What's new

Defection delivers Beijing’s nuclear secrets to Washington

Odysseus

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 9, 2015
Messages
271
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
e743a3812d5a764c9b8247c55e06b3a7

Chinese security Tsar Meng Jianzhu with late North Korean leader Kim Jong-il in Pyongyang in 2011.


China’s most senior communist cadres have been told the party faces its most damaging case of treason since the founding of the regimen in 1949.

In a confidential speech to party cadres reported by two independent political magazines in Hong Kong, Meng Jianzhu, the country’s security tsar, revealed that the most closely guarded secrets, including nuclear codes, had been lost to America.

Mr Meng was reporting on the failure of his attempts to lure back a leading defector and the fallout of the incident.

The state secrets passed to Washington included personnel data, communications codes, nuclear weapons launch protocols and blueprints of the Zhongnanhai leadership compound, the magazines reported.

Ling Wancheng fled to the US after his brother Ling Jihua, the right-hand man of former president Hu Jintao, was brought down by a scandal caused when his Ferrari-driving son was killed in a spectacular car crash in central Beijing.

While Ling Jihua was detained by Chinese security, his brother escaped with a cache of 2700 classified documents as an insurance policy. The Chinese leadership sent a security delegation, headed by Mr Meng, to demand his extradition from the US last year but it returned empty-handed.

“While at the head of the party’s central institutions, director of the office of the party and the nation, Ling dared to steal top secrets from the archives in his trust and these were ultimately handed to the US,” said Mr Meng, who described the breach as the most serious in 60 years.

The magazines, Qianshao and Chengming, said three categories of classified information were handed to the Americans.

Plans for the Zhongnanhai leadership retreat, a heavily protected enclave of villas and lakes near the palaces of the emperors in Beijing, were transferred, with details of its security passwords and communications codes.

The second category included information on command and control systems linking the Communist Party central committee in times of crisis with the state council, China’s cabinet, and the Central Military Commission, the supreme command of the armed forces.

Third on the list were launch protocols and procedures devised to guarantee control over China’s non-conventional weapons, including its nuclear deterrent, by the party central committee and the CMC.

Mr Meng is reported to have spoken angrily as he detailed the case against Mr Ling at an internal party meeting in southern China.

Ling Jihua was at the heart of power until the present leader, Xi Jinping, took over in 2012. He was “responsible for the safety, health and confidentiality” of the members of China’s supreme ruling body, the Politburo standing committee, according to a profile prepared by Cheng Li of the Brookings Institution.

“He (was) also responsible for drafting key documents, collecting important information for decision-making and monitoring the implementation of central directives and the instructions of top leaders,” it added.

Chinese analysts believe the security chief’s speech may have been deliberately leaked to prepare opinion in the party for the eventual trial and conviction of Ling Jihua. The reports exculpated the man who now holds Mr Ling’s old job, Li Zhanshu.

Mr Li is even more powerful than his predecessor and accompanied the President on his tour of Britain, attending a state banquet with the Queen at Buckingham Palace.

Nocookies | The Australian
 
. . .
I knew when it was announced earlier this year that Wancheng's defection had the potential to be a major coup for US intelligence. If this is true, it's even bigger than I expected. This is a treasure trove for the CIA.
 
Last edited:
.
Knowing the nuclear protocols are useless. In fact, I even argue knowing each other nuclear protocol will ensure both sides know each other red button. For years, the US knows we have a no 1st use policy and we streamline our nuclear attack only in countermeasure. It will be automatically when we got nuke. As far as the command chain, Xi and all the ex-leaders will have the final say in a CONSENSUS basis. That is how we operated. There is no single person calling the shot. As far as communication code, those were immediately change when he defected. We are not stupid like our Indian friends here. LOL
 
.
I knew when it was announced earlier this year that Wancheng's defection had the potential to be a major coup for US intelligence. If this is true, it's even bigger than I expected. This is a treasure trove for the CIA.

Now, that is one way to score a win ;)
 
.
This sounds fishy to me.
He stole these secrets as an insurance policy...like "don't send hitmen after me or I'll give the US this supersecret stuff"?
 
.
This sounds fishy to me.
He stole these secrets as an insurance policy...like "don't send hitmen after me or I'll give the US this supersecret stuff"?

He likely handed it over in exchange for asylum. Either hand over the info, or head back to China to face prison or potentially death.

Now, that is one way to score a win ;)

Indeed, if true...

The funny thing is that there's already a Chinese here trying to convince people that handing over a couple thousand classified documents, including nuclear secrets, is not a significant intelligence haul.
 
. .
Indeed, if true...

The funny thing is that there's already a Chinese here trying to convince people that handing over a couple thousand classified documents, including nuclear secrets, is not a significant intelligence haul.

Yes, I noticed. The entire security apparatus procedures will need to be changed, from security protocols to SoPs. I work in a simple factory and its very cumbersome to devise, implement and monitor simple procedures, when you are going for third agency Audit and certification.

Try doing with the national security apparatus of an entire country as big as that of China. Where, presumably Plan A, B, C, (all procedures and contingencies) have been leaked. good luck with that.. :enjoy:
 
.
Generally speaking Ling Wancheng just give himself a death sentence ... even Washington knew some secrets also not dare to attack China (U.S still don't know where ICBM silos), some password & launch procedure can be changed, but such guy can not live in the world.
 
Last edited:
.
The fact that this news got out by some non-relevant news channel showed that we already changed tactic and protocol. It is the same as the US changing how they hack into other country after Snowden exposed them. It is similar here. Had this been a big news, you would think the neocon channels like CNN, FOX, Washington Post would be running 24/7 celebrating this. LOL
 
.
Knowing the nuclear protocols are useless. In fact, I even argue knowing each other nuclear protocol will ensure both sides know each other red button. For years, the US knows we have a no 1st use policy and we streamline our nuclear attack only in countermeasure. It will be automatically when we got nuke. As far as the command chain, Xi and all the ex-leaders will have the final say in a CONSENSUS basis. That is how we operated. There is no single person calling the shot. As far as communication code, those were immediately change when he defected. We are not stupid like our Indian friends here. LOL
No, such knowledge is NEVER useless.

Here is the proper definition and context of the word 'protocol'...

the official procedure or system of rules governing affairs of state or diplomatic occasions.

Whenever classified information is suspected to have been compromised, the technical aspects of handling such information, such as codes or transportation of, will be changed. But the official procedures and policies take much longer, if they are changed at all. We are not talking about the 'no first use' policy, but about the whys and hows of nuclear handling procedures in peace, war, and times of tension. Those policies and procedures are usually secrets and they must be.

Take the USAF for example.

In the old days, we had 'Strategic Air Command' (SAC) which is responsible for our nuclear forces. Today, we have the 'Global Strike Command' (GSC) in replacement of SAC. It is a major change in how we would wage a nuclear war, if it ever comes to that. Such a major change would require smaller changes such as which general officers would do what, report to whom, and execute what on when, etc...etc...The world would know we replaced SAC with GSC, but not those detailed policies and procedures.

So when we are looking at a couple thousands pages of official state documents, it is only the shallow minded who would dismiss this as 'useless'. This is a treasure trove of the first order.
 
.
Generally speaking Ling Wancheng just give himself a death sentence ... even Washington knew some secrets also not dare to attack China (U.S still don't know where ICBM silos), some password & launch procedure can be changed, but such guy can not live in the world.

So now the Klingons will be after Ling?
 
.
Thats some stuff US has got. Did US ever got similar information about Russians? @gambit
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom