Viper0011.
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2011
- Messages
- 7,253
- Reaction score
- 26
- Country
- Location
1. i said as per my knowledge it can be right and it can be wrong and only time will proove me right or wrong i have no reservations against anybody(I here means me and im saying as an indian) to me what matters most is to make money from where i can make it leagally creating problems for others is the last thing that will come to my mind until that person harms my legitimate intersts
Thanks for being honest. You have a good heart. Unfortunately, when two countries have bad blood and rivalry between them, the good heart only prevails outside of Strategic Interests. However, personally, and as a third party watching India - Pakistan, I'd imagine sense will kick in and they will form more of an EU model and bring their countries together through trade and remove the risk of ever getting into a Nuclear exchange that would further destroy an-already poor part of the world.
. search youtube there was this guy from karachi who now lives in canada was explaining how the afghan soviet war was about ports and why and how saudia funded that jihad so the trade routes & Oil pipelines from central asia dont come to south asia wia afghanistan
The Afghan war was about the USSR getting to the Warm waters (aka the Oil routes, etc, that would mean Karachi, then Iran and then wherever they can get to). Saudi's, Egyptians, Israelis, Pakistanis and the Americans worked together to remove that threat once and for all. But, that has no impact of 45 years ago, today's Pakistan, India, Gawader and Chahabar. In fact, they are totally irrelevant. The issue today is economic dominance. The issue back with USSR was military dominance and capturing and blocking the Oil waterways. Two opposite times and issues altogether.
3. now had that happenned i mean trade and oil corridoars got oprational passing thru afghanistan and then to pakistan and from pakistan to india and china and indian goods going to central asia and iran wia afghansitan and pakistan how much money you could have genrated by just taking the transit fees since early 1960s when this idea was floated
Hey, I am ALL for what you are saying. Read my first paragraph. To me, it doesn't make sense to see the ongoing rivalry between India and Pakistan. I think they needed to implement an EU type of a model and expand trade and link to each other. But that won't be at the cost of anyone losing any strategic interest of theirs. Like the EU, India and Pakistan can work together to build trade yet be separate countries like Germany and Britain or the French are.
4.and when there are transit routes and trade corridoars many local people get many diffrent kinds of skills and jobs thus genrating huge money from taxes and other devlopment works now all that will go to iran and afghanistan
whose loss and whose profit you decide yourself.
You are saying what I am saying. The world's most money making big powers have learned that they can't be enemies forever and that people are better off doing trade and growing economies than wars. Same should be applicable to India and Pakistan. Problem is, India wants to be a regional power and have the mighty stick. Pakistan OTO, wants absolutely no Indian dominance on her (case since they were both created). So offers on the media and talks are great, but all offers (like NS and Mr. Singh made towards each other as gestures) then have to be followed by solid strategic talks. These won't ever become fruitful when politicians offer trade agreements while the intelligence agencies on both sides are busy killing each other's civilians. That's where the ball stop. A longer lasting peace deal if the first thing with no interference at the local level into each other's territory and no wars. Then the next step is to form a trade consortium or a conglomerate of mutually aligned business companies to jointly market (even produce) consumer products and services and slowly a peaceful India and Pakistan start to take form.