What's new

Civilians can be court-martialled : Army Act amended

SherwaniAK

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Civilians can be court-martialled : Army Act amended

ISLAMABAD, Nov 10: The government on Saturday amended the Army Act of 1952 to give wide-ranging powers to the Army to court-martial civilians.

Under the amended act, the Army can now try civilians on charges ranging from treason, sedition and attack on army personnel to “assaulting the president with intent to compel or restrain the exercise of any lawful power” and “giving statements conducive to public mischief”.

The unamended Army Act, too, had a provision to hold court martial of civilians but only when at least one of the accused belonged to the armed forces.

In recent years, several members of the extremist Islamic groups have been tried and sentenced by different field court martial, but in all these cases members of the armed forces were also involved.Many of these cases related to abortive attempts on General Pervez Musharraf’s life.

Although not stated in clear terms, one of the underlined reasons for the amendment to the Army Act is said to be the inability of the existing anti-terrorism courts to hold proper or speedy trials of the people involved in acts of terrorism or fanning religious or other brands of armed militancy in the country.

“For quite some time some amendments were being considered, but the proposed amendment has now been notified,” Attorney-General Malik Mohammad Qayyum told Dawn on Saturday from Lahore.

The amendment, he said, had been made only in Section 2 (1-d) of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, by adding some more offences of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and allowing the military courts to try and convict the civilians.

The amendment has been made through an ordinance that will come into force at once and will be deemed to have taken effect from Jan 2003.

Under the amendment, a sub-clause (iia) will be inserted into the sub-clause (ii) which says: “Any offence, if committed in relation to defence or security of Pakistan or any part thereof or Armed Forces of Pakistan, punishable under the Explosive Substance Act, 1908 (VI of 1908), prejudicial conduct under the Security of Pakistan Act, 1952 (XXXV of 1952), the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 (W.P.Ord. XX of 1965), the Prevention of Anti-national Activities Act, 1974 (VII of 1974) or Anti-terrorism Act, 1997 (XXVII of 1997), Sections 109 (punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence and where no express provision is made for its punishment), 117 (abetting commission of offence by the public, or by more than ten persons), 120B (punishment of criminal conspiracy), 121 (waging or attempting to wage war or abetting waging of war against Pakistan), 121A (conspiracy to commit offences punishable by Section 121), 122 (collecting arms, etc., with intention of waging war against Pakistan), 123 (concealing with intent to facilitate design to wage war), 123A (condemnation of the creation of the state and advocacy of abolition of its sovereignty), 124 (assaulting president, governor, etc., with intent to compel or restrain the exercise of any lawful power), 124A (sedition), 148 (rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 302 (punishment of Qatl-i-amd), 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) and 505 (statement conducive to public mischief) of the Pakistan Penal Code or attempt to commit any of the said offences.”

“In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 89 of the Constitution read with proclamation of emergency of the of third day of November 2007 and the Provisional Constitution Order (PCO) No 1 of 2007, the president is pleased to make and promulgate the ordinance,” the government notification said.

Civilians can be court-martialled : Army Act amended -DAWN - Top Stories; November 11, 2007


good laws. i wonder how our brave general will arrest ppl from swat like regions.
 
Dear Salim,

I would like your take on this since most of your posts are very pragmatic and balanced but I can't help getting the feeling that you have got it wrong this time, though time will tell.

Regards
 
Dear Salim,

I would like your take on this since most of your posts are very pragmatic and balanced but I can't help getting the feeling that you have got it wrong this time, though time will tell.

Regards

Dont get me wrong. This law is aimed at lawyers, judiciary , HR activists and political opponents. When I heard of emergency first, i expected the army to go full blaze in swat and waziristan , eliminate the extremeists and bring the areas under our central administration. None of which is happening.

Is judiciary the problem? Are lawyers the elements conducting suicide bombings,?

You will agree with me when I say that situation is swat has gotten worse ever since emergency was imposed
 
Dear SAK,

I agree with you and thats been my views all along. Sometime back Salim had mentioned that this emergency could not be termed as Martial Law since there were no military courts so I am curious to know his views now that there are.

Regards
 
AsSalam oAlaikum
These are very murky waters we are enering here. The aim of this law is supression of any opposition,and to hold people without any repercussions/recourse to justice, by the army. This Law is Draconian and should be condemned in the strongest possible manner. I realize that there may be hindrances in producing witnesses in these cases, but Law has been designed to be impartial. You cannot change the rules of the game, just because you can not satisfy the criteria. I think like a few other members that this rule may be used against Political opponents rather than military ones and may come back to haunt Pervez Musharraf.
WaSalam
Araz
 
Dont get me wrong. This law is aimed at lawyers, judiciary , HR activists and political opponents. When I heard of emergency first, i expected the army to go full blaze in swat and waziristan , eliminate the extremeists and bring the areas under our central administration. None of which is happening.

Is judiciary the problem? Are lawyers the elements conducting suicide bombings,?

You will agree with me when I say that situation is swat has gotten worse ever since emergency was imposed
There is no indication it's aimed at them. In fact Musharraf was asked this very question. He informed publicly that currently in Pakistan there's no law of holding terrorists without pressing charges publicly.

Note, it's not like in America where they would be held without a trial. Only secrecy would be maintained since its not wise to disclose who you managed to capture.

Also please read the amendment in which it details who all will be tried in this court:

“(iia) any offence, if committed in relation to defence or security of Pakistan or any part thereof or Armed Forces of Pakistan, punishable under the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (VI of 1908), Prejudicial conduct under the Security of Pakistan Act, 1952 (XXXV of 1952), the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. (W.P.Ord X of 1965), the Prevention of Anti-national Activities Act, 1974 (VII of 1974) or Anti-terrorism act, 1997 (XVII of 1997), sections 109, 117, 120B, 121, 121A, 122, 123, 123A, 124, 124A, 148, 302, 353 and 505 of the Pakistan Penal Code, or attempt to commit any of the said offences.” app
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

This isn't some draconian law. It's a fair trial.

It's a direct by-product of the former CJ releasing 60 of such known terrorists due to a simple lack of proper law. Such people were already being held by the Army without a trial.
 
Dear Salim,

I would like your take on this since most of your posts are very pragmatic and balanced but I can't help getting the feeling that you have got it wrong this time, though time will tell.

Regards

I remain speechless!

Added later:

This is possibly to ensure that the dismissed/ arrested judges, who in the opinion of the govt is prejudicial for the maintenance of good order are removed off the loop to try such cases.
 
Back
Top Bottom