What's new

Covid-19: Chinese vaccines may need changes to improve efficacy, admits official

Hamartia Antidote

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
35,188
Reaction score
30
Country
United States
Location
United States

China may need to replace its coronavirus vaccines or change the way they are administered in order to make them sufficiently effective against the SARS-Cov2 virus, the head of China’s Centre for Disease Prevention and Control said this weekend.

“We will solve the problem that current vaccines don’t have very high protection rates,” said George Gao, director general of the Chinese CDC, on 11 April at a Chengdu conference on covid-19 vaccines. “It’s now under consideration whether we should use different vaccines from different technical lines for immunisation.”

Existing vaccines might see changes in dosage, dosing interval, or number of doses, said Gao, or their administration might be mixed with vaccines based on different technologies. “Everyone should consider the benefits mRNA vaccine technology can bring for humanity,” said Gao. “We must follow it carefully and not ignore it just because we already have several types of vaccines already.”

Gao’s comments were widely seen as either an inadvertent slip or a deliberate attempt to pressure China’s government into pursuing mRNA vaccines, rather than a planned official admission. His words spread rapidly on Chinese social media before being censored. Chinese citizens continue to discuss the surprise admissions online, using deliberate misspelling to evade censors.

Gao later told journalists that his comments had been misinterpreted, and that he was referring to problems with all covid vaccines, not just China’s. Chinese state media repeated that claim.

China’s leading vaccines1 are largely based on inactivated virus technology of long standing, while the Oxford AstraZeneca, Johnson and Johnson, and Sputnik vaccines use non-coronavirus live viral vectors altered to exhibit the coronavirus spike protein. Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines use the latest technology, messenger RNA.

China’s pharmaceutical firms say they are rapidly mastering mRNA technology. Asked about Gao’s comments, another Chinese health official, Wang Huaqing, said, “The mRNA vaccines developed in our country have also entered the clinical trial stage.”

The phase III trials of China’s existing vaccines remain unpublished. For CoronaVac, the vaccine made by private company Sinovac, phase 1 and II data has been published2—showing a limited antibody response—while state owned Sinopharm has only said that its two vaccines have efficacy of 79.4% and 72.5%, based on interim results.

The phase III Sinovac trials conducted in Brazil, Chile, Indonesia, Turkey, and the Philippines have so far given sharply disparate unpublished results, with Brazilian researchers finding 50.7% efficacy, or 62.3% with longer dosing intervals,3 while Turkish researchers reported 83.5% efficacy.4 Sinovac’s efficacy was not diminished by the Brazilian P.1 variant, researchers there said.

A study of the Sinovac rollout by the University of Chile reported that the vaccine was 56.5% effective two weeks after second doses were administered in the country. However, they also reported that one dose was just 3% effective (rising to 27.7% within two weeks of the second dose, and 56.5% two weeks later).5

Responding to Gao’s comments, Siti Nadia Tarmizi, a spokeswoman for Indonesia’s covid-19 vaccine programme, said that her country’s phase III Sinovac trial will report efficacy of 65%.6 “The ability to form antibodies in our bodies is still very good,” she said.

The Sinopharm company and the United Arab Emirates, which uses a Sinopharm vaccine, have both recently experimented with an extra third dose, hoping to increase antibody response.

For some governments, shortage of Chinese vaccines remains a bigger headache than worries about efficacy, as the pace of deliveries has fallen off. In Turkey, most vaccination sites were closed this week as President Erdogan’s government publicly complained about delays in receiving promised doses of the Sinovac vaccine. Egypt has received only a small fraction of its order. Brazil’s government has publicly asked China for more.

Many observers question if Chinese production can meet existing commitments, even as China’s government makes new promises abroad. Health official Wang Huaqing said this weekend that China expects to manufacture about three billion vaccine doses in 2021, of unspecified type. To date, China has exported about 80 million doses.

Over 60 countries have approved a Chinese vaccine and shortfalls in production or efficacy could darken the pandemic outlook for low-income countries, at a time when India is restricting vaccine exports in response to its own surge in cases.

This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ's website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.
 
Last edited:
@Song Hong @sinait any comments from the two most vocal critics of mRNA?

The usual answer tree:

Non-China: We are using X.
Chinese PDF: Is our government doing it?
Non-China: No
Chinese PDF: Then X is stupid and dangerous. I would never use it.

months pass

Chinese official: We are looking at X
Non-China: Hey looks like you guys are thinking about X.
Chinese PDF: Yes, and we have been developing X for 20 years..so it was way before the West...so we weren't copying. Bravo China for being ahead of the West in cutting edge thinking. Everybody should be like China. We are way ahead of everybody on X.
Non-China: LOL!
 
Last edited:
I have mentioned in my coment that mRna is a promising and advanced technology. It is essentially creating a virus a and so that you got immune to virus b.

The pr campaign obscure the virus nature.

And I don't trust western big pharma.

Who knows if these mrna vestige stay in our body like hiv
 
I don't trust the mRNA and DNA vaccines so I will stick to Sinovac and Sinopham.
 
I read a few paper on mRna. This is an exciting technologies in great hand. Eventually it may reverse aging, cure cancer...etc

Using a lab design virus-infested cell to kill cancer cell, or using virus to fix DNA.

But western pharma are a bunch of satanic gangs.

Dont ever trust them.

Dont use any DNA products from them.

It may turns out to be latent HIV, stays inside your body, and years later when you are dying, you dono what hits you.
 
I have mentioned in my coment that mRna is a promising and advanced technology. It is essentially creating a virus a and so that you got immune to virus b.

The pr campaign obscure the virus nature.

And I don't trust western big pharma.

Who knows if these mrna vestige stay in our body like hiv

I’m just teasing..
yes stay away from evil western pharma
 
Chinese one no blood clotting.
J&J Johnson and Johnson was banned by US government.
AstraZeneca was banned worldwide.

Those Huge Pharmaceutical Companies push vaccine hard, money, money, money, but safety was put aside.
 
you deny Astrazenaca have problem ?

No, why do you think that. It was never given approval in the US because it had just a 70% effectiveness rate just like the Chinese vaccines were not either due to only 50%-70%.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom