What's new

Chinese Type 003 Fujian vs USS Gerald R. Ford || Who Would Win Aircraft Carrier Comparison

. . . .
Typical yank always talking above everyone on behalf of every one ,the horseshit is in their culture.
The resident youtube expert thinks himself to be so brilliant by judging Chinese scientist and experts as if only he has the ability to analyze,the poor chinese don't have brain cells to think like the armchair expert.

Not like the chinese thought their defense priority is the south china sea and a nuclear carrier would be a waste of resources .

Supplying carriers is such rocket science that the disciplined(sarcasm ) american can do it.

EMALS? just because the US emals sucks means the chinese suffers from the same ?
Did the armchair expert know that the Chinese made a breakthrough in emals and, training can be done on land for emals takeoff?

The reason there's 2 elevator is because,2 is the proper no ,while 3 takes extra space and resource when 2 is more than enough and there's waste ?

Now what are the points where Fujian leads?ignored?

Now you need to watch "CHINA'S PLANS TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD" - said in his sensationalist yank accent ,fkn scammer .
 
.
Wrong comparison one is nuclear powered other is conventional powered

Fujian is nuclear powered supported by gas turbines.

You cannot power a 100,000 tones supercarrier with conventional power only.

China is very discreet with the nuclear propulsion, and therefore, the official media has never acknowledged Fujian as a conventional carrier, nor they want to disclose it.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom