Visible is not shorter than IR you twit and OZONE is only for absorb uv light didn't transfer to inner atmosphere CO2 is currently destroying OZONE and trap heat in lower atmosphere and that's why its extremely harmful for earth @undertakerwwefan
Look that's article i post and look your infograph its clearly states its shoter than visible you parannoid troll @undertakerwwefanThe shorter the wave length, the more energy. The longer the wave length, the less energy. UV is the most powerful sunlight. Can destroy DNA. IR is the weakest sunlight.
Sources:
The greater the energy, the larger the frequency and the shorter (smaller) the wavelength. Given the relationship between wavelength and frequency — the higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength — it follows that short wavelengths are more energetic than long wavelengths.
http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk/faq/answer.php.id=73&cat=light
The ozone layer, our Earth’s sunscreen, absorbs about 98 percent of this devastating UV light.
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/ozone-layer/
The total mass of ozone in the atmosphere is about 3 billion metric tons. That may seem like a lot, but it is only 0.00006 percent of the atmosphere. The peak concentration of ozone occurs at an altitude of roughly 32 kilometers (20 miles) above the surface of the Earth. At that altitude, ozone concentration can be as high as 15 parts per million (0.0015 percent).
https://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/facts/SH.html
Nope. Visible light is short wave length light. IR is long wave length light.
Get loss you troll CFC contain CARBON each molecule of carbon can destroy 1 million molecule of ozone. @undertakerwwefanVisible light has shorter wave length than IR. So visible light is more powerful than IR. O2 and N2 absorb visible, so they heat up much more than CO2 heats up.
CO2 does not destroy ozone layer. Believe what you want. You won't find any change in temperature as CO2 rises. It maxed out at 10 ppm.
Shorter you know nothing you talking about just shut the fcuk up IR is shorter than visible @undertakerwwefanLook at the numbers. Visible is 0.5 * 10^-6. IR is 10^-5. 0.5 * 10^-6 is smaller than 10^-5.
Wave length goes from big to small from left to right in this chart.
Get lost from here it has a carbon element in it i read it when you're little kid in late 90s
You post that infograph that's supports your fake narrative give me the infograph from NASA and U.N. climatic department than i could agree with you @undertakerwwefanLook at the wave picture in the chart. Longest on the left. Shortest on the right. Infrared is on the left of visible in the chart.
And what is you trying to prove,i am out from here get lost and don't qouted/tag me again just shut the fcuk up @undertakerwwefan
CO2 is not CFC. Different atoms. Different substance. Different properties. O2 don't kill you at 20% concentration. O3 kills you at less than 1 PPM = 0.0001% concentration. 1 oxygen atom. Totally different property.
Source:
Limits
* 0,06 PPM for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week (PPM = Parts Per Million)
* 0,3 PPM for maximum 15 minutes
Read more: https://www.lenntech.com/ozone-and-humans.htm#ixzz5hm2t2vuX
This is NASA source. Look at the chart. Look at the wave picture. Longest wave length at the top. Shortest wave length at the bottom.
Source: https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/toolbox/emspectrum1.html
[/QUOT
ok but tell me what Oxygen/nitrogen doing to increase with the heat here on earth, nothing @undertakerwwefan its CO2 to have a properties called greenhouse effect and trap excess heat in lower atmosphere
its not about racism or what i am taking about facts about excess CO2 which is harmful to earth atmosphere @undertakerwwefan CO2 have a extreme capacity to trap heat in atmosphere as compare to oxygen/nitrogen/ozone and give me proofs could oxygen/nitrogen/ozone remit heat waves at 24/7, 365 days of year @undertakerwwefan
