What's new

Conservationist or Environmentalist or Cornucopian

Are you a ...?


  • Total voters
    6

Kashmiri Pandit

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
3,023
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
Conservationism, properly understood, employs traditional values of environmental stewardship. A good steward takes care of what has been entrusted to him or her, thereby leaving an inheritance for the next generation. This worldview allows that it is ethical to employ natural resources for the betterment of humankind, as long as they are properly cared for and managed with a concern for future generations. It is permissible to cut trees, for example, as long as new ones are planted in their place. Similarly, wildlife and fish can be harvested as long as they are left in sufficient numbers to ensure future populations. Humanity is seen as an intregal part of the ecosystem rather than an intruder in the natural world.

By contrast, the worldview of many modern-day environmentalists is much different. The mindset of such adherents is pantheistic - in which nature is deified and worshiped while the welfare of humans is prioritized beneath the animal and plant kingdoms and other aspects of the natural world. According to this worldview, humans exist separate from nature and act immorally when they disturb or disrupt nature. Even the slightest disturbance - such as cutting and replanting trees - represents a violation of nature by humans.

A cornucopian believes that innovation will allow humankind to develop ways to replenish a supposedly endless supply of resources. As you can imagine, big corporations often take the cornucopian stance.

In Short !

Humans appeared on Earth because Mother Earth wanted to make use of the resources which it developed over the years ^o^ Wonder ! what if we existed before the age of Dino >_< or much much before that .


@nair @proud_indian @Roybot @jbgt90 @Sergi @Water Car Engineer @dadeechi @kurup @Rain Man @kaykay @Abingdonboy @SR-91 @nang2 @fsayed @anant_s @Joe Shearer @Tshering22 @Dandpatta @danger007 @Didact @Soumitra @SrNair
@TejasMk3
@jbgt90 @ranjeet @4GTejasBVR @The_Showstopper @guest11 @PARIKRAMA @egodoc222 @DesiGuy1403 @Nilgiri @SarthakGanguly @Omega007 @GURU DUTT @HariPrasad @JanjaWeed @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @MilSpec @Spectre @Windjammer @Horus @GURU DUTT @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @abcxyz0000
@MilSpec @Spectre
@Ryuzaki @CorporateAffairs @Zibago @Srinivas
@GR!FF!N @migflug @Levina @randomradio @Guynextdoor2 @2800 @calmDown@all @zebra7

@Chinese Bamboo @Chinese-Dragon @Godman @Gibbs

@Windjammer @Horus @Arsalan

 
.
Conservationist everything should remain in a tight balance if we over hunt or overmine the region is affected negatively
 
Last edited:
. .
I am a hanglatherium.

vahidrk1.gif
What's That ....
vahidrk1.gif
 
. . . .
Conservationism, properly understood, employs traditional values of environmental stewardship. A good steward takes care of what has been entrusted to him or her, thereby leaving an inheritance for the next generation. This worldview allows that it is ethical to employ natural resources for the betterment of humankind, as long as they are properly cared for and managed with a concern for future generations. It is permissible to cut trees, for example, as long as new ones are planted in their place. Similarly, wildlife and fish can be harvested as long as they are left in sufficient numbers to ensure future populations. Humanity is seen as an intregal part of the ecosystem rather than an intruder in the natural world.

By contrast, the worldview of many modern-day environmentalists is much different. The mindset of such adherents is pantheistic - in which nature is deified and worshiped while the welfare of humans is prioritized beneath the animal and plant kingdoms and other aspects of the natural world. According to this worldview, humans exist separate from nature and act immorally when they disturb or disrupt nature. Even the slightest disturbance - such as cutting and replanting trees - represents a violation of nature by humans.

A cornucopian believes that innovation will allow humankind to develop ways to replenish a supposedly endless supply of resources. As you can imagine, big corporations often take the cornucopian stance.

In Short !

Humans appeared on Earth because Mother Earth wanted to make use of the resources which it developed over the years ^o^ Wonder ! what if we existed before the age of Dino >_< or much much before that .


@nair @proud_indian @Roybot @jbgt90 @Sergi @Water Car Engineer @dadeechi @kurup @Rain Man @kaykay @Abingdonboy @SR-91 @nang2 @fsayed @anant_s @Joe Shearer @Tshering22 @Dandpatta @danger007 @Didact @Soumitra @SrNair
@TejasMk3
@jbgt90 @ranjeet @4GTejasBVR @The_Showstopper @guest11 @PARIKRAMA @egodoc222 @DesiGuy1403 @Nilgiri @SarthakGanguly @Omega007 @GURU DUTT @HariPrasad @JanjaWeed @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @MilSpec @Spectre @Windjammer @Horus @GURU DUTT @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @abcxyz0000
@MilSpec @Spectre
@Ryuzaki @CorporateAffairs @Zibago @Srinivas
@GR!FF!N @migflug @Levina @randomradio @Guynextdoor2 @2800 @calmDown@all @zebra7

@Chinese Bamboo @Chinese-Dragon @Godman @Gibbs

@Windjammer @Horus @Arsalan

Am I allowed to be a bit of all 3? :pleasantry:
 
.
Only continued development of human race with technological advancements can save mother earth!
 
.
By contrast, the worldview of many modern-day environmentalists is much different. The mindset of such adherents is pantheistic - in which nature is deified and worshiped while the welfare of humans is prioritized beneath the animal and plant kingdoms and other aspects of the natural world. According to this worldview, humans exist separate from nature and act immorally when they disturb or disrupt nature. Even the slightest disturbance - such as cutting and replanting trees - represents a violation of nature by humans.

l3Mv6.gif


I identify as an environmentalist and this is the first time I heard about this.
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom