What's new

China's De-Dollarization Is Proceeding Apace

Russia and China Are Dead Serious About Ditching the Dollar

"The nations of Eurasia are developing modes of growing their economies independent of US Treasury financial sanctions"

F. William Engdahl

Rocky-IV-Stallone-Lundgren.jpg


The Russian government has recently announced it will issue nearly $1 billion equivalent in state bonds, but denominated not in US dollars as is mostly the case. Rather it will be the first sale of Russian bonds in China’s yuan.

While $1 billion may not sound like much when compared with the Peoples’ Bank of China total holdings of US Government debt of more than $1 trillion or to the US Federal debt today of over $20 trillion, it’s significance lies beyond the nominal amount. It’s a test run by both governments of the potential for state financing of infrastructure and other projects independent of dollar risk from such events as US Treasury financial sanctions.

Russian Debt and China Yuan

Since the August 1998 sovereign default triggered by the West, Russian state finances have been prudent to almost a fault. The size of the national government debt is the lowest of any major industrial country, a mere 10.6% of GDP for the current year. This has enabled Russia to withstand the US financial warfare sanctions imposed since 2014, and forced the country to turn elsewhere for their financial stability. That “elsewhere” is increasingly called the Peoples’ Republic of China.

Now the Russian Ministry of Finance is reportedly planning the first sale of Russian debt in the form of bonds denominated in Chinese yuan currency. The size of the first offering, a testing of the market, will be 6 billion yuan or just under $1 billion. The sale is being organized by the state-owned Russian Gazprombank, the Bank of China Ltd., and China’s largest state bank, Industrial & Commercial Bank of China. The move is being accelerated by reports that the US Treasury is examining potential consequences of extending penalties, until now concentrated on Russian oil and gas projects, to include Russian sovereign debt in its sanctions warfare. The new yuan bond will be traded on the Moscow Exchange and will aim to sell to mainland Chinese investors as well as international and Russian borrowers at attractive interest rates.

Western sanctions or threats of sanctions are forcing Russia and China to cooperate more strategically on what is becoming the seed of a genuine alternative to the dollar system. The Russian yuan debt offerings will also give a significant boost to China’s desire to build the yuan as an accepted international currency.

China Petro-Yuan

The steps to begin issuing Russian state debt in yuan are paralleled by another major development towards broader international yuan acceptance vis a vis the US dollar. On December 13, Chinese regulators completed final testing in preparation for launch of not a dollar-backed, but rather, a yuan-backed oil futures contract to be traded on the Shanghai Futures Exchange. The implications are potentially large.

China is the world’s largest oil importing country. Control of financial oil futures markets until now has been the tightly-guarded province of Wall Street banks and the New York, London and other futures exchanges they control. Emergence of Shanghai as a major yuan-based oil futures center could significantly weaken dollar domination of oil trade.

Since the 1970’s oil shock and the 400% rise in the oil price from OPEC countries, Washington has maintained a strict regime in which the world’s most valuable commodity, oil, would be traded in US dollars alone. In December 1974, the US Treasury signed a secret agreement in Riyadh with the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency, “to establish a new relationship through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York with the US Treasury borrowing operation” to buy US government debt with surplus petrodollars.

The Saudis agreed to enforce OPEC dollar-only oil sales in return for US sales of advanced military equipment (purchased for dollars of course) and a guarantee of protection from possible Israeli attack. This was the beginning of what then-US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger called recycling the petro-dollar. To the present, only two oil export country leaders, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Qaddafi, have tried to change the system and sell oil for euros or gold dinars. Now China is challenging the petro-dollar system in a different way with the petro-yuan.

The difference between Saddam Hussein or Qaddafi is that far more influential countries, Russia and now Iran, with China’s implicit support, are cooperating to avoid the dollar out of necessity forced by US pressure. That is a far stronger challenge to the US dollar than Iraq or Libya could ever manage.

The China yuan oil futures contract now will allow China’s trading partners to pay with gold or to convert yuan into gold without the necessity to keep money in Chinese assets or turn it into US dollars. Oil exporters such as Russia or Iran or Venezuela—all targets of US sanctions—can avoid those US sanctions by avoiding oil trades in dollars now. This past September Venezuela responded to US sanctions by ordering the state oil company and traders to make oil sale contracts into euro and not to pay or be paid in US dollars any longer.

Gold for oil?

The Shanghai International Energy Exchange will soon launch their crude-oil futures contract denominated in yuan. The Shanghai International Energy Exchange futures contract will streamline and solidify the process of selling oil to China for yuan that Russia began after sanctions in 2014. This will also allow other oil producers around the world to sell their oil for yuan instead of dollars. The crude oil futures contract will be the first commodity contract in China open to foreign investment funds, trading houses, and oil firms. The circumvention of US dollar trade could allow oil exporters such as Russia and Iran, for example, to bypass US sanctions.

To make the offer more attractive, China has linked the crude-oil futures contract with the option to efficiently convert yuan into physical gold through gold exchanges in Shanghai and Hong Kong. According to Wang Zhimin, director of the Center for Globalization and Modernization at China’s Institute of Foreign Economy and Trade, the possibility of converting the yuan oil futures into gold will give the Chinese futures a competitive advantage over Brent and West Texas Intermediate benchmarks.

Now Russia or Iran or other oil producers are in a position to sell oil to China for yuan or rubles, bypassing the dollar entirely. The shift is about to take place in the coming weeks as the yuan oil futures contract is officially launched. Further in October China and Russia launched what is called a payment versus payment (PVP) system for Chinese yuan and Russian ruble transactions that will reduce settlement risk for oil and other trades.

Already reportedly Russian oil and gas sales to China are being conducted in Ruble and Yuan and since the foolish US effort to isolate Qatar in the Persian Gulf, Qatar, a major LNG gas supplier to China has switched to pricing in yuan. Pressure is growing that at some point Saudi Arabia breaks its 1974 pact with Washington and sells its oil to China also for yuan.

Iran to Join EEU

A new element is about to be added to the growing cooperation across Eurasia centered around China and Russia, namely Iran. According to Behrouz Hassanolfat of Iran’s Trade Promotion Organization, in a statement carried on Iranian state-owned Press-TV, as early as February, 2018 Iran is set to become a member of Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). Presently the EEU, created in 2015, includes Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan to create a large zone for free transit of goods, services, capital and workers among member states. Presently the EEU is a market of 183 million people. Addition of Iran with its more than 80 million citizens would give a major boost to the economies of the EEU and to its economic importance, creating a common market of more than 263 million, with skilled labor, engineers, scientists and industrial know-how.

Iran has already announced, in face of escalating threats from Washington, that it seeks ways to sell its oil for non-dollar currencies. Integration into the EEU could bring a solution to this as Iran, Russia and China inevitably draw closer in face of relentless US pressures on all three.

Increasingly in proportion to the pressure from the West the nations of Eurasia are developing modes of growing their economies independent of US Treasury financial sanctions. In retrospect, it’s likely that those US sanctions will be seen as one of the more stupid attempts of Washington to dominate the economies of Eurasia.

Source: New Eastern Outlook
 
US has only one way to maintain its dominance and that is to damage China severely and weaken it to the point where everything collapse which is practically very very difficult. Otherwise world is entering in multi polar economic world and possibly unipolar and China centric world. Best of luck to our Chinese friends!
 
US has only one way to maintain its dominance and that is to damage China severely and weaken it to the point where everything collapse which is practically very very difficult. Otherwise world is entering in multi polar economic world and possibly unipolar and China centric world. Best of luck to our Chinese friends!
The stupid US mindset is preventing them from mounting a meaningful fight back against China. :enjoy:
 
The stupid US mindset is preventing them from mounting a meaningful fight back against China. :enjoy:

The US is working hard to push its traditional allies, let alone Russia, back to China's camp.

I just wish a second Trump term and welcome further trade wars against China, Japan and Korea by the US.
 
Yuan-priced Futures Can Be the End of the Petrodollar Age

24.02.2018 Author: Martin Berger




The diminished reliance on the US dollars is one of the major trends of international geopolitics. A lot of media attention has been paid to steps taken by the BRICS states, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa to decrease their dependence on American currency. Both the BRICS states and a number of other international players have repeatedly voiced their concern over the design of the modern global economic architecture that was imposed on the rest of the world by the United States. The whole structure of this global economy simply ignores the growing influence of new emerging markets. Because of Washington’s relentless desire to remain a global hegemon, imposing its will on other countries, the US dollar remains an instrument of economic suppression. The creation of the Euro, the rapid rise of the Chinese economy, and the intentions of a number of countries of the former USSR, the Middle East and Asia to switch to regional currency settlements have transformed the US dollar in a measuring instrument, thus undermining its status as a mandatory transaction currency.

Russia’s and China’s gold reserves against the dollar domination

The traditional transaction scheme, in which all financial operations are processed by London and a number of Swiss banks is losing its relevance these days as new centers of gold trade are emerging, primarily in India, China and South Africa. Suffice to say that Moscow and Beijing have already signed a memorandum on the development of mutual trade in gold. According Singapore -backed financial expert Ronan Manly, the gold reserves accumulated by China and Russia are a part of their strategy to move away from international trade denominated in US dollars. Manly is convinced that should those states show that they are holding more gold combined than the US, this would deal an enormous blow to the US dollar and to the position of the US within the global economy.

While all these initiatives can not immediately render the US dollar obsolete, one has to remember that China has been building its financial system for years and shows no signs of stopping.

The existing Western sanctions along with threats of new sanctions are forcing China and Russia t o cooperate more strategically in what is becoming the seed o f a genuine alternative to the dollar system. Since the 1998 sovereign default triggered by the West, Russia has been extremely cautious in all of its financial dealings, which allowed it to withstand the sanctions imposed on in by Washington in 2014, and forced the country to search elsewhere for the means of ensuring financial stability. That “elsewhere” is increasingly called the Peoples’ Republic of China.

Yuan-denominated bonds they are

Now the Treasury of Russia is planning to launch the sale of Russian debt in the form of bonds denominated in Chinese yuan. The size of the first offering, a sort of a test of the market, will barely reach 1 billion US dollars, which amounts to 6 billion yuan. The move is being accelerated by reports that the US Treasury is examining the potential consequences of extending its economic pressure on Russia. It’s curious that Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek has recently announced that Ankara is going to issue bonds in rubles and yuan in 2018, as it’s been reported by the Gercek Gundem recently.

These events are unravelling against the backdrop of the undeclared economic war between the US and China, which is moving into its active phase. The United States has already formally notified the World Trade Organization (WTO) that they refuse to recognize China as a market economy and are preparing another portion of anti-dumping duties. Washington has been constantly engaged in all sorts of investigations of China’s market policies, while relying on the rules that are most commonly applied to states with non-market economies. In turn, China’s authorities are seeking ways to achieve a “market” status, in a bid to get rid of the protective duties that are hampering its goods.

Gold for oil

But China has its own ways of turning the tables back on Washington, and while those ways are not quite as straightforward, their effects can potentially be much more devastating. China keeps pushing the US dollar off the global exchange market. Earlier, Beijing achieved the inclusion of the yuan in the SDR basket and is now about to challenge the dollar as a universal means of settling for oil futures. The twist is that the futures priced in yuans are going to be convertible into gold. It should be noted that gold-backed-oil-yuan-futures can prove to be extremely attractive for investors and oil-producing countries, particularly those that possess conflicting interests with the sole remaining “superpower”. Those are, among others, Russia, Venezuela, and Iran.

The sale of yuan priced futures is aimed at decreasing the dependency of the global financial markets on the US dollar, but this process can take a while. Since the 1970s, OPEC states have been selling oil in petrodollars, which has made the transformation of petrodollars into US treasury bonds an integral component of the US economy. But from now on, oil producers will be able to sidestep dollar priced futures by choosing those futures that they can freely convert into gold. In addition, China is going to give a greater share of the market to those countries that will agree to trade oil futures in yuan, thus the biggest trading partners of Beijing are going to be forced to invest in those futures in a bid to preserve their market share. The possibility of trading oil futures for yuan, no doubt, will be very in high demand across the Eurasian economic space, as well as in several countries of Africa and Latin America. Yet, this will be enough to increase China’s influence along the path chosen for the implementation of the One Belt, One Road massive infrastructure project.

Given the great strategic importance of oil and energy resources in general, the political aspect of yuan priced futures outweighs even the economic component of this shift. Even if initially they will occupy a small margin of the market, this will mean that China is capable of undermining the global reliance on the US dollar, which lays at the very foundation of Washington’s geopolitical power. As a result, we should expect a gradual, but nonetheless imminent reduction in the global dependence on petrodollars


New Eastern Outlook.
https://journal-neo.org/2018/02/24/yuan-priced-futures-can-be-the-end-of-the-petrodollar-age/
 
The US-based world order is coming to an end, unfortunately!!!! Pak is poised to take early harvests for it's being an early joiner!!! Turkey is also all set to revisit 1850s "great game" - this time aligning with Russia....
 
You guys should watch these. The first vid, the commentator is quite impressive.

Germany-Eurasian-Islamic World-Russia-China alliance | deep state | 37:25 China - 15000 tonnes of gold


 
Last edited:
Thread was started in Oct 24, 2016 and now we are in 2018 but nothing much has happened.
Fan boys keep peddling the same stuff without any hard facts.
 
China's De-Dollarization Is Proceeding Apace


As of October 1st, the Chinese yuan has entered the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) basket of top-tier currencies. It now shares SDR status with the U.S. dollar, euro, British pound, and Japanese yen.

Before the yuan officially becomes an SDR currency, the World Bank intends to sell $2.8 billion in SDR bonds in Chinese markets. The rollout of SDR bonds in China began August 31st. According to Reuters, China’s promotion of SDR bonds “is part of a wider push in China to… boost demand for Chinese yuan and diminish reliance on the U.S. dollar in global reserves.”

So here is my problem with this theory of China wanting to "De-Dollar". The underlined above, IMF and the World Bank, together with the WTO and International Bank of Settlement, are institutions ESTABLISHED BY THE US after the WW2. These are US dominated and "controlled" institutions. So why would China let these institutions "call the shots" in China. Example, the World Bank selling SDR bonds in China, why would China allow a US establish and controlled institution to do this??

The only logical conclusion is that US is still calling the shots, and in fact, China and US are two faces of the same coin. Now some members may not like what I am saying, but what else can one conclude from this?
 
So here is my problem with this theory of China wanting to "De-Dollar". The underlined above, IMF and the World Bank, together with the WTO and International Bank of Settlement, are institutions ESTABLISHED BY THE US after the WW2. These are US dominated and "controlled" institutions. So why would China let these institutions "call the shots" in China. Example, the World Bank selling SDR bonds in China, why would China allow a US establish and controlled institution to do this??

The only logical conclusion is that US is still calling the shots, and in fact, China and US are two faces of the same coin. Now some members may not like what I am saying, but what else can one conclude from this?

I think you cannot leave the entire structure all of a sudden. It should be a managed process. Without creating alternatives that are attractive to at least some member of international community, leaving the existing system is shooting oneself in the foot.

Besides, China does not seem to aim to destroy the system created after the WWII; it just works to turn it into something that is more amenable to its national interests and to the interests of other developing nations.

This is the reason, China simply offer new alternatives without at times even leaving the existing institutions. It is thanks to this cooperative spirit, for example, that the AIIB can work with WB, ADB, and EBRD at the same time.

China thinks zero-sum is unmanageable.
 
I think you cannot leave the entire structure all of a sudden. It should be a managed process. Without creating alternatives that are attractive to at least some member of international community, leaving the existing system is shooting oneself in the foot.

Besides, China does not seem to aim to destroy the system created after the WWII; it just works to turn it into something that is more amenable to its national interests and to the interests of other developing nations.

This is the reason, China simply offer new alternatives without at times even leaving the existing institutions. It is thanks to this cooperative spirit, for example, that the AIIB can work with WB, ADB, and EBRD at the same time.

China thinks zero-sum is unmanageable.

Good points. Maybe China's analysis is that there are just too many risks in leaving and establishing "new alternative" institutions. It is trying to work from within. However, my thought process is that when US has established these institutions to impose a US dominated financial system, it would be extremely hard to beat the US at its own game or even propose alternatives to the systems which it is the Master of.
 
So here is my problem with this theory of China wanting to "De-Dollar". The underlined above, IMF and the World Bank, together with the WTO and International Bank of Settlement, are institutions ESTABLISHED BY THE US after the WW2. These are US dominated and "controlled" institutions. So why would China let these institutions "call the shots" in China. Example, the World Bank selling SDR bonds in China, why would China allow a US establish and controlled institution to do this??

The only logical conclusion is that US is still calling the shots, and in fact, China and US are two faces of the same coin. Now some members may not like what I am saying, but what else can one conclude from this?

Good trick!Aussies, like UK, Japan, might be the other face of the American coin. We are a different coin.
 
Good points. Maybe China's analysis is that there are just too many risks in leaving and establishing "new alternative" institutions. It is trying to work from within. However, my thought process is that when US has established these institutions to impose a US dominated financial system, it would be extremely hard to beat the US at its own game or even propose alternatives to the systems which it is the Master of.

In fact, international system is not entirely US-controlled. It has more say in IMF and WB perhaps, but the real strength of the US comes from the Western alliance which acts often in unison when the US acts (even though there may be individual countries unhappy like France during the Second Gulf War).

Otherwise, there is little reason for China, for example to criticize UNSC model which China itself (then represented by the ROC) partook in creating.

So, China indeed offer alternatives such as the AIIB, but, those alternatives are not destructive of the existing system, but, aim to improve it.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom