ghazi52
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Messages
- 103,040
- Reaction score
- 106
- Country
- Location
CJP seeks to review life imprisonment law
We will interpret the law correctly at an appropriate time. Once it happens, convicts will ask for a death sentence instead of life imprisonment
https://nation.com.pk/NewsSource/app
APP June 18, 2019
ISLAMABAD - Chief Justice of Pakistan Asif Saeed Khosa Monday said that the current interpretation of the life imprisonment law was flawed and expressed the intent to reexamine it at an “appropriate time”.
The Supreme Court rejected a review petition filed by a death sentence convict Abdul Qayyum.
A three-member Bench of the court, headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and comprising Justice Sardar Tariq Masood and Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, heard the review appeal and maintained death sentence.
During the hearing, Khosa said that the span of life imprisonment is limited to 25 years when it is meant to last a lifetime. He expressed the intent to review the law and said: “We will interpret the law correctly at an appropriate time. Once it happens, convicts will ask for a death sentence instead of life imprisonment. Once it happens, we’ll see who commits murder.”
Referring to judicial practice in India, the chief justice remarked that there life sentences were given with period of imprisonment.
This is not the first time that the judiciary has made such observations. In 2004, a five-member bench heard as many as 62 appeals that urged the apex court to reinstate death penalty for convicts whose capital punishments were commuted into life imprisonment leading to their release on the basis of remission in their imprisonment periods.
Section 57 of the Pakistan Penal Code, Fractions of terms of punishment, says: “In calculating fractions of terms of punishment, imprisonment for life shall be reckoned as equivalent to imprisonment for twenty-five years.”
The Supreme Court, however, had observed in 2004 that the provisions of the aforementioned section, which reckon 25-year imprisonment as transportation for life, only stipulate the calculation of the punishment term which is necessary because certain offences are a fraction of the term of imprisonment prescribed for other offences.
We will interpret the law correctly at an appropriate time. Once it happens, convicts will ask for a death sentence instead of life imprisonment
https://nation.com.pk/NewsSource/app
APP June 18, 2019
ISLAMABAD - Chief Justice of Pakistan Asif Saeed Khosa Monday said that the current interpretation of the life imprisonment law was flawed and expressed the intent to reexamine it at an “appropriate time”.
The Supreme Court rejected a review petition filed by a death sentence convict Abdul Qayyum.
A three-member Bench of the court, headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and comprising Justice Sardar Tariq Masood and Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, heard the review appeal and maintained death sentence.
During the hearing, Khosa said that the span of life imprisonment is limited to 25 years when it is meant to last a lifetime. He expressed the intent to review the law and said: “We will interpret the law correctly at an appropriate time. Once it happens, convicts will ask for a death sentence instead of life imprisonment. Once it happens, we’ll see who commits murder.”
Referring to judicial practice in India, the chief justice remarked that there life sentences were given with period of imprisonment.
This is not the first time that the judiciary has made such observations. In 2004, a five-member bench heard as many as 62 appeals that urged the apex court to reinstate death penalty for convicts whose capital punishments were commuted into life imprisonment leading to their release on the basis of remission in their imprisonment periods.
Section 57 of the Pakistan Penal Code, Fractions of terms of punishment, says: “In calculating fractions of terms of punishment, imprisonment for life shall be reckoned as equivalent to imprisonment for twenty-five years.”
The Supreme Court, however, had observed in 2004 that the provisions of the aforementioned section, which reckon 25-year imprisonment as transportation for life, only stipulate the calculation of the punishment term which is necessary because certain offences are a fraction of the term of imprisonment prescribed for other offences.
