What's new

Deconstructing Modi Agenda for Afghanistan

pakistani342

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
3,485
Reaction score
6
Country
United States
Location
United States
Interesting commentary -- thesis: Both Modi and Ghani are facing pressure at home from failure to deliver on electoral promises -- thus a hawkish foreign policy is a handy fix to their predicaments.

Article on pajhwok.com here, excerpts below:

President Ashraf Ghani made an unexpected visit to India on the Eves of Eid-ul Adha to meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi. After the meeting, Indian Prime Minister pledged an astounding one billion dollar in economic aid to Afghanistan. This tightening ties between the two countries is in a serious of sequences that has begun with President Ghani vision of investing in regional cooperation rather than relying solely on the so called international community. But cozying up to India at such a critical era at the expense of jeopardizing relation with Pakistan is not a wise policy decision. Modi is no messiah and his Agenda for Afghanistan must be critically assessed and cautiously approached.

Modi's India is in the mildest of economic progress and the steady growth of incomes to what might be called nationalists patriotic mobilization. Critics of Modi believe that in the last two years since he was elected Prime Minister, his stock of political capital has fallen considerably at home. It is increasingly becoming clear that his hyper-promises in the campaign are no longer attainable, as such an outright looking hawkish foreign policy can serve as a timely scapegoat for Modi and his party.

The critics argue that Modi’s India has been revealed to be at a depressing stage on which the demons of religious bigotry and hyper-nationalism hover unsleepingly over the vital debates of a society in transition.

...

Being hammered at home by his opponents, Modi tries to gain on his foreign policy, thus, India’s pivot east will redefine regional politics. Narendra Modi is thinking of “Act East” policy, replacing the previous government’s “Look East” policy. According to Modi, “Rapidly developing India and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) can be great partners for each other,”. Speaking in November 2014 at the annual summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations “We are both keen to enhance our cooperation in advancing balance, peace, and stability in the region.” Given these stakes, he has chosen to manipulate Afghanistan as a podium to his own ends. For Modi, Afghanistan is an important part of ideological regional project against Pakistan, rooted in deeply held beliefs. Therefore, in a calculated approach on three occasions over Afghanistan case he has tried to provoke Afghan's anti-Pakistan sentiments.

...

From Modi's rhetoric on Afghanistan, it is not difficult to read his overarching strategic nationalist agenda. The circumstances around the World, particularly in the region command on Afghanistan to make a wise choice between Modi's rhetoric and realities on the ground. India traditionally follows a progressive conservative approach towards Afghanistan. Historical experiences have shown that despite warm and usual rhetoric statements since its partition India always has tried to be a good friend in distance with Kabul, even during the 1980s when its rival Pakistan had substantive military engagement in Afghanistan.

Therefore, to locate itself in the Asians calculations, Afghanistan must not let India to use the plight and circumstances in the country to gain victory over its rival, but instead Afghanistan needs to work to balance its relations with both Pakistan and India for peace. Today it is clearly visible that Afghanistan has reached the nadir of its destruction. A peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan is an essential recipe to Asian growth. Kabul must certainly do its part. The first and foremost is to balance its relations with its neighbours as well as with the World and regional powers. It seems President Ashraf Ghani has realized this by making his first official visit to Beijing, not Washington. The narrative of the Afghan president is largely framed in an Asian future. Negotiating peace with Taliban with thorough Pakistani engagement was a smart choice and still remains the only viable option. The problem is that the government in Kabul is a direct product of the last 14 years of Western domination and close to India. The regime must win the trust of its neighbour states and India must not be the only neighbour especially an India under Narendra Modi.
 
Interesting commentary -- thesis: Both Modi and Ghani are facing pressure at home from failure to deliver on electoral promises -- thus a hawkish foreign policy is a handy fix to their predicaments.

Article on pajhwok.com here, excerpts below:

President Ashraf Ghani made an unexpected visit to India on the Eves of Eid-ul Adha to meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi. After the meeting, Indian Prime Minister pledged an astounding one billion dollar in economic aid to Afghanistan. This tightening ties between the two countries is in a serious of sequences that has begun with President Ghani vision of investing in regional cooperation rather than relying solely on the so called international community. But cozying up to India at such a critical era at the expense of jeopardizing relation with Pakistan is not a wise policy decision. Modi is no messiah and his Agenda for Afghanistan must be critically assessed and cautiously approached.

Modi's India is in the mildest of economic progress and the steady growth of incomes to what might be called nationalists patriotic mobilization. Critics of Modi believe that in the last two years since he was elected Prime Minister, his stock of political capital has fallen considerably at home. It is increasingly becoming clear that his hyper-promises in the campaign are no longer attainable, as such an outright looking hawkish foreign policy can serve as a timely scapegoat for Modi and his party.

The critics argue that Modi’s India has been revealed to be at a depressing stage on which the demons of religious bigotry and hyper-nationalism hover unsleepingly over the vital debates of a society in transition.

...

Being hammered at home by his opponents, Modi tries to gain on his foreign policy, thus, India’s pivot east will redefine regional politics. Narendra Modi is thinking of “Act East” policy, replacing the previous government’s “Look East” policy. According to Modi, “Rapidly developing India and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) can be great partners for each other,”. Speaking in November 2014 at the annual summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations “We are both keen to enhance our cooperation in advancing balance, peace, and stability in the region.” Given these stakes, he has chosen to manipulate Afghanistan as a podium to his own ends. For Modi, Afghanistan is an important part of ideological regional project against Pakistan, rooted in deeply held beliefs. Therefore, in a calculated approach on three occasions over Afghanistan case he has tried to provoke Afghan's anti-Pakistan sentiments.

...

From Modi's rhetoric on Afghanistan, it is not difficult to read his overarching strategic nationalist agenda. The circumstances around the World, particularly in the region command on Afghanistan to make a wise choice between Modi's rhetoric and realities on the ground. India traditionally follows a progressive conservative approach towards Afghanistan. Historical experiences have shown that despite warm and usual rhetoric statements since its partition India always has tried to be a good friend in distance with Kabul, even during the 1980s when its rival Pakistan had substantive military engagement in Afghanistan.

Therefore, to locate itself in the Asians calculations, Afghanistan must not let India to use the plight and circumstances in the country to gain victory over its rival, but instead Afghanistan needs to work to balance its relations with both Pakistan and India for peace. Today it is clearly visible that Afghanistan has reached the nadir of its destruction. A peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan is an essential recipe to Asian growth. Kabul must certainly do its part. The first and foremost is to balance its relations with its neighbours as well as with the World and regional powers. It seems President Ashraf Ghani has realized this by making his first official visit to Beijing, not Washington. The narrative of the Afghan president is largely framed in an Asian future. Negotiating peace with Taliban with thorough Pakistani engagement was a smart choice and still remains the only viable option. The problem is that the government in Kabul is a direct product of the last 14 years of Western domination and close to India. The regime must win the trust of its neighbour states and India must not be the only neighbour especially an India under Narendra Modi.
Seems like Ghani has lost control of his government policy and is just going along with the wishes of the NA elements in the Afghan security establishment.
He did try to do something different by visiting China and by trying to improve ties with Pakistan. But failed due to the current Kabul setup.
 
Seems like Ghani has lost control of his government policy and is just going along with the wishes of the NA elements in the Afghan security establishment.
He did try to do something different by visiting China and by trying to improve ties with Pakistan. But failed due to the current Kabul setup.

It's difficult to say what going on in Kabul (perhaps @A-Team can shed some light if he can take his presidential spokesman hat off for 5 minutes).

For example very interesting:
1. Atta M Noor is all lovey dovey vs Hekmatyar
2. All of a sudden janabe CEO CEO dropped his opposition
3. Ghani sab chose not to go to the UNGA meeting to seal the deal with Hekmatyar (if the rumor is true)??
 
Seems like Ghani has lost control of his government policy and is just going along with the wishes of the NA elements in the Afghan security establishment.
He did try to do something different by visiting China and by trying to improve ties with Pakistan. But failed due to the current Kabul setup.

India has kept its distance from afghanistan. the mess in afghanistan is about the pakistani establishment desire to swallow afghanistan.

when a lion kills a deer it is swift and clean. but when a wild dog kill a deer it is ugly. check on youtube.
pakistan is the wild dog. afghanistan is the deer.
 
It's difficult to say what going on in Kabul (perhaps @A-Team can shed some light if he can take his presidential spokesman hat off for 5 minutes).

For example very interesting:
1. Atta M Noor is all lovey dovey vs Hekmatyar
2. All of a sudden janabe CEO CEO dropped his opposition
3. Ghani sab chose not to go to the UNGA meeting to seal the deal with Hekmatyar (if the rumor is true)??

So if we go by that logic. All the rhetoric is to keep the masses focused on Pakistan while Hekmatyar is brought in from the cold.

By the way what happened to his demand about all foreign forces leaving Afghanistan and scraping the Ghani-US agreement?
 
when a lion kills a deer it is swift and clean. but when a wild dog kill a deer it is ugly. check on youtube.
pakistan is the wild dog. afghanistan is the deer.


Not kill, because it cant kill it, more like continue to drown it, keep it weak. Pakistan doesnt want a functional Afghanistan, a Afghanistan that may bring up the legitimacy of the Durrani line, etc. A strong Afghanistan that may align with India. For that, it'll continue to meddle in Afghanistan's affairs. It's no surprise Afghans cant stand Pakistan.
 
India has kept its distance from afghanistan. the mess in afghanistan is about the pakistani establishment desire to swallow afghanistan.

when a lion kills a deer it is swift and clean. but when a wild dog kill a deer it is ugly. check on youtube.
pakistan is the wild dog. afghanistan is the deer.

Well since you are an Indian everything will look like a Pakistan conspiracy to you, and I don't blame you for that, that's what the Indian media tells you day in day out.
But the reality is different. The Afghan mess is the result of America's desire to take revenge for it's defeat in Vietnam and bogging down the Soviet Union in a quagmire.
The war isn't Pakistan's doing, it's about influence and control of the Eurasian landmass.
But Pakistan does get affected as it is the neighbor with the longest land border with Afghanistan
 
India has kept its distance from afghanistan. the mess in afghanistan is about the pakistani establishment desire to swallow afghanistan.

when a lion kills a deer it is swift and clean. but when a wild dog kill a deer it is ugly. check on youtube.
pakistan is the wild dog. afghanistan is the deer.

So does that mean, it makes India as a Black Hyena, quite a resemblance I must say.:lol:
 
So does that mean, it makes India as a Black Hyena, quite a resemblance I must say.:lol:

india has little involvement in afghanistan
we do not share a land border.

Well since you are an Indian everything will look like a Pakistan conspiracy to you, and I don't blame you for that, that's what the Indian media tells you day in day out.
But the reality is different. The Afghan mess is the result of America's desire to take revenge for it's defeat in Vietnam and bogging down the Soviet Union in a quagmire.
The war isn't Pakistan's doing, it's about influence and control of the Eurasian landmass.
But Pakistan does get affected as it is the neighbor with the longest land border with Afghanistan

USA used Afghanistan in the cold war to beat the Soviets. When the Berlin war the cold war got over.

After 1990 Pakistan had a chance to negotiate with the powers to be and restore some order. The Taliban of the 1990s and the current mess is about your establishment desire to have a pliant Afghanistan.

Personally I could care less about Afghanistan
 
Not kill, because it cant kill it, more like continue to drown it, keep it weak. Pakistan doesnt want a functional Afghanistan, a Afghanistan that may bring up the legitimacy of the Durrani line, etc. A strong Afghanistan that may align with India. For that, it'll continue to meddle in Afghanistan's affairs. It's no surprise Afghans cant stand Pakistan.


What on earth is "Durrani line", Ganga dweller?

when a lion kills a deer it is swift and clean. but when a wild dog kill a deer it is ugly. check on youtube.
pakistan is the wild dog. afghanistan is the deer.


I'm sure it matters to the deer how it dies.

And we all know the lion electrically stuns the deer before he kills her in order to please those fascists at PETA.
 
Not kill, because it cant kill it, more like continue to drown it, keep it weak. Pakistan doesnt want a functional Afghanistan, a Afghanistan that may bring up the legitimacy of the Durrani line, etc. A strong Afghanistan that may align with India. For that, it'll continue to meddle in Afghanistan's affairs. It's no surprise Afghans cant stand Pakistan.
Afghans have hated Pakistan since 1947. With a visceral arrogant hate. Pakistan only interfered as a response many years later.
 
I know many afghans who hate themselves being called afghans ...
 
A strong Afghanistan that may align with India.
When last time it was in full power after swallowing whole of NWFP,BALOCHISTAN,SINDH ,PUNJAB and parts of Gujarat,kabul just defeated marhatas in Battle of panipat and sacked delhi and I am sure it will do it again once it's swallowed by Pakistan or it swallows it.
 
USA used Afghanistan in the cold war to beat the Soviets. When the Berlin war the cold war got over.

After 1990 Pakistan had a chance to negotiate with the powers to be and restore some order. The Taliban of the 1990s and the current mess is about your establishment desire to have a pliant Afghanistan.

Personally I could care less about Afghanistan

When the cold war finished Pakistan did it's best to stabilise Afghanistan. The unity government was agreed upon in Peshawar. It was the warlords infighting and their inability to work together which destroyed Afghanistan. The rise of the Taliban was a response to the chaos and depravity of the warlord era.
Every possible way Pakistan tried to stabilise Afghanistan, and the warlords who are part of the current government are the ones who destroyed it.
 
When the cold war finished Pakistan did it's best to stabilise Afghanistan. The unity government was agreed upon in Peshawar. It was the warlords infighting and their inability to work together which destroyed Afghanistan. The rise of the Taliban was a response to the chaos and depravity of the warlord era.
Every possible way Pakistan tried to stabilise Afghanistan, and the warlords who are part of the current government are the ones who destroyed it.

i do not buy it.

Pakistan had a chance to push the Mujahdeen leadership to form a national unity government with the communists. The communist govt had a large army and SCUD missiles.

I can see at least four or five missed opportunities
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom