they have started talking about India, Pakistan and Israel in the same breath viz a viz NPT.

Logically it was not right to give india prefrentiall treatment with regards to nuclear deal, but at the same time logic does says this too that india and israel cannot be equated to pakistan who have a proven profiliation record..!!!! ;)
 
.
Logically it was not right to give india prefrentiall treatment with regards to nuclear deal, but at the same time logic does says this too that india and israel cannot be equated to pakistan who have a proven profiliation record..!!!! ;)

Both logics are wrong.

Personally i am for weapons, nukes for every nation unless big fishes disarm their ownselves.

Israel is the cause for tension in ME and it can put on fire the entire ME.

Anyway either ban everyone under NTP or do not carry a double face simple as that.
 
.
Both logics are wrong.

Personally i am for weapons, nukes for every nation unless big fishes disarm their ownselves.

Israel is the cause for tension in ME and it can put on fire the entire ME.

Anyway either ban everyone under NTP or do not carry a double face simple as that.

Well agree with you on that, but my logic was based on given circumstances with respect to the treatment of pakistan india and israel.

And sure, i support just like india a nuclear free world, thats why we didnt sign it in the first place..:)
 
.
Both logics are wrong.

Personally i am for weapons, nukes for every nation unless big fishes disarm their ownselves.

Israel is the cause for tension in ME and it can put on fire the entire ME.

Anyway either ban everyone under NTP or do not carry a double face simple as that.

you are wrong.

India and Israel are both to some extent trouble makers in the region, thus these two nations should be forced to destroy all nukes. you can just check how many neighbor countries they fought in the past 50 years.
 
.
Well agree with you on that, but my logic was based on given circumstances with respect to the treatment of pakistan india and israel.

And sure, i support just like india a nuclear free world, thats why we didnt sign it in the first place..:)

Well i dont think so there should be any reason why the three countries should not be treated in the same manner because almost every nuclear power got and transffered the nuke tech through illegal channels.
 
.
you are wrong.

India and Israel are both to some extent trouble makers in the region, thus these two nations should be forced to destroy all nukes. you can just check how many neighbor countries they fought in the past 50 years.

First China disarm their weapons. Then you can advice other countries. It is China that creates instability in the world.

If you can stay away from the threads so that they can continue their purpose
 
.
Well i dont think so there should be any reason why the three countries should not be treated in the same manner because almost every nuclear power got and transffered the nuke tech through illegal channels.

Proof..!!! Jana..!! where are the proofs..!!! Simply imagining a profileration out of hardend hate... doesnt satisfy the world community they need proof..!!!:lol:
 
.
you are wrong.

India and Israel are both to some extent trouble makers in the region, thus these two nations should be forced to destroy all nukes. you can just check how many neighbor countries they fought in the past 50 years.

And i assume that means everybody else gets to keep nuke's.

As you have deemed Indians and Israeli's are evil by their very nature.
You have deemed to strip them of their rights or privileges.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom