What's new

Climate Change l Global Warming l Update, News & Discussion

.
It's a good thing CO2 is inert so whatever CO2 you breathe in you breathe back out. It it were CO or O3 it's lethal at less than 5 ppm.

@pakistanipower @nahtanbob @gambit @vostok @F-22Raptor @LeGenD @KAL-EL @Get Ya Wig Split
Shut up you troll, there are alternative fuels to eliminate Excess CO2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_fuel
Methane is good options and already tested on one of the F-22 engine, Electric Cars is emerging,Bio fuels are also an good options and in Maryland already running, but brightest future is/will be hydrogen fuels and will not emitting CO2 at all but only water vapors, its similar to rocket fuels which uses hydrogen/oxygen fuels
and as for power generations there lots renewable tech which emit no CO2 at all @undertakerwwefan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_fuel
 
.
Shut up you troll, there are alternative fuels to eliminate Excess CO2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_fuel
Methane is good options and already tested on one of the F-22 engine, Electric Cars is emerging,Bio fuels are also an good options and in Maryland already running, but brightest future is/will be hydrogen fuels and will not emitting CO2 at all but only water vapors, its similar to rocket fuels which uses hydrogen/oxygen fuels
and as for power generations there lots renewable tech which emit no CO2 at all @undertakerwwefan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_fuel

Electricity don't come from nowhere. You need to burn fossil fuel to make electricity. Hell, even wind turbines and solar panels emit CO2 when they are built. Ditto with mining for uranium. Every energy source emits CO2.
 
. .
but brightest future of power generation will be SPACE BASED SOLAR POWER but i have to admit it is not feasible in 21th century and prohibitively expensive may a after century or two we will see SPACE BASED SOLAR POWER @undertakerwwefan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power

China was going to build one by 2050 but with China's crumbling economy I doubt it. Space based solar plant also need more maintenance because of cosmic ray and mini asteroids flying around damaging panels.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/03/asia/china-plans-solar-power-in-space-intl/index.html
 
.
Electricity don't come from nowhere. You need to burn fossil fuel to make electricity. Hell, even wind turbines and solar panels emit CO2 when they are built. Ditto with mining for uranium. Every energy source emits CO2.
Shut up industries have catalyst in their chimneys to either brake down CO2 to harmless gases or absorbed it @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
. .
China was going to build one by 2050 but with China's crumbling economy I doubt it. Space based solar plant also need more maintenance because of cosmic ray and mini asteroids flying around damaging panels.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/03/asia/china-plans-solar-power-in-space-intl/index.html
And there is proposals that's for those plant defense we can put LASERs on these plants for defense from Meteoroids and as for comics ray we satellites/ Space probe they are working fine for years and decades like voyagers-1,2, pioneer-9-10 New horizon,Dawn etc etc, so cosmic rays is not a problem for those plants @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

Don't exist. Also nowhere to put all that CO2.
You know nothing about emission control and yourself as an expert just shut up @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
. . .
And there is proposals that's for those plant defense we can put LASERs on these plants for defense from Meteoroids and as for comics ray we satellites/ Space probe they are working fine for years and decades like voyagers-1,2, pioneer-9-10 New horizon,Dawn etc etc, so cosmic rays is not a problem for those plants @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

No money.
 
. . .
No money.
Yes thy have lot of money NASA budget is over 15 billion $$$ but as i said SPACE BASED SOLAR POWER currently not feasible on this century but after century or two @undertakerwwefan and i am not saying that currently USA is going to bulid SPACE BASED SOLAR POWER @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:

Too poor to beat CO2 gas.
OK what next you troll USA not want alone to beat CO2 but whole world want to beat excess emission of CO2 @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
.
Yes thy have lot of money NASA budget is over 15 billion $$$ but as i said SPACE BASED SOLAR POWER currently not feasible on this century but after century or two @undertakerwwefan and i am not saying that currently USA is going to bulid SPACE BASED SOLAR POWER @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:

So? Making solar panel emits CO2. Also, mining for those rare earth elements emits CO2 they use diesel in mining machinery.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom