What's new

Chinese Journalists Protest Official Censorship

haidian

BANNED
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
4,888
Reaction score
1
Country
China
Location
China
Chinese Journalists Protest Official Censorship



By Tom Phillips, Shanghai

10:39AM GMT 07 Jan 2013

Demonstrators staged a protest in support of one of China’s most respected and liberal newspapers as a feud over press freedom threatened to throw up the first major challenge to incoming president Xi Jinping.

Guangzhou-paper_2444566b.jpg

Demonstrators gather outside the headquarters of the Southern Weekly newspaper in Guangzhou, Guangdong province Photo: REUTERS/James Pomfret

Witnesses said up to 200 people converged outside the Guangzhou newsroom of the Southern Weekend newspaper demanding an end to the stifling censorship of their country’s media.

Photographs posted on social media showed demonstrators carrying signs calling for “free press, constitutional government and democracy.”

The protest, which ended peacefully, was triggered by an acrimonious dispute between government officials and journalists from the Southern Weekend newspaper who claim censors have been conducting an increasingly aggressive clampdown on their work since last year.

The crisis exploded into the open on New Year’s Day after Southern Weekend reporters accused Tuo Zhen, Guangdong province’s propaganda chief, of transforming a lengthy newspaper editorial calling for political reform into a gushing homage to China’s Communist Party.

According to an analysis by the University of Hong Kong’s China Media Project, the original version argued Chinese citizens should be allowed to “voice their criticisms of power loudly and confidently.” The altered text, however, was less critical and was published under the headline: ‘We Are Now Closer to Our Dream Than Ever Before’.

David Bandurski, the China Media Project editor, said Mr Tuo’s “in your face [and] offensive” intervention had proved the final straw for many of the newspaper’s censorship-weary staff, who reportedly decided to go on strike on Sunday.

The newspaper’s journalists believed propaganda officials had broken “a gentleman’s code of how you do and don’t control the media,” Mr Bandurski added. “If they don’t push back what will be left of their paper?”

The crisis escalated last Friday when journalists publically slammed Mr Tuo’s “brutal”, “ignorant” and “catastrophic” intervention.

Dozens of leading academics then followed suit, using an open letter to call on Guangdong’s new party chief, Hu Chunhua, to sack Mr Tuo for his “overbearing actions.” He Weifang, a legal expert from Peking University and one of the letter’s signatories, said the incident was a “challenge to the new central leadership.” “So far they have not displayed their stance on political reform. This time, public anger may well test the new leadership.” On Monday, one week after the adulterated editorial was published, protestors took to the streets outside the newspaper’s Guangzhou HQ.

In an apparent allusion to the death of press freedom, several carried yellow chrysanthemums.

One protestor, Ah Qiang, told the Daily Telegraph the crisis was about more than newspapers.

“This involves not just one media outlet - Southern Weekend - but everyone. It is everyone’s business. [It is about] everyone’s rights,” he said.

Mr Bandurski, from the China Media Project, said the controversy now posed serious questions of the direction China was likely to move in under incoming president Xi Jinping.

“It is not just a media story anymore. It is about what direction China is heading in,” he said.

“Ever since the 18th Communist Party Congress [Xi] has touted himself and the new top seven leaders as representing a new style of leadership and this has been pushed very heavily by the state media.” But while media reports had painted Xi as a “Spartan, no-nonsense and more open” leader, the so-called “New Year’s Greeting” episode had led many to doubt that.

“These are signs that look right now like steps backwards not steps forward,” Mr Bandurski said.

Mr He, from Peking University, said it was too early to say if Mr Tuo would be sacked or what consequences the newspaper’s journalists might face.

But the central government’s reaction would give an early indication of what ordinary Chinese could expect from their government over the coming decade, he added.

Shi Anbin, a professor of media studies from Beijing’s Tsinghua University, said the incident underlined the “ever-growing tension” between Chinese journalists and their government.

But the crisis, coming as China’s new leadership took power, could provide “an opportunity of initiating genuine press reform in China”, he added.

So far Beijing has sought to play down the incident. “There is no censorship of the media in China,” a foreign affairs spokesman said last week.
 
. .
I think government will give in, Southern Weekly will still go on for its 30 years
 
.
who is the big boss? another zhao or CIA?
 
.
Revolution in cheena is overdue. Good luck to freedom loving chinese people.

it's nothing,I hope the Journalists would win and the truth is Censorship exists in every country.
 
.
China need to learn from US. US able to bring harmony between the government and journalists, work together side by side, supporting each other, full solidarity.
 
.
China need to learn from US. US able to bring harmony between the government and journalists, work together side by side, supporting each other, full solidarity.

I lived in US before,US media is very biased when reporting international issues,full of lies and misleading comments.
 
.
Once Chinese citizen taste blood (Free media and right to expressions to citizen) its impossible to CPC to stop that revolution. may be next USSR in 1989
 
.
Once Chinese citizen taste blood (Free media and right to expressions to citizen) its impossible to CPC to stop that revolution. may be next USSR in 1989

China will never be like USSR,you just don't know Chinese culture.Chinese mentality are more money and family oriented.the majority of the people care more about making money and getting rich than any other issues.and we all know without a stable enviornment,you can't achieve those goals.
 
.
I lived in US before,US media is very biased when reporting international issues,full of lies and misleading comments.

That is what I want to say, that US government able to harmonized their journalists very well. China need to learn from them.

There are a lot of things China can learn about US. Like how they handle the domestic separatists, extremist, and political activists. US is a land of free, many people believe it and dare to cross the invisible red line. But everything handled very well by US government.
 
.
China need to learn from US. US able to bring harmony between the government and journalists, work together side by side, supporting each other, full solidarity.


American journalist understand the goal of US foreign policy. Take Iraq and Libya, American journalist are always in concert with the State department. They never stray from furthering American hegemony. MSM American journalist are loyal to the US. Why do you think every single mainstream media have the same voice as the State department's views from friend and foe? Every single article regarding China has a negative bent. Every single article leading up to the Iraq war were to encourage intervention and justifying war, same with Libya. This is not a coincident.

In America, there is a lot of freedom in reporting domestic affairs, but when it comes for foreign affairs, the MSM is pretty a bunch liars.

As for Chinese journalist, I am not sure if they are still up to level of deceits as their Western counterparts. I don't think Chinese journalist have balls to trash the West because they all probably grew up glamorizing Western societies with their rose colored glasses, while Western journalist all grew with a media and society that demonized China and Chinese constantly. Hell, you can make a career out bashing US's adversaries in the media. Chinese journalist will probably criticized Chinese government while adding credibility to the West, thus diminishing the trust between the people and the government, making harder for government policymaker. Not to mention harm on society, when people look outside the country for leadership rather than have a robust internal dialog. They haven't reach that sophistication as Western journalist when it comes mass media. Chinese journalist simply haven't earn badge yet.

The fact that Indians and American, who cheer and wish for China collapse, are all in support of these type of things, should give Chinese a reason to be wary.
 
.
China need to learn from US. US able to bring harmony between the government and journalists, work together side by side, supporting each other, full solidarity.

you are overtly naive on your perpective regarding usa and its press!
 
.
China need to learn from US. US able to bring harmony between the government and journalists, work together side by side, supporting each other, full solidarity.

hahahahahahaha really?:cheesy: Sorry, just seeing as I live in the US, Your view is absolutely outside of the stadium, to say nothing of the fact that it isn't only US media inside the US.

Americans have access to most any type of media, be that Fox, CNN, BBC, PressTV, RT, Xinhua, etc...
 
.
This is the China, not the Soviet Union. CCP not fool, Chinese ppl not blind, all world knew what happened and bad situations after the collapse of S.U.

China has been through 1989, today not worse than that time. "Development" is the only target and final purpose, who try to interrupt the "Develpment" in China, the one also affect China common ppl's interests, these guys will get punishments from China's internal ppl. Here more ppl pursue interests and profits, more stable and peace inside China.

For America, lots of anti-China and anti-CCP social activists and dissidents have come out from Red China and flee into U.S for 30years. Did they change anything in China?

CCP is smart, they knew to put Chinese ppl's interests with the stability of PRC country together. If PRC gone, okay ur guys will lose current wealth and good future, or other one party will do bad job worse than CCP(For mainland and T.W, CCP vs KMT), so CCP still get supports from the Chinese ppl.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom