What's new

Defence spending under threat

IamINDIA

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 8, 2010
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
Union Budget 2013-14: Defence and welfare spending to be slashed
P Chidambaram
Finance Minister P Chidambaram has staked his reputation on lowering the deficit to 5.3 percent of GDP to improve the investment climate.
Reuters | Jan 31, 2013, 06.40PM IST
NEW DELHI: Finance minister P Chidambaram is putting welfare, defence and road projects on the chopping block in a last-ditch attempt to hit a tough fiscal deficit target by March, risking short-term economic growth and angering cabinet colleagues.

The cuts will reduce spending by about 1.1 trillion Indian rupees ($20.6 billion) in the current financial year, some 8 percent of budgeted outlay, or roughly 1 percent of estimated gross domestic product, two senior finance ministry officials and a senior government adviser told Reuters.

It is the first time the scale of the cuts and details of where the axe will fall have been made public, with officials revealing startling details about delays to arms purchases and belt-tightening for politically sensitive rural welfare schemes in an election year.

Finance Minister P Chidambaram has staked his reputation on lowering the deficit to 5.3 percent of GDP to improve the investment climate following ratings agency threats to downgrade to junk India's sovereign debt if action was not taken.

After a series of investor-friendly reforms and small steps to reduce fuel subsidies, he has now turned firepower on big-spending colleagues, some of whom are pushing back, worried cuts will hit voters ahead of a national election due in early 2014.

"Every ministry is affected by the budget cuts. We are trying hard to get as much money as possible," said a senior official in the road transport ministry, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue.

A drop-off in investment, hurting growth, is blamed in part on public spending that is funded through market borrowing crowding out the private sector.

Policymakers say getting India's finances in order will give private players room to borrow and the confidence to invest.

"With fiscal discipline, what will happen is that there will be larger money with the private sector, which can be used for the growth," said BK Chaturvedi, a senior adviser to the government on infrastructure spending.

Chidambaram will officially report the revised spending figures for 2012/13 when he presents next year's budget to parliament on February 28.

"It is I who have done the math, the deficit will remain below 5.3 percent this year, next year it will be below 4.8 percent. I am not going to cross these red lines," Chidambaram told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday.

His attention has turned to spending because revenue has dropped. The economy is on track to grow about 5.6 percent this year, the lowest rate for a decade, and the government is struggling to raise $10 billion in hoped-for windfall cash from partial privatisations and mobile spectrum sales.

The government had originally targeted a fiscal deficit of 5.1 percent in the current financial year, but loosened the target in October. It was 5.8 percent in 2011/12.

Javelin slowed?

The impact of measures to cut bloated subsidies will mostly not be felt this fiscal year, which runs to the end of March.

"We are estimating a budget cut of 1.1 trillion rupees ($20.6 billion) as an outer limit. However, the final picture will be clear by March 15 when we have a clear idea about tax collections and the fuel subsidy bill," said a senior finance ministry official, who declined to be named.

A senior official at the defence ministry -- the world's biggest arms importer in recent years -- said a $1.9 billion cut there could delay efforts to buy howitzer guns and Javelin anti-tank missiles from the United States by at least few months.

"The Indian army would be hit hard due to budget cuts," said the official, noting that a defence deal worth more $12 billion for procuring 126 jet fighters from France's Rafale was already delayed by at least three months.

Up to $4 billion will be lost at the rural development ministry, which has the largest budget after defence, hitting spending on roads, housing, and the government's flagship rural job-guarantee programme, a senior official in the ministry said.

Top officials at the finance, transport, rural development ministries and a government body on spending said ministries were likely to get 20-30 percent less funds for assets and projects such as roads, power, rural housing, jobs and shipping.

Risk of deepening slowdown

Critics warn that at a time of low growth, lower spending risks deepening the slowdown without helping the deficit-to-GDP ratio, a problem familiar to the austerity-racked economies of Europe.

Chidambaram's cuts mainly affect capital investment and he has avoided attacking government wage bills and subsidy spending known in India as "non-plan expenditure".

Even so, powerful ministers have protested about the impact lower spending will have.

Jairam Ramesh, rural development Minister and a close confidant of Rahul Gandhi, Congress's likely candidate for prime minister in next year's vote, wrote to Chidambaram asking for a review of the cuts to rural welfare.

"Both prime minister and you have spoken about the need for fiscal consolidation, but not at the cost of our social priorities," a government source said, reading from the letter to the finance ministry.

Congress draws support from India's rural majority and a second-term victory in 2009 was partly due to a scheme guaranteeing work to the country's poor, along with a $13 billion farm debt waiver introduced by Chidambaram.

Abheek Barua, chief economist at HDFC Bank, India's second largest private lender, recognised the need to lower the deficit but said the cuts would hit the investment cycle and short-term demand and damage a drive to improve creaking infrastructure.

"Ideally the government should have cut non-planned expenditure such as subsidies," he said. "It also fails to a address the supply bottlenecks leading to inflationary pressures."

The finance minister was backed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia in a series of meetings with government officials, two officials privy to the agenda of the meetings said. Congress leaders have publicly given backing to fiscal consolidation in recent days.

Harvard-educated Chidambaram has promised to provide enough funds for the government's flagship programmes -- food security, rural jobs, village roads, health and education in the budget -- once he succeeds in improving the government deficit this year.

India earmarked $97 billion for spending on such projects out of the $278 billion budget for the current fiscal year.

The finance ministry has also imposed a ban on hiring in ministries, meetings at luxury hotels, the purchase of new vehicles and places some restrictions on foreign tours.
 
The goal is to reduce the deficit to 5.3%?

They should lower it further. Even the EU mandates that member nations should not go over a 3% deficit. (Though most EU nations are well beyond this limit.)

Defence spending should NOT be cut though. They should just cut the politically motivated welfare schemes instead.
 
The goal is to reduce the deficit to 5.3%?
They should lower it further. Even the EU mandates that member nations should not go over a 3% deficit. (Though most EU nations are well beyond this limit.)
Defence spending should NOT be cut though. They should just cut the politically motivated welfare schemes instead.
Elections are approaching and CONgress is loosing ground. They will try to woo voters. They don't care of National Interest right now.
 
The goal is to reduce the deficit to 5.3%?

They should lower it further. Even the EU mandates that member nations should not go over a 3% deficit. (Though most EU nations are well beyond this limit.)

Defence spending should NOT be cut though. They should just cut the politically motivated welfare schemes instead.

CD, currently the Budget Deficit is 5.9% of the GDP, they wanted to bring it to 5.3% by this fiscal end, clearly GOI is finding it hard to do so b'coz of various social sector schemes like MNREGA, subsidy bill close to Rs 2 lakh crore, etc. but there are inherent flaws in these, like for eg. MNREGA, though a great scheme, has also become easy prey for Corrupt govt. officials, so the scheme is not reaching those people whom it was intended for. Secondly, GOI gives subsidy on diesel, again there is a big FLAW in the scheme as the rich people (those who can afford Diesel SUVs) are also getting benefited by the subsidy.

As if this was not enough, GOI is thinking on bringing Food Subsidy Bill, which will burdened GOI in the tune of Rs. 1 lakh crores.

Now, I find this quite surprising that why should Defence Spending get a hit b'coz of Govts. flawed policies?? I think the Defence of the nation should be it's biggest priority since if there will be no nation than what will we do of social sector schemes??

As for the comfort zone of Budget deficit, RBI defines that Budget Deficit close to 4% is the one India can easily afford, and it was close to it some years back, but massive subsidies had increased it to 6.4% just 1-2 years back.
 
@arp2041

Diesel price control given to Companies with 50 Paise increase per month will increase inflation. Petrol prices hike can be faced. But increase in prices of Essential items will hit us back. There are 450 million poor. Most of them may not have petrol vehicles, farmers use tractors for transport and travel purpose or use a bus to go anywhere. This policy will hit the most poor segment.

I have seen people buying Oil for 2 Rps. Now if same quantity costs 2.5 Rps, they will be affected most. But I can easily pay 2 to 3 Rps for petrol, extra.

Economic condition worsening of lower income class creates social troubles, migration and other problems indirectly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Accha hai.. if there is a bit more control on defence expenditure, then our army and air chiefs will be more prone to support indigenous products like LCA and Arjun
 
Near election cutting down of welfare budget don't sound like a good strategy.
 
@arp2041

Diesel price control given to Companies with 50 Paise increase per month will increase inflation. Petrol prices hike can be faced. But increase in prices of Essential items will hit us back. There are 450 million poor. Most of them may not have petrol vehicles, farmers use tractors for transport and travel purpose or use a bus to go anywhere. This policy will hit the most poor segment.

I have seen people buying Oil for 2 Rps. Now if same quantity costs 2.5 Rps, they will be affected most. But I can easily pay 2 to 3 Rps for petrol, extra.

Economic condition worsening of lower income class creates social troubles, migration and other problems indirectly.

This was the same argument given before 1991 LPG policy that if foreign companies will enter India than it will effect local production instead the competition increased, Indian people got more efficient & did the things which no one imagined, case being Tata Motors acquisition of JLR. Same was the case put on against opening of Shopping malls, but now we see both Shopping Malls & retailers getting adopted to the changed scenarios & earning even more than they used to earn.

The Point is that YES govt. should work for the betterment of the people esp. the needy ones but it can't always act as there NANNY. Let's say GOI still regulates Diesel pricing but the question is how long can it afford to do so?? Oil prices are decided in International markets, it is not decided by GOI & we all know that they are on constant rise & will only rise in time to come, so one day GOI have to De-regulize Diesel prices so why not now?? The people have to get ADOPTED to it someday as this is indeed the world of Darwinian Principle - Survival of the Fittest (that may not sound right but this is how the world is).

Having said that, if there is still an urgent need for regulation than why not apply something called - DIFFERENTIAL PRICING MECHANISM, where the rich should pay higher for the diesel, but here we are finding that both rich & the poor are buying the fuel on the same price, this is BS.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't mind cutting the defense budget if it is good for long run in term of economy.
 
@arp2041 You are right about pricing system. I am against the move just because of same thing you said. This BS is where I have problem. Like IT is trying to tax rich people more, diesel prices especially for mode of transportation that affects essential commodities price.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How many times has this news been reported now? 3? 4? We are talking about a <$2BN USD cut for the FY 2012-13. The defence budget 2013-14 will once again rise so at most these Cuts will delay 1 or 2 projects by a few weeks or at worse a few months.



Fair enough- economic considerations should always be number 1 priority for any country.
 
All ministries will be affected. 2 billion more or less wont make much difference for important deals like the MMRCA anway.
As long as it improves investment climate its not a big deal.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom