I believe the doctor was not a medical doctor (rather, he held a doctorate in a field related to Pakistan's nuclear program)
No mention of Indian support of terrorism (i.e. that Pakistan and India both do it against one another, which is the only fair way to report it, especially given the people we've lost to R&AW-supported Baloch terror; this is a typical bias in almost all Western reporting, which actually makes it seem like it's all controlled from a psyops room somewhere in Virginia!)
Many sources, including Western, consider the 1965 war a stalemate whereas this article makes no mention of this fact
The article mentions the OBL raid without bringing up the very pertinent context of a Pulitzer and George Orwell Prize-winning journalist concluding that the Pakistan military high command was not only aware of the operation but had allowed/supported it. Obama mentioned the same thing in his initial announcement speech (CT cooperation with Pak intel)
The article gives no supporting evidence or even opinions on how or why Pakistan has become "weaker" by obsessing over India as our major enemy; this is similar to an article blaming Israel for considering Iran its main enemy --- except that in our case, we have caught active duty officers of Indian intelligence who have been involved in supporting terror that has claimed thousands of innocent lives. But, oh well, that doesn't matter...
The "Islamic terror policy" is a fragment of foreign intel's imagination; our alleged support of armed proxies has nothing to do with "Islam" and "terrorism," rather is a by-product of being in a neighborhood where a very belligerent neighbor whose National Security Advisor (on video) boasts of his sabotage and subversion plans against Pakistan is using Afghan territory against us; just like Israel supports Sunni radicals along its border against the Syrian regime, Pakistan had a hard choice --- Afghanistan and Kashmir both happened to be Muslim areas, but the reality in both places is that there are genuine grievances leading to a genuine insurgency. Does Pakistan support these insurgencies? It's possible. Maybe we believe that it serves the very important purpose of bogging down 600,000 Indian troops in Indian-Occupied Kashmir and ensuring that Afghanistan doesn't remain a springboard for R&AW to export terror into Pakistan.
Anyway, this is an endless debate. The quality of the article doesn't reflect well on you because you are clearly a very intelligent individual. Peace.
